Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Let’s get honest about sampling

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular simulations see widespread and increasing use in computation and molecular design, especially within the area of molecular simulations applied to biomolecular binding and interactions, our focus here. However, force field accuracy remains a concern for many practitioners, and it is often not clear what level of accuracy is really needed for payoffs in a discovery setting. Here, I argue that despite limitations of today’s force fields, current simulation tools and force fields now provide the potential for real benefits in a variety of applications. However, these same tools also provide irreproducible results which are often poorly interpreted. Continued progress in the field requires more honesty in assessment and care in evaluation of simulation results, especially with respect to convergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Merz KM Jr (2010) J Chem Theory Comput 6(5):1769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Faver JC, Benson ML, He X, Roberts BP, Wang B, Marshall MS, Kennedy MR, Sherrill CD, Merz KM Jr (2011) J Chem Theory Comput 7(3):790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng Y, Roux B (2008) J Chem Phys 128(11):115103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujitani H, Tanida Y, Matsuura A (2009) Phys Rev E 79(2):21914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karney CFF, Ferrara JE, Brunner S (2005) J Comput Chem 26(3):243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyce SE, Mobley DL, Rocklin GJ, Graves AP, Dill KA, Shoichet BK (2009) J Mol Biol 394(4):747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlick T (2010) Molecular modeling and simulation: an interdisciplinary guide, interdisciplinary applied mathematics, vol 21, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

  8. Mobley DL, Graves AP, Chodera JD, McReynolds A, Shoichet BK, Dill KA (2007) J Mol Biol 371:1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jayachandran G, Shirts MR, Park S, Pande VS (2006) J Chem Phys 125(8):084901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinbrecher T, Case D, Labahn A (2006) J Med Chem 49(6):1837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mobley DL, Dill KA (2009) Structure 17(4):489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mobley DL, Chodera JD, Dill KA (2007) J Chem Theory Comput 3(4):1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallicchio E, Levy RM (2011) Curr Opin Struct Biol 21(2):161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallicchio E, Lapelosa M, Levy RM (2010) J Chem Theory Comput 6(9):2961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luccarelli J, Michel J, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (2010) J Chem Theory Comput 6(12):3850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Michel J, Essex JW (2010) J Comput Aided Mol Des 24:638–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leitgeb M, Schröder C, Boresch S (2005) J Chem Phys 122(8):084109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klimovich P, Mobley DL (2010) J Comput Aided Mol Des 24(4):307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Paluch AS, Mobley DL, Maginn EJ (2011) J Chem Theory Comput 7(9):2910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2011) Science 334(6055):517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dror RO, Pan AC, Arlow DH, Borhani DW, Maragakis P, Shan Y, Xu H, Shaw DE (2011) Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(32):13118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shan Y, Kim ET, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Seeliger MA, Shaw DE (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133(24):9181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mobley DL, Chodera JD, Dill KA (2006) J Chem Phys 125:084902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dolenc J, Oostenbrink C, Koller J, van Gunsteren W (2005) Nucleic Acids Res 33(2):725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shirts MR, Mobley D, Brown SP (2010) In: Merz KM, Ringe D, Reynolds CH (eds) Drug design: structure- and ligand-based approaches, Cambridge University Press

  26. Mobley DL, Dumont É, Chodera JD, Dill K (2007) J Phys Chem B 111(9):2242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mobley DL, Bayly CI, Cooper MD, Shirts MR, Dill KA (2009) J Chem Theory Comput 5(2):350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DLM acknowledges the Louisiana Board of Regents Research Competitiveness and Research Enhancement Subprograms as well as the Louisiana Optical Network Initiative (supported by the Louisiana Board of Regents Post-Katrina Support Fund Initiative grant LEQSF(2007-12)- ENH-PKSFI-PRS-01), and the National Science Foundation under NSF EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement No. EPS-1003897 with additional support from the Louisiana Board of Regents.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lakeshore Drive, New Orleans, LA, 70148, USA

    David L. Mobley

Authors
  1. David L. Mobley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Mobley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mobley, D.L. Let’s get honest about sampling. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26, 93–95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9497-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9497-y

Keywords