Skip to main content
Log in

Pulmonary vein size is associated with reconnection following cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The second-generation cryoballoon (CB) has proven to be a highly effective ablative strategy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). This study sought to investigate the anatomical characteristics of pulmonary veins (PVs) and the relationship between their size, ovality, and late reconnections in a large cohort of patients undergoing repeat ablation for recurrence of atrial arrhythmias.

Methods and results

A total of 152 consecutive patients (98 males, 64.5%; mean age 64.9 ± 9.6 years) underwent a repeat ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after a median time of 6.5 months [IQR 11] from the index CB ablation. All repeat ablations were performed using a 3-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping system. Among all 593 PVs, 134 (22.6%) showed a late PV reconnection in 95 patients (0.88 per patient), at the time of repeat ablation procedure. There was a significant difference in ovality between left- and right-sided PVs (p < 0.001). Greater diameters of left superior PV, left inferior PV, and right inferior PV ostia (both maximum and minimum) and higher index ovality were significantly associated with late PV reconnection.

Conclusions

The rate of late PV reconnection after CB ablation was low (0.88 PVs/patient). Left-sided PVs were more oval than septal PVs. Larger PV dimensions and higher ovality index were significantly associated with reconnections in all PVs except for RSPV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee G, Sanders P, Kalman JM. Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art. Lancet. 2012;380:1509–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP, Tondo C, FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Schmidt B, Gunawardene M, Schulte-Hahn B, Urban V, Bode F, Nowak B, Chun JK. Improved procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel second-generation cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:492–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Giovanni G, Wauters K, Chierchia GB, Sieira J, Levinstein M, Conte G, de Asmundis C, Baltogiannis G, Saitoh Y, Ciconte G, Julia J, Mugnai G, Irfan G, Brugada P. One-year follow-up after single procedure cryoballoon ablation: a comparison between the first and second generation balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:834–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Metzner A, Reissmann B, Rausch P, Mathew S, Wohlmuth P, Tilz R, Rillig A, Lemes C, Deiss S, Heeger C, Kamioka M, Lin T, Ouyang F, Kuck KH, Wissner E. One-year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:288–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lustgarten DL, Keane D, Ruskin J. Cryothermal ablation: mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1999;41:481–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sorgente A, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, Sarkozy A, Namdar M, Capulzini L, Yazaki Y, Muller-Burri SA, Bayrak F, Brugada P. Pulmonary vein ostium shape and orientation as possible predictors of occlusion in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing cryoballoon ablation. Europace. 2011;13:205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Knecht S, Kühne M, Altmann D, Ammann P, Schaer B, Osswald S, Sticherling C. Anatomical predictors for acute and mid-term success of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation using the 28 mm balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:132–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt M, Dorwarth U, Straube F, Daccarett M, Rieber J, Wankerl M, Krieg J, Leber AW, Ebersberger U, Huber A, Rummeny E, Hoffmann E. Cryoballoon in AF ablation: impact of PV ovality on AF recurrence. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen X, Fang P, Liu Z, He J, Tang M, Liu J, Lu B, Zhang S. Pulmonary vein anatomy is associated with cryo kinetics during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;110:440–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kajiyama T, Miyazaki S, Matsuda J, Watanabe T, Niida T, Takagi T, Nakamura H, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, Iesaka Y. Anatomic parameters predicting procedural difficulty and balloon temperature predicting successful applications in individual pulmonary veins during 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:580–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciconte G, Mugnai G, Sieira J, Velagić V, Saitoh Y, Irfan G, Hunuk B, Ströker E, Conte G, Di Giovanni G, Baltogiannis G, Wauters K, Brugada P, de Asmundis C, Chierchia GB. On the quest for the best freeze: predictors of late pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ströker E, de Asmundis C, Saitoh Y, Velagic V, Mugnai G, Irfan G, Hunuk B, Tanaka K, Belsack D, Buyl R, Brugada P, Chierchia GB. Anatomic predictors of phrenic nerve injury in the setting of pulmonary vein isolation using the 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:342–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borio G, Maj R, Rizzo A, Stroker E, Sieira J, Osorio TG, Galli A, Terasawa M, Bala G, Al Housari M, Paparella G, Iacopino S, Overeinder I, Brugada P, de Asmundis C, Chierchia GB. Pulmonary veins anatomical determinants of cooling kinetics during second-generation cryoballoon ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31:629–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bordignon S, Fürnkranz A, Perrotta L, Dugo D, Konstantinou A, Nowak B, Schulte-Hahn B, Schmidt B, Chun KR. High rate of durable pulmonary vein isolation after second-generation cryoballoon ablation: analysis of repeat procedures. Europace. 2015;17:725–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heeger CH, Wissner E, Mathew S, Deiss S, Lemes C, Rillig A, Wohlmuth P, Reissmann B, Tilz RR, Ouyang F, Kuck KH, Metzner A. Once isolated, always isolated? Incidence and characteristics of pulmonary vein reconduction after second-generation cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1088–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aryana A, Mugnai G, Singh SM, Pujara DK, de Asmundis C, Singh SK, Bowers MR, Brugada P, d’Avila A, O’Neill PG, Chierchia GB. Procedural and biophysical indicators of durable pulmonary vein isolation during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:424–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ciconte G, Velagić V, Mugnai G, Saitoh Y, Irfan G, Hunuk B, Ströker E, Conte G, Sieira J, Di Giovanni G, Baltogiannis G, Brugada P, de Asmundis C, Chierchia GB. Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures. Europace. 2016;18:71–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kettering K, Gramley F. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for redo procedures after pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon technique. Long-term outcome Herzschr Elektrophys. 2017;28:225–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Daimee UA, Akhtar T, Boyle TA, Jager L, Arbab-Zadeh A, Marine JE, Berger RD, Calkins H, Spragg DD. Repeat catheter ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation: electrophysiologic findings and clinical outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32:628–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nolasco RR, Leon-Larios G, Bazzini-Carranza DE, Zavaleta E, Calixto-Vargas O. Reconnection sites in redo ablation after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021;117:100–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guler E, Guler GB, Demir GG, Kizilirmak F, Gunes HM, Barutcu I, Kilicaslan F. Effect of pulmonary vein anatomy and pulmonary vein diameters on outcome of cryoballoon catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:989–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Mugnai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The retrospective registry has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of our institution.

Consent to participate

None.

Conflict of interest

G.B.C. reports speaker fees for Medtronic, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, and Abbott; teaching honoraria from Medtronic and Biotronik; and proctoring honoraria from Medtronic; C.d.A. reports speaker fees for Medtronic, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; teaching honoraria from Medtronic, Biotronik, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; and proctoring honoraria from Medtronic, Abbott, and Biotronik.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mugnai, G., Cecchini, F., Stroker, E. et al. Pulmonary vein size is associated with reconnection following cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 65, 717–724 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01330-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01330-w

Keywords

Navigation