Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Virtual Impedance Control for Safe Human-Robot Interaction

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collision avoidance is essential for safe robot manipulation. Especially with humans around, robots should work only when safety can be robustly guaranteed. In this paper, we propose using virtual impedance control for reactive, smooth, and consistent collision avoidance that interferes minimally with the original task. The virtual impedance control operates in the risk space, a vector space describing the possibilities of all forthcoming collisions, and is designed to elude all risks in a consistent response in order to create assuring human-robot interaction experiences. The proposed scheme intrinsically handles kinematic singularity and the activation of avoidance using a boundary layer defined on the spectrum of Jacobian. In cooperation with the original controller, the proposed avoidance scheme provides a proof of convergence if the original controller is stable with and without projection. In simulations and experiments, we verified the characteristics of the proposed control scheme and integrated the system with Microsoft Kinect to monitor the workspace for real-time collision detection and avoidance. The results show that the proposed approach is suitable for robot operation with humans nearby.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pedrocchi, N., Vicentini, F., Matteo, M., Tosatti, L.M.: Safe human-robot cooperation in an industrial environment. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 10(26) (2013)

  2. Shi, J., Jimmerson, G., Pearson, T., Menassa, R.: Levels of human and robot collaboration for automotive manufacturing. In: Workshop Perform. Metr. Intell. Syst., Maryland, pp. 95–100 (2012)

  3. Matthias, B., Kock, S., Jerregard, H., Kallman, M., Lundberg, I., Mellander, R.: Safety of collaborative industrial robots: certification possibilities for a collaborative assembly robot concept (2011)

  4. Heyer, C.: Human-robot interaction and future industrial robotics applications. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., Taipei, pp. 4749–4754 (2010)

  5. Haddadin, S., Parusel, S., Belder, R., Albu-Schaffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Safe acting and manipulation in human environments: a key concept for robots in our society. In: IEEE Workshop Adv. Robot. Its Soc. Impacts, Half-Moon Bay, pp. 72–75 (2011)

  6. Lasota, P.A., Rossano, G.F., Shah, J.A.: Toward safe close-proximity human-robot interaction with standard industrial robots. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Autom. Sci. Eng., Taipei, pp. 339–344 (2014)

  7. Mitka, E., Gasteratos, A., Kyriakoulis, N., Mouroutsos, S.G.: Safety certification requirements for domestic robots. Saf. Sci. 50(8), 1888–1897 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vasic, M., Billard, A.: Safety issues in human-robot interactions. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 197-204 (2013)

  9. Sentis, L., Park, J., Khatib, O.: Compliant control of multicontact and center-of-mass behaviors in humanoid robots. IEEE Tran. Robot. 26(3), 483–501 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taïx, M., Flavigné, D., Ferré, E.: Human interaction with motion planning algorithm. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 67(3–4), 285–306 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arkin, R.C.: Integrating behavioral, perceptual, and world knowledge in reactive navigation. J. Robot. Auton. Syst. 6(1), 105–122 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietrich, A., Wimbock, T., Albu-Schaffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Integration of reactive, torque-based self-collision avoidance into a task hierarchy. IEEE Tran. Robot. 28(5), 1278–1293 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Petric, T., Lajpah, L.: Smooth continuous transition between tasks on a kinematic control level: obstacle avoidance as a control problem. J. Robot. Auton. Syst. 61(8), 948–959 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietrich, A., Wimbock, T., Taubig, H., Albu-Schaffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Extensions to reactive self-collision avoidance for torque and position controlled humanoids. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Shanghai, pp. 3455–3462 (2011)

  15. Flacco, F., Kroeger, T., De Luca, A., Khatib, O.: A Depth Space Approach for Evaluating Distance to Objects. J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 1–16 (2014)

  16. Stasse, O., Escande, A., Mansard, N., Miossec, S., Evrard, P., Kheddar, A.: Real-time (self)-collision avoidance task on a hrp-2 humanoid robot. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. Pasadena, pp. 3200–3205 (2008)

  17. Khatib, O.: Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Int. J. Robot. Res. 5(1), 90–98 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Brock, O., Khatib, O., Viji, S.: Task-consistent obstacle avoidance and motion behavior for mobile manipulation. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Washington, pp. 388–393 (2002)

  19. Dietrich, A., Wimbock, T., Albu-Schaffer, A.: Dynamic whole-body mobile manipulation with a torque controlled humanoid robot via impedance control laws. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., San Francisco, pp. 3199–3206 (2011)

  20. Flacco, F., Kroger, T., De Luca, A., Khatib, O.: A depth space approach to human-robot collision avoidance. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Saint Paul, pp. 338–345 (2012)

  21. García-Delgado, L., Noriega, J., Berman-Mendoza, D., Leal-Cruz, A., Vera-Marquina, A., Gómez-Fuentes, R., García-Juárez, A., Rojas-Hernández, A., Zaldívar-Huerta, I.: Repulsive Function in Potential Field Based Control with Algorithm for Safer Avoidance. J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 1–12 (2014)

  22. Haddadin, S., Belder, R., Albu-Schäffer, A.: Dynamic motion planning for robots in partially unknown environments. In: IFAC World Congres., Milano, Italy, p 2011

  23. Scott, N.A., Carignan, C.R.: A line-based obstacle avoidance technique for dexterous manipulator operations. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Pasadena, pp. 3353–3358 (2008)

  24. Sentis, L., Khatib, O.: A whole-body control framework for humanoids operating in human environments. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Orlando, pp. 2641–2648 (2006)

  25. Dietrich, A., Wimbock, T., Albu-Schaffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Reactive whole-body control: Dynamic mobile manipulation using a large number of actuated degrees of freedom. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(2), 20–33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haddadin, S., Parusel, S., Belder, R., Vogel, J., Rokahr, T., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Holistic design and analysis for the human-friendly robotic co-worker. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., Taipei, pp. 4735–4742 (2010)

  27. Haddadin, S., Urbanek, H., Parusel, S., Burschka, D., Rossmann, J., Albu-Schaffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Real-time reactive motion generation based on variable attractor dynamics and shaped velocities. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. Taipei, pp. 3109–3116 (2010)

  28. De Santis, A., Albu-Schäffer, A., Ott, C., Siciliano, B., Hirzinger, G.: The skeleton algorithm for self-collision avoidance of a humanoid manipulator. In: IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mech., Zurich, pp. 1–6 (2007)

  29. Sugiura, H., Gienger, M., Janssen, H., Goerick, C.: Real-time self collision avoidance for humanoids by means of nullspace criteria and task intervals. In: IEEE/RAS Int. Conf. Humanoid Robot., Genova, pp. 575–580 (2006)

  30. Khatib, O.: A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: the operational space formulation. IEEE Tran. Robot. Autom. 3(1), 43–53 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chiaverini, S.: Singularity-robust task-priority redundancy resolution for real-time kinematic control of robot manipulators. IEEE Tran. Robot. Autom. 13(3), 398–410 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Caccavale, F., Chiaverini, S., Siciliano, B.: Second-order kinematic control of robot manipulators with Jacobian damped least-squares inverse: theory and experiments. IEEE/ASME Tran. Mech. 2(3), 188–194 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Sheng-Yen Lo, Ching-An Cheng & Han-Pang Huang

Authors
  1. Sheng-Yen Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ching-An Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Han-Pang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han-Pang Huang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(AVI 2.55 MB)

(AVI 5.25 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, SY., Cheng, CA. & Huang, HP. Virtual Impedance Control for Safe Human-Robot Interaction. J Intell Robot Syst 82, 3–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-015-0250-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-015-0250-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation