Skip to main content
Log in

Dual therapy with oral anticoagulation and single antiplatelet agent versus monotherapy with oral anticoagulation alone in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable ischemic heart disease, recent guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy in preference to OAC + single antiplatelet agent (SAPT) dual therapy. However, these data are based on the results of only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a relatively small group of patients. Thus, the safety and efficacy of this approach may be underpowered to detect a significant difference.

We hypothesized that OAC monotherapy will have a reduced risk of bleeding, but similar all-cause mortality and ischemic outcomes as compared to dual therapy (OAC + SAPT).

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus was conducted. Safety outcomes included total bleeding, major bleeding, and others. Efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RCTs and observational studies were pooled separately (study design stratified meta-analysis). Subgroup analyses were performed for vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Pooled risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel method.

Results

Meta-analysis of 2 RCTs comprising a total of 2905 patients showed that dual therapy (OAC + SAPT) vs. OAC monotherapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in major bleeding (RR 1.51; 95% CI [1.10, 2.06]). There was no significant reduction in MACE (RR 1.10; [0.71, 1.72]), stroke (RR 1.29; [0.85, 1.95]), myocardial infarction (RR 0.57; [0.28, 1.16]), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.22; [0.63, 2.35]), or all-cause mortality (RR 1.18 [0.52, 2.68]). Meta-analysis of 20 observational studies comprising 47,451 patients showed that dual therapy (OAC + SAPT) vs. OAC monotherapy was associated with a statistically significant higher total bleeding (RR 1.50; [1.20, 1.88]), major bleeding (RR = 1.49; [1.38, 1.61]), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 1.62; [1.15, 2.28]), and myocardial infarction (RR = 1.15; [1.05, 1.26]), without significantly lower MACE (RR 1.10; [0.97, 1.24]), stroke (RR 0.93; [0.73, 1.19]), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.11; [0.95, 1.29]), or all-cause mortality (RR 0.93; [0.78, 1.11]). Subgroup analysis showed similar results for both vitamin K antagonists and DOACs, except a statistically significant higher intracranial bleeding with vitamin K antagonist + SAPT vs. vitamin K antagonist monotherapy (RR 1.89; [1.36–2.63]).

Conclusions

In patients with AF and stable ischemic heart disease, OAC + SAPT as compared to OAC monotherapy is associated with a significant increase in bleeding events without a significant reduction in thrombotic events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

DOAC:

Direct oral anticoagulation

OAC:

Oral anticoagulation

VKA:

Vitamin K antagonist

SAPT:

Single antiplatelet therapy

References

  1. Lip GYH, Laroche C, Dan G-A, et al. A prospective survey in European Society of Cardiology member countries of atrial fibrillation management: baseline results of EURObservational Research Programme Atrial Fibrillation (EORP-AF) Pilot General Registry. Europace. 2014;16:308–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kralev S, Schneider K, Lang S, Süselbeck T, Borggrefe M. Incidence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time coronary angiography. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24964.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheung CC, Nattel S, Macle L, Andrade JG. Atrial fibrillation management in 2021: an updated comparison of the current CCS/CHRS, ESC, and AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(10):1607–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.06.011.

  4. Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Circ Am Heart Assoc. 2014;130:1749–67.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Circ Am Heart Assoc. 2014;130:e344–426.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yasuda S, Kaikita K, Akao M, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1103–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsumura-Nakano Y, Shizuta S, Komasa A, et al. Open-label randomized trial comparing oral anticoagulation with and without single antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease beyond 1 year after coronary stent implantation. Circ Am Heart Assoc. 2019;139:604–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley; 2008 [cited 2021 Jan 26]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184.

  10. Moher D. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation. Available from: www.covidence.org.

  12. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928–d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2009. Available from: http://www.ohrica/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxfordasp.

  14. DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:105–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Cochrane Collaboration. 2020.

  16. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation with stable coronary disease. NEJM. [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1904143.

  17. Matsumura-Nakano Y, Shizuta S, Komasa A, et al. Open-label randomized trial comparing oral anticoagulation with and without single antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease beyond 1 year after coronary stent implantation. Circ Am Heart Assoc. 2019;139:604–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knight S, McCubrey RO, Yuan Z, et al. Adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome with indications for anticoagulation. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;10:231–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukamachi D, Okumura Y, Yokoyama K, et al. Adverse clinical events in Japanese atrial fibrillation patients with and without coronary artery disease-findings from the SAKURA AF Registry. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35:2053–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamberts M, Gislason GH, Lip GYH, et al. Antiplatelet therapy for stable coronary artery disease in atrial fibrillation patients taking an oral anticoagulant. Circ Am Heart Assoc. 2014;129:1577–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei L, Su E, Liu W, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in coronary artery disease patients with atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20:323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamberts M, Lip GYH, Ruwald MH, et al. Antithrombotic treatment in patients with heart failure and associated atrial fibrillation and vascular disease: a nationwide cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2689–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bahit MC, Lopes RD, Wojdyla DM, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior coronary artery disease: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial. Int J Cardiol Elsevier. 2013;170:215–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu H, Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, et al. Concomitant use of single antiplatelet therapy with edoxaban or warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis from the ENGAGE AF‐TIMI48 trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(2):e002587. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002587.

  25. Ezekowitz MD, Reilly PA, Nehmiz G, et al. Dabigatran with or without concomitant aspirin compared with warfarin alone in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (PETRO Study). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1419–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamon M, Lemesle G, Tricot O, et al. Incidence, source, determinants, and prognostic impact of major bleeding in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1430–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mahaffey KW, Stevens SR, White HD, et al. Ischaemic cardiac outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with vitamin K antagonism or factor Xa inhibition: results from the ROCKET AF trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:233–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer Q, Georges JL, Le Feuvre C, et al. Optimal long-term antithrombotic treatment of patients with stable coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation: “OLTAT registry”. Int J Cardiol. 2018;264:64–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Verheugt FWA, Ambrosio G, Atar D, et al. Outcomes in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation and history of acute coronary syndromes: insights from GARFIELD-AF. Am J Med. 2019;132:1431-1440.e7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Patti G, Pecen L, Lucerna M, et al. Outcomes of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation treated with or without antiplatelet therapy - a pooled analysis from the PREFER in AF and PREFER in AF PROLONGATON registries. Int J Cardiol. 2018;270:160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi Y, Lee Y, Kim S-H, et al. Single direct oral anticoagulant therapy in stable patients with atrial fibrillation beyond 1 year after coronary stent implantation. Heart . 2022;108(4):285–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318750.

  32. Inohara T, Shrader P, Pieper K, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with concomitant coronary or peripheral artery disease: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation II. Am Heart J. 2019;213:81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Steinberg BA, Kim S, Piccini JP, et al. Use and associated risks of concomitant aspirin therapy with oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Registry. Circulation. 2013;128:721–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Shah R, Hellkamp A, Lokhnygina Y, et al. Use of concomitant aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the ROCKET AF trial. Am Heart J. 2016;179:77–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gawałko M, Lodziński P, Budnik M, et al. Vascular disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. A report from Polish participants in the EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e13701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lemesle G, Ducrocq G, Elbez Y, et al. Vitamin K antagonists with or without long-term antiplatelet therapy in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation: association with ischemic and bleeding events. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:932–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Shiroto T, Sakata Y, Nochioka K, et al. Clinical benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with comorbidities - a report from the CHART-2 Study. Int J Cardiol. 2020;299:160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. Massachusetts Medical Society. 2011;365:883–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bahit MC, Lopes RD, Wojdyla DM, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior coronary artery disease: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial. Int J Cardiol. Elsevier. 2013;170:215–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. NEJM. [cited 2022 Mar 21]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0905561.

  41. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. Massachusetts Medical Society. 2013;369:2093–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kwon O, Park D-W. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary interventions in East Asian populations. JACC: Asia. American College of Cardiology Foundation. 2022;2:1–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Matteau A, Yeh R, Camenzind E, et al. Balancing long-term risks of ischemic and bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:686–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Madhavan MV, Kirtane AJ, Redfors B, et al. Stent-related adverse events >1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. American College of Cardiology Foundation. 2020;75:590–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ullah W, Sattar Y, Shaukat M, Fischman DL. Safety and efficacy of anticoagulant monotherapy in atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2020;81:54–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee S-R, Rhee T-M, Kang D-Y, Choi E-K, Oh S, Lip GYH. Meta-analysis of oral anticoagulant monotherapy as an antithrombotic strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:879–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wernly B, Bhatt DL, Polzin A, Jung C. Antithrombotic therapy for chronic coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation: less might be more. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;49:321–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kheiri B, Simpson TF, Stecker EC, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation with stable coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;50:395–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by an Education Research Grant from Academy of Teaching Scholars University of Oklahoma College of Medicine awarded to Zain Ul Abideen Asad, MD MS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zain Ul Abideen Asad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Relationship with industry

None of the authors has industry relationships related to this manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14236 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shakir, A., Khan, A., Agarwal, S. et al. Dual therapy with oral anticoagulation and single antiplatelet agent versus monotherapy with oral anticoagulation alone in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 493–506 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01347-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01347-1

Keywords

Navigation