Abstract
Revisiting fur trade collections at the Royal Ontario Museum, this essay explores connections and potential interplay between historical archaeology and assemblage theory. With few exceptions, archaeologists studying “modernity” over the last 500 years—including those studying the fur trade—have paid little attention to assemblage theory. Also referred to as “new materialisms,” assemblage theory highlights the qualities and vibrancies of substances, their relationality, and their part in energy flows. These distinctly non-anthropocentric emphases present challenges to standard notions of humanity employed in historical archaeology. Building on this general premise, we experiment with “(re)assembling” historical archaeology by rethinking and reframing aspects of the North American fur trade as it relates to rivers. Archaeological assemblages collected from the beds of several major riverways in Ontario speak to common themes studied in historical archaeology, yet also attest to the ways in which the fur trade depended upon harnessing river power that often acted back in unpredictable and sometimes violent ways. Brought into dialogue with records kept by traders, the collections offer useful perspectives on the deep entanglements between fur trade histories and rivers. From an assemblage perspective, we use these examples to reframe the role of non-human forces in the fur trade and to further challenge dualisms between nature/culture and human/non-human in historical archaeology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The nature of the Canadian portion of the QSURP’s collecting and recordation practices preclude us from drawing precise conclusions about geographic distributions of fur trade materials in rivers; like any archaeological remains, the underwater assemblages at the Royal Ontario Museum are undoubedtly incomplete. But we also lack detailed information on the sampling strategy employed. We know about the areas from which artifacts were collected but much less information is available on the areas of rivers that were not surveyed or did not yield artifacts.
These marks were previously interpreted as B.A.R. Hanson (2010) recently discovered that the reported letter “R” in the “BAR” mark on the Winnipeg River axes was actually a letter “B” in which the bottom leg of the letter had been broken off of the punch.
The British likely introduced iron tomahawks to North America during the eighteenth century and they were used into the early nineteenth century (Peterson 1965: p. 29).
References
Allard, A. (2016). Communities on the move: practice and mobility in the late eighteenth-century western Great Lakes fur trade. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Allard, A. (2018). Communities, survivance and acts of ‘residence’ in the late eighteenth-century fur trade in Minnesota. In H. Walder & J. Yann (Eds.), Encounters, exchange, entanglements: current perspectives on intercultural interactions throughout the western Great Lakes (pp. 67–86) Midwest Archaeological Conference, Occasional Papers No. 2.
Allard, A., and Cipolla C. N. (2018). The view from watery places: rivers and portages in the fur trade era. Open Rivers: Rethinking Water, Place, and Community. Online publication.
Allard, A., and Cipolla C. N. (n.d.). Failure and colonialism in the North American fur trade: the view from a riverine assemblage. Historical Archaeology, Manuscript in process.
Anderson, D. L. (1994). The flow of European trade goods into the western Great Lakes region, 1715-1760. In J. S. H. Brown, W. J. Eccles, & D. P. Hedelman (Eds.), The fur trade revisited: selected papers of the 6th North American fur trade conference, Mackinac Island, Michigan, 1991 (pp. 93–115). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Birk, D. A. (1991). French presence in Minnesota: the view from site Mo20 near Little Falls. In J. A. Walthall (Ed.), French colonial archaeology: the Illinois country and the western Great Lakes (pp. 237–266). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Birk, D. A. (1993). Nanda-Wendji-Gewin: looking for … ways to envision and interpret the Ojibwe-European fur trade in the Minnesota area. Minneapolis: Institute for Minnesota Archaeology.
Birk, D. A. (1994). When rivers were roads: deciphering the role of canoe portages in the western lake superior fur trade. In J. S. Brown, W. J. Eccles, & D. P. Heldman (Eds.), The fur trade revisited: selected papers of the sixth North American Fur trade conference, Mackinac Island, Michigan, 1991 (pp. 359–376). East Lansing/Mackinac Island: Michigan State University Press.
Birk, D.A. (1999). The archaeology of Sayer’s Fort: an 1804–1805 North West Company wintering quarters site in East-Central Minnesota. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Bourinot, J. (Ed.). (1900). Diary of Nicholas Garry, deputy-governor of the Hudson's Bay Company from 1822–1835: a detailed narrative of his travels in the northwest territories of British North America in 1821. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada.
Brown, J. S. H. (1980). Strangers in blood. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Cipolla, C. N. (2018). Earth flows and lively stone. What differences does ‘vibrant’ matter make? Archaeological Dialogues, 25(1), 49–70.
Coues, E. (Ed.). (1897). New light on the early history of the greater northwest: the manuscript journals of Alexander Henry and of David Thompson, 1799–1814 (Vol. 1). New York: Francis P. Harper.
Crellin, R. J. (2017). Changing assemblages: vibrant matter in burial assemblages. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 111–125.
Crossland, Z. (2013). Signs of mission: material semiosis and nineteenth-century Tswana architecture. Signs and Society, 1(1), 79–113.
Deetz, J. (1996). In small things forgotten: the archaeology of early American life. New York: Anchor.
DeLanda, M. (2000). A thousand years of nonlinear history. Brooklyn: Zone Books.
DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: asemblage theory and social complexity. London: Bloomsbury.
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Devine, H. (2004). The people who own themselves: aboriginal ethnogenesis in a Canadian family, 1660–1900. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Edgeworth, M. (2011). Fluid pasts: archaeologies of flow. London: Bloomsbury.
Edgeworth, M. (2014). On the agency of rivers. Archaeological Dialogues, 21(02), 157–159.
Edgeworth, M., & Benjamin, J. (2017). What is a river? The Chicago River as hyperobject. In J. Kelly, P. Scarpino, H. Berry, J. Syvitski, & M. Meybeck (Eds.), Rivers of the Anthropocene (pp. 162–175). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Englebert, R. (2008). Merchant representatives and the French river world, 1763-1803. Michigan Historical Review, 34(1), 63–82.
Fowles, S. (2016). The perfect subject (postcolonial object studies). Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), 9–27.
Gates, C. M. (Ed.). (1933). Five fur traders of the Northwest: being the narrative of Peter Pond and the diaries of John Macdonnell, Archibald N. McLeod, Hugh Faries, and Thomas Connor, with an Introduction by Grace Lee Nute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Given, M. (2018). The precarious conviviality of water mills. Archaeological Dialogues, 25(1), 71–94.
Hall, M., & Silliman, S. W. (Eds.). (2006). Historical archaeology. Malden: Wiley.
Hamilakis, Y. (2017). Sensorial assemblages: affect, memory and temporality in assemblage thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 169–182.
Hamilakis, Y., & Jones, A. M. (2017). Archaeology and assemblage. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 77–84.
Hanson, J. (2010). BAB. Museum of Fur Trade Querterly, 46(2), 4–6.
Harris, O. J. T. (2017). Assemblages and scale in archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 127–139.
Harris, O. J. T., & Cipolla, C. N. (2017). Archaeological theory in the new millennium. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2007). Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1), 1–16.
Innis, H. A. (1999). The fur trade in Canada: an introduction to Canadian economic history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kenyon, W. A. (1969). Our submerged archives. Rotunda, 2(2), 4–13.
Kenyon, W. A. (1975). The Quetico report. In R. C. Wheeler, W. A. Kenyon, A. R. Woolworth, & D. A. Birk (Eds.), Voices from the rapids: an underwater search for fur trade artifacts 1960–1973, Minnesota Historical Archaeology Series No. 3. (pp. 45–54). St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macfie, J. (1962). A short river reveals evidence of its long history. The Beaver Winter, 48–51.
Mann, R. (2003). Colonizing the colonizers: Canadien fur traders and fur trade society in the Great Lakes region 1763–1850. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton, NY: State University of New York Binghamton.
Mann, R. (2017). ‘They Are Fit to Eat the Divel and Smoak His Mother’: labor, leisure, tobacco pipes, and smoking customs among French Canadian voyageurs during the fur trade era. In E. Scott (Ed.), Archaeological perspectives on the French in the New World (pp. 58–82). Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
Mann, R. (2018). People, portages, and powerful places: Miami Indians at the forks of the Wabash during the War of 1812 era. In Walder H and Yann J (Eds.), Encounters, exchange, entanglements: current perspectives on intercultural interactions throughout the western Great Lakes, (pp. 87-104). Midwest Archaeological Conference, Occasional Papers No. 2.
Megill, D. K. (1963). Underwater finds in the French River. Canadian Geographical Journal, LXVII(2), 48–53.
Mrozowski, S. A. (1999). Colonization and the commodification of nature. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 3(3), 153–166.
Mrozowski, S. A., Herbster, H., Brown, D., & Priddy, K. L. (2009). Magunkaquog materiality, federal recognition, and the search for a deeper history. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 13(4), 430–463.
Nassaney, M. S. (2008). Identity formation at a French colonial outpost in the North American interior. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 12, 291–318.
Nassaney, M. S. (2015). The archaeology of the North American fur trade. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Olsen, B. (2010). In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. New York: AltaMira.
Olsen, B., & Witmore, C. (2015). Archaeology, symmetry and the ontology of things. A response to critics. Archaeological Dialogues, 22(2), 187–197.
Orser Jr., C. E. (2010). Twenty-first-century historical archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 18(2), 111–150.
Peers, L., & Schenck, T. (Eds.). (2002). My first years in the fur trade: the journals of George Nelson 1802–1804. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
Peterson, H.L. (1965). American Indian Tomahawks. Contributions from the Museum of the American Indian. New York: Heye Foundation.
Peterson, J. (1985). Many roads to the Red River: Métis genesis in the Great Lakes region 1680-1815. In J. Peterson & J. S. H. Brown (Eds.), The new peoples: being and becoming Métis in North America (pp. 37–71). Winnipeg: The University of Manitoba Press.
Podruchny, C. (2006). Making the voyageur world: travelers and traders in the North American fur trade. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ray, A. J., & Freeman, D. B. (1978). “Give us good measure”: an economic analysis of relations between the Indians and the Hudson’s Bay Company before 1763. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Schuyler, R. L. (Ed.) (1978) Historical archaeology: a guide to substantive and theoretical contributions. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
Sleeper-Smith, S. (2001). Indian women and French men: Rethinking cultural encounter in the western Great Lakes. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Strang, V. (2014). Fluid consistencies. Material relationality in human engagements with water. Archaeological Dialogues, 21(2), 133–150.
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Van Kirk, S. (1980). “Many tender ties”: women in fur-trade society, 1670–1870. Winnipeg: Watson & Dwyer Publishing Ltd.
Watts, C. (Ed.). (2013). Relational archaeologies. New York: Routledge.
Wheeler, R. C. (1962). Diving into the past. Canadian Geographical Journal, LXV(2), 38–49.
Wheeler, R. C., & Birk, D. A. (1975). Historical introduction. In R. C. Wheeler, W. A. Kenyon, A. R. Woolworth, & D. A. Birk (Eds.), Voices from the rapids: an underwater search for fur trade artifacts 1960–1973, Minnesota Historical Archaeology Series No. 3 (pp. 1–6). St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society.
Wheeler, R. C., Kenyon, W. A., Woolworth, A., Birk, D. A. (Eds.) (1975) Voices from the rapids: an underwater search for fur trade artifacts 1960–1973. Minnesota Historical Archaeology Series No. 3. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society.
White, R. (1991). The middle ground: Indians, empires and the republics in the Great Lakes region 1650–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, B. (1999). The woman who married a beaver: trade patterns and gender roles in the Ojibway fur trade. Ethnohistory, 46(1), 109–147.
Witmore, C. (2015). Archaeology and the new materialisms. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1(2), 203–246.
Woolworth, A. R., Douglas, A., & Birk, D. A. (1975). Description of the artifacts. In R. C. Wheeler, W. A. Kenyon, A. R. Woolworth, & D. A. Birk (Eds.), Voices from the rapids: an underwater search for fur trade artifacts 1960–1973, Minnesota Historical Archaeology Series No. 3 (pp. 55–93). St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society.
Zedeño, M. N., & Stoffle, R. W. (2003). Tracking the role of pathways in the evolution of a human landscape: the St. Croix riverway in ethnohistorical perspective. In M. Rockman & J. Steele (Eds.), Colonization of unfamiliar landscapes: the archaeology of adaptation (pp. 59–80). New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
Amélie’s research at the ROM is funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada’s postdoctoral research fellowship (grant no. 756-2017-0638). We thank Sarah Horn and Molly Minnick for providing technical support for this research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard tojurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cipolla, C.N., Allard, A. Recognizing River Power: Watery Views of Ontario’s Fur Trade. J Archaeol Method Theory 26, 1084–1105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9405-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9405-z