Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usage of a new mapping algorithm to detect possible critical substrate for continuity of atrial fibrillation: fractionation mapping in preliminary experience

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) classically focuses on eliminating the pulmonary vein (PV) triggers, isolation of PVs is associated with limited success rates in patients with persistent AF. The role of the left atrial appendage (LAA) as both trigger and driver in arrhythmogenesis of AF was previously demonstrated. In the present case, fractionation mapping software of Ensite system was firstly tested to detect critical substrate during AF. Focusing on the width and continuity of fractionation pattern, the LAA was accepted as main driver for maintenance of AF. Ablation in fractionated electrograms around the LAA caused acute AF termination. After isolation of the LAA, no AF was inducible with atrial stimulation with and without isoproterenol infusion. Fractionation mapping may be used to detect potential importance of the LAA in AF continuity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Santangeli P, Zado ES, Hutchinson MD, Riley MP, Lin D, Frankel DS, et al. Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:374–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DiBiase L, Burkhardt JD, Mohanty P, Sanchez J, Mohanty S, Horton R, et al. Left atrial appendage:an underrecognized trigger site of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010;122:109–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen BJ, Csepe TA, Zhao J, Ignozzi AJ, Hummel JD, Fedorov VV. Maintenance of atrial fibrillation: are reentrant drivers with spatial stability the key? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004398.

  4. Atienza F, Almendral J, Ormaetxe JM, Moya A, Martínez-Alday JD, Hernández-Madrid A, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2455–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Denis A, Shah AJ, Komatsu Y, Yamashita S, et al. Driver domains in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014;130:530–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohanty S, Gianni C, Mohanty P, Halbfass P, Metz T, Trivedi C, et al. RETRACTED: impact of rotor ablation in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation patients: results from the randomized OASIS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:274–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arruda M, Natale A. Ablation of permanent AF: adjunctive strategies to pulmonary veins isolation: targeting 26 AF NEST in sinus rhythm and CFAE in AF. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;23:51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1812–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong KC, Paisey JR, Sopher M, Balasubramaniam R, Jones M, Qureshi N, et al. No benefit of complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and linear ablation: BOCA study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1316–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Shivkumar K, Clopton P, Rappel WJ, Miller JM. Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (conventional ablation for atrial fibrillation with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:628–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Sanchez JE, Trivedi C, et al. Left atrial appendage isolation in patients with longstanding persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation BELIEF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1929–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lakkireddy D, Sridhar Mahankali A, Kanmanthareddy A, Lee R, Badhwar N, Bartus K, et al. Left atrial appendage ligation and ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. The LAALA-AF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 2015;1:153–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lim HS, Hocini M, Dubois R, Denis A, Derval N, Zellerhoff S, et al. Complexity and distribution of drivers in relation to duration of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1257–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, Schwab M, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Vasavakul T, et al. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2044–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pachon MJC, Pachon MEI, Pachon MJC, Lobo TJ, Pachon MZ, Vargas RN, et al. A new treatment for atrial fibrillation based on spectral analysis to guide the catheter RF-ablation. Europace. 2004;6:590–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masuda M, Fujita M, Iida O, Okamoto S, Ishihara T, Nanto K, et al. Comparison of left atrial voltage between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation in association with electrogram waveform. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:559–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Naksuk N, Padmanabhan D, Yogeswaran V, Asirvatham SJ. Left atrial appendage: embryology, anatomy, physiology, arrhythmia and therapeutic intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 2016;2:403–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Viles-Gonzalez JF, Gomes JA, Miller MA, Dukkipati SR, Koruth JS, Eggert C, et al. Areas with complex fractionated atrial electrograms recorded after pulmonary vein isolation represent normal voltage and conduction velocity in sinus rhythm. Europace. 2013;15:339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Launer H, Clark T, Dewland T, Henrikson CA, Nazer B. An automated fractionation mapping algorithm for mapping of scar-based ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42:1133–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen BJ, Zhao J, Csepe TA, Moore BT, Li N, Jayne LA, et al. Atrial fibrillation driven by micro-anatomic intramural re-entry revealed by simultaneous sub-epicardial and sub-endocardial optical mapping in explanted human hearts. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2390–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allessie MA, Bonke FI, Schopman FJ. Circus movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia. III. The “leading circle” concept: a new model of circus movement in cardiac tissue without the involvement of an anatomical obstacle. Circ Res. 1977;41:9–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee G, Kumar S, Teh A, Madry A, Spence S, Larobina M, et al. Epicardial wave mapping in human long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: transient rotational circuits, complex wavefronts, and disorganized activity. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cuculich PS, Wang Y, Lindsay BD, Faddis MN, Schuessler RB, Damiano RJ Jr, et al. Noninvasive characterization of epicardial activation in humans with diverse atrial fibrillation patterns. Circulation. 2010;122:1364–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aksu T, Guler TE. Electroanatomical mapping guided ablation during atrial fibrillation: a novel usage of fractionation mapping in a case with sinus bradycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00633-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;50:1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Al-Ahmad A, Horton R, Burkhardt JD, Sanchez JE, et al. Ablation for atrial fibrillation: termination of atrial fibrillation is not the end point. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2012;4:343–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lim HS, Derval N, Komatsu Y, Zellerhoff S, Denis A, Shah AJ, et al. Is ablation to termination the best strategy for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation? Persistent atrial fibrillation is best ablated by a strategy that terminates the arrhythmia: procedural termination is associated with improved long-term outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:963–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kochhäuser S, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R. Impact of acute atrial fibrillation termination and prolongation of atrial fibrillation cycle length on the outcome of ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a substudy of the STAR AF II trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:476–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin YT, Chang ET, Eatock J, Galla T, Clayton RH. Mechanisms of stochastic onset and termination of atrial fibrillation studied with a cellular automaton model. J R Soc Interface. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolga Aksu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental Fig. 1

Data collection for left atrial fractionation map by using settings in Fig. 1 is shown in LAO projection. Purple areas demonstrate electrograms lower than 4 deflections (JPG 502 kb)

Supplemental Fig. 2

Fractionation map of left atrium and intracardiac electrograms during radiofrequency ablation around the LAA. Ablation is started from fragmented sites around the ostium of left atrial appendage. Translation from atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter after the first radiofrequency lesion is seen in below (JPG 269 kb)

Supplemental Fig. 3

Fractionation map of left atrium and intracardiac electrograms during radiofrequency ablation around the LAA. Sinus rhythm is achieved ablation in progress in the near site. Please compare the tip of ablation catheter with Supplemental Fig. 2 (JPG 256 kb)

Movie 1

Ablation is started from fragmented sites around the ostium of left atrial appendage. Please see translation from atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter after the first radiofrequency lesion (MPG 8492 kb)

Movie 2

The ninth radiofrequency lesion around the ostium of left atrial appendage causes acute AF termination (MPG 10315 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aksu, T., Guler, T.E., Bozyel, S. et al. Usage of a new mapping algorithm to detect possible critical substrate for continuity of atrial fibrillation: fractionation mapping in preliminary experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 58, 29–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00693-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00693-x

Keywords

Navigation