Abstract
Since their inception, computational models have become increasingly complex and useful counterparts to laboratory experiments within the field of neuroscience. Today several software programs exist to solve the underlying mathematical system of equations, but such programs typically solve these equations in all parts of a cell (or network of cells) simultaneously, regardless of whether or not all of the cell is active. This approach can be inefficient if only part of the cell is active and many simulations must be performed. We have previously developed a numerical method that provides a framework for spatial adaptivity by making the computations local to individual branches rather than entire cells (Rempe and Chopp, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28: 2139–2161, 2006). Once the computation is reduced to the level of branches instead of cells, spatial adaptivity is straightforward: the active regions of the cell are detected and computational effort is focused there, while saving computations in other regions of the cell that are at or near rest. Here we apply the adaptive method to four realistic neuronal simulation scenarios and demonstrate its improved efficiency over non-adaptive methods. We find that the computational cost of the method scales with the amount of activity present in the simulation, rather than the physical size of the system being simulated. For certain problems spatial adaptivity reduces the computation time by up to 80%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral, D. (1993). Emerging principles of intrinsic hippocampal organization. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 3, 225–229.
Bischofberger, J., & Jonas, P. (1997). Action potential propagation into the pre-synaptic dendrites of rat mitral cells. Journal Physiology (London), 504, 359–365.
Bower, J., & Beeman, D. (1998). The Book of Genesis: Exploring realistic neural models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System. Telos: Santa Clara.
Chen, W., Midtgaard, J., & Shepherd, G. (1997). Forward and backward propagation of dendritic impulses and their synaptic control in mitral cells. Science, 278, 463–467.
Connors, B., & Long, M. (2004). Electrical synapses in the mammalian brain. Annual Reviews Neuroscience, 27, 393–418.
Fukuda, T., Kosaka, T., Singer, W., & Galuske, R. (2006). Gap junctions among dendrites of cortical GABAergic neurons establish a dense and widespread intercolumnar network. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(13), 3434–3443.
Golding, N., Kath, W., & Spruston, N. (2001). Dichotomy of action-potential backpropagation in CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2998–3010.
Goldstein, S., & Rall, W. (1974). Changes in action potential shape and velocity for changing core conductor geometry. Biophysical Journal, 14, 731–757.
Häusser, M., Stuart, G., Racca, C., & Sakmann, B. (1995). Axonal initiation and active dendritic propagation of action potentials in substantia nigra neurons. Neuron, 15, 637–647.
Hines, M. (1984). Efficient computation of branched nerve equations. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 15, 69–76.
Hines, M. L., & Carnevale, N. T. (2001). NEURON: a tool for neuroscientists. The Neuroscientist, 7, 123–135.
Hines, M. L., & Carnevale, N. T. (1997). The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Computation, 9, 1179–1209.
Hodgkin, A., & Huxley, A. (1952). A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Journal of Physiology, 117, 500–544.
Hormuzdi, S., Filippov, M., Mitropoulou, G., Monyer, H., & Bruzzone, R. (2004). Electrical synapses: a dynamic signaling system that shapes the activity of neuronal networks. Biochimica Biophysica Acta, 1662, 113–137.
Jarsky, T., Roxin, A., Kath, W., & Spruston, N. (2005). Conditional dendritic spike propagation following distal synaptic activation of hippocampal ca1 pyramidal neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1667–1676.
Kopell, N., & Ermentrout, B. (2004). Chemical and electrical synapses perform complementary roles in the synchronization of interneuronal networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(43), 15482–15487.
Llinas, R., & Sugimori, M. (1980). Electrophysiological properties of in-vitro purkinje cell dendrites in mammalian cerebellar slices. Journal of Physiology (London), 305, 197–213.
Lundqvist, M., Rehn, M., Djurfeldt, M., & Lansner, A. (2006). Attractor dynamics in a modular network model of neocortex. Network-Computation In Neural Systems, 17, 253–276.
Manor, Y., Rinzel, J., Segev, I., & Yarom, Y. (1997). Low-amplitude oscillations in the inferior olive: A model based on electrical coupling of neurons with heterogeneous channel densities. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 2736–2752.
Markram, H. (2006). The Blue Brain Project. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(2), 153–160.
Martina, M., Vida, I., & Jonas, P. (2000). Distal initiation and active propagation of action potentials in interneuron dendrites. Science, 287, 295–300.
Mascagni, M. (1991). A parallelizing algorithm for computing solutions to arbitrarily branched cable neuron models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 36, 105–114.
Migliore, M., Cannia, C., Lytton, W. W., Markram, H., & Hines, M. L. (2006). Parallel network simulations with NEURON. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 21, 119–129.
Rall, W (1977) Core conductor theory and cable properties of neurons. In: Handbook of physiology. The nervous system. Cellular biology of neurons, sect. 1, vol. I. Bethesda, MD: Am Physiol Soc, pp. 39–97.
Rempe, M., & Chopp, D. (2006). A predictor-corrector algorithm for reaction-diffusion equations associated with neural activity on branched structures. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28, 2139–2161.
Roxin, A., Riecke, H., & Solla, S. (2004). Self-sustained activity in a small-world network of excitable neurons. Physical Review Letters, 92(19), 198101–1981011.
Saraga, F., Ng, L., & Skinner, F. (2006). Distal gap junctions and active dendrites can tune network dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 1669–1682.
Saraga, F., & Skinner, F. (2004). Location, location, location (and density) of gap junctions in multi-compartment models. Neurocomputing, 58, 713–719.
Skinner, F., Zhang, L., Velazquez, J. P., & Carlen, P. (1999). Bursting in inhibitory interneuronal networks: A role for gap-junctional coupling. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1274–1283.
Sohl, G., Maxeiner, S., & Willecke, K. (2005). Expression and function of neuronal gap junctions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 191–200.
Stuart, G., & Häusser, M. (1994). Initiation and spread of sodium action potentials in cerebellar purkinje cells. Neuron, 13, 703–712.
Stuart, G., Spruston, N., Sakmann, B., & Häusser, M. (1997). Action potential initiation and backpropagation in neurons of the mammalian cns. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 125–131.
Traub, R., & Bibbig, A. (2000). A model of high-frequency ripples in the hippocampus based on synaptic coupling plus axon-axon gap junctions between pyramidal neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(6), 2086–2093.
Traub, R., Contreras, D., Cunningham, M., Murray, H., LeBeau, F., Roopen, A., et al. (2005). Single-column thalamocortical network model exhibiting gamma oscillations, sleep spindles, and epileptogenic bursts. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2194–2232.
Traub, R., Kopell, N., Bibbig, A., Buhl, E., LeBeau, F., & Whittington, M. (2001). Gap junctions between interneuron dendrites can enhance synchrony of gamma oscillations in distributed networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(23), 9478–9486.
Vetter, P., Roth, A., & Haüsser, M. (2000). Propagation of action potentials in dendrites depends on dendritic morphology. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 926–937.
Zsiros, V., Aradi, I., & Maccaferri, G. (2007). Propagation of postsynaptic currents and potentials via gap junctions in GABAergic networks of the rat hippocampus. Journal of Physiology (London), 578, 527–544.
Acknowledgments
Supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF-IGERT, DGE 9987577 to MJR) and the National Institutes of Health (NS-46064 to NS, WLK, and DLC as part of the Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience Program).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Action Editor: Alain Destexhe
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rempe, M.J., Spruston, N., Kath, W.L. et al. Compartmental neural simulations with spatial adaptivity. J Comput Neurosci 25, 465–480 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-008-0089-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-008-0089-3