Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Training clinicians in culturally relevant care: a curriculum to improve knowledge and comfort with the transgender and gender diverse population

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To design a replicable simulation curriculum collaboratively with the transgender and gender diverse community to improve clinician knowledge and comfort with providing reproductive care to this population.

Methods

This is a prospective, single arm pre-post analysis of obstetrics and gynecology residents at a single academic institution after completion of a novel simulation curriculum. The primary outcome was the change in resident comfort and knowledge in providing transgender and gender diverse patient care. A thematic analysis of learner and standardized patient free text responses was analyzed for insights on perceived learner experiences.

Results

This curriculum was created with iterative feedback from the transgender community and involved only transgender and gender diverse-identified standardized patients. Thirty residents participated, with 22 responding to both the pre-and post-curriculum surveys, and 11 responding to a 6-month post-curriculum survey. There were significant improvements in learner comfort and knowledge after participation that were found to persist at 6 months. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that this was a positive and powerful learning experience for both residents and standardized patients.

Conclusions

This simulation curriculum may be an effective and impactful tool to increase trainee comfort and knowledge of transgender and gender diverse patient care, which is important given the lack of physician training in the care for these individuals. By building the foundation with resident learners, the ultimate goal is to enhance the pool of clinicians confident and capable of caring for transgender and gender diverse patients, to increase access to care, and to improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James S, Herman JL, Rankin S, Keisling M, Mottet L, Anafi M. The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality. 2016.

  2. Diemer E, Grant JD, Munn-Chernoff MA, Patterson DA, Duncan AE. Gender identity, sexual orientation, and eating-related pathology in a national sample of college students. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(2):144–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chodzen G, Hidalgo MA, Chen D, Garofalo R. Minority stress factors associated with depression and anxiety among transgender and gender-nonconforming youth. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(4):467–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seelman K, Colón-Diaz MJ, LeCroix RH, Xavier-Brier M, Kattari L. Transgender noninclusive healthcare and delaying care because of fear: connections to general health and mental health among transgender adults. Transgender Health. 2017;2(1):17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health. West Hollywood, CA: The Trevor Project. 2021.

  6. Mahowald L, Gruberg S, Halpin J. The state of the LGBTQ community in 2020: a national public opinion study. 2020.

  7. Herman J, Brown TN, Haas AP. Suicide thoughts and attempts among transgender adults: findings from the 2015 US transgender survey. 2019.

  8. Parikh N, Chattha A, Gargollo P, Granberg C. Fertility preservation: a tale of two testicles. Urology. 2021;153:298–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen D, Matson M, Macapagal K, et al. Attitudes toward fertility and reproductive health among transgender and gender-nonconforming adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63(1):62–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn G, Sanchez JA, Sutton SK, Vadaparampil ST, Nguyen GT, Green BL, et al. Cancer and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) populations. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(5):384–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peitzmeier S, Khullar K, Reisner SL, Potter J. Pap test use is lower among female-to-male patients than non-transgender women. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(6):808–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weyers S, Garland SM, Cruickshank M, Kyrgiou M, Arbyn M. Cervical cancer prevention in transgender men: a review. BJOG. 2021;128(5):822–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenberg M, Gower AL, McMorris BJ, Rider GN, Shea G, Coleman E. Risk and protective factors in the lives of transgender/gender nonconforming adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(4):521–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. di Giacomo E, Krausz M, Colmegna F, Aspesi F, Clerici M. Estimating the risk of attempted suicide among sexual minority youths: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(12):1145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer I. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(5):674–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendricks M, Testa RJ. A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients: an adaptation of the Minority Stress Model. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2012;43(5):460–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. An epidemic of violence: fatal violence against transgender and gender non-confirming people in the United States in 2020. Human Rights Campaign Foundation. 2020.

  18. Dendrinos M, Budrys NM, Sangha R. Addressing the needs of transgender patients: how gynecologists can partner in their care. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019;74(1):33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaffee K, Shires DA, Stroumsa D. Discrimination and delayed health care among transgender women and men: implications for improving medical education and health care delivery. Med Care. 2016;54(11):1010–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kattari S, Atteberry-Ash B, Kinney MK, Walls NE, Kattari L. One size does not fit all: differential transgender health experiences. Soc Work Health Care. 2019;58(9):899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baldwin A, Dodge B, Schick VR, Light B, Scharrs PW, Herbenick D, et al. Transgender and genderqueer individuals’ experiences with health care providers: what’s working, what’s not, and where do we go from here? J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(4):1300–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Das R, Drolet BC. Training Surgery Residents in Gender-Affirming Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2022.

  23. Poteat T, German D, Kerrigan D. Managing uncertainty: a grounded theory of stigma in transgender health care encounters. Soc Sci Med. 2013;84:22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Health care for transgender and gender diverse individuals: ACOG committee opinion, number 823. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2021.

  25. Qin L, Estevez SL, Radcliffe E, Shan WW, Rabin JM, Rosenthal DW. Are obstetrics and gynecology residents equipped to care for transgender and gender nonconforming patients? A national survey study Transgend Health. 2021;6(4):194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guerrero-Hall K, Muscanell R, Garg N, Romero IL, Chor J. Obstetrics and gynecology resident physician experiences with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer healthcare training. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(2):599–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Access to fertility services by transgender and nonbinary persons: an Ethics Committee opinion. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.2021.

  28. Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: transforming theory into practice. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):161–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaba D. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;1:i2-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schabath M, Blackburn CA, Sutter ME, et al. National survey of oncologists at national cancer institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers: attitudes, knowledge, and practice behaviors about LGBTQ patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(7):547–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Worly B, Manriquez M, Stagg A, Blanchard MH, Ogburn T, Carson SA, et al. Sexual health education in obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) residencies-a resident physician survey. J Sex Med. 2021;18(6):1042–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vinekar K, Rush SK, Chiang S, Schiff MA. Educating obstetrics and gynecology residents on transgender patients: a survey of program directors. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):691–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mehta P, Easter SR, Potter J, Castleberry N, Schulkin J, Robinson JN. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health: obstetrician-gynecologists’ training, attitudes, knowledge, and practice. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018;27(12):1459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnston C, Shearer LS. Internal medicine resident attitudes, prior education, comfort, and knowledge regarding delivering comprehensive primary care to transgender patients. Transgend Health. 2017;2(1):91–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang J, Gardner IH, Walker JA, Safer JD. Observed deficiencies in medical student knowledge of transgender and intersex health. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(8):897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Korpaisarn S, Safer JD. Gaps in transgender medical education among healthcare providers: a major barrier to care for transgender persons. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2018;19(3):271–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dubin S, Nolan IT, Streed CG Jr, Greene RE, Radix AE, Morrison SD. Transgender health care: improving medical students’ and residents’ training and awareness. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:377–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Solotke M, Sitkin NA, Schwartz ML, Encandela JA. Twelve tips for incorporating and teaching sexual and gender minority health in medical school curricula. Med Teach. 2019;41(2):141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Koch A, Ritz M, Morrow A, Grier K, McMillian-Bohler JM. Role-play simulation to teach nursing students how to provide culturally sensitive care to transgender patients. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;54:103123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McEwing E. Delivering culturally competent care to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) population: education for nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;94:104573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ozkara SE. The influence of the oncology-focused transgender-simulated patient simulation on nursing students’ cultural competence development. Nurs Forum. 2020;55(4):621–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Maruca A, Diaz DA, Stockmann C, Gonzalez L. Using simulation with nursing students to promote affirmative practice toward the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender population: a multisite study. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018;39(4):225–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Muckler V, Leonard R, Cicero EC. Transgender simulation scenario pilot project. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019;26:44–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McCave E, Aptaker D, Hartmann KD, Zucconi R. Promoting affirmative transgender health care practice within hospitals: an IPE standardized patient simulation for graduate health care learners. MedEdPORTAL. 2019;15:10861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ruud M, Demma JM, Woll A, Miller JM, Hoffman S, Avery MD. Health history skills for interprofessional learners in transgender and nonbinary populations. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021;66(6):778–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bohnert C, Combs RM, Noonan EJ, Weathers AE, Weingartner LA. Gender minorities in simulation: a mixed methods study of medical school standardized patient programs in the United States and Canada. Simul Healthc. 2021;1(16):e151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Greene R, Blasdel G, Cook TE, Gillespie C. How do OSCE cases activate learners about transgender health? Acad Med. 2020;95:S156–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Greene R, Hanley K, Cook TE, Gillespie C, Zabar S. Meeting the primary care needs of transgender patients through simulation. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(3):380–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu J, Lee S, Kim M, Lee J, Park I. Changes in medical students’ self-assessments of clinical communication skills after clinical practice and standardized patient feedback. Acad Psychiatry. 2020;44(2):272–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sherman J, Johnson CD. Assessment of pharmacy students’ patient care skills using case scenarios with a SOAP note grading rubric and standardized patient feedback. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019;11(5):513–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Riopel M, Litwin B, Silberman N, Fernandez-Fernandez A. Promoting professional behaviours in physical therapy students using standardized patient feedback. Physiother Can. 2019;71(2):160–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Doyle Howley L, Martindale J. The efficacy of standardized patient feedback in clinical teaching: a mixed methods analysis. Med Educ Online. 2004;9(1):4356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Alpert A, CichoskiKelly EM, Fox AD. What lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex patients say doctors should know and do: a qualitative study. J Homosex. 2017;64(10):1368–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Baquet C, Bromwell JL, Hall MB, Frego JF. Rural community-academic partnership model for community engagement and partnered research. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013;7(3):281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the following people for their help in organizing, running, and facilitating this curriculum: Jennifer Blakemore, MD: NYU Langone Fertility Center; Fabio Ferrari, MD: Bay Area Ob-Gyn, Women’s Care Florida; Kevin Moore, BSN, RN: NYU Langone Health; Jessica Rose, MD: NYU School of Medicine; Olga Smuklavsky: NYU School of Medicine. No compensation was received by any of the aforementioned contributors.

Funding

The simulation was funded by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at New York University Langone Medical Center. Partial funding was provided from the NIH/NCI R25CA142519 supplement (MPIs Quinn & Vadaparampil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Fabiana Maria Kreines was involved in simulation creation and administration, data collection and analysis, and was the primary writer of the manuscript. Gwendolyn P. Quinn was involved in simulation creation, funding acquisition, supervision of data collection and analysis, and review/editing of the manuscript. Stefanie Cardamone was involved in simulation creation, funding acquisition, and review/editing of the manuscript. Guillermo E Pi was involved in simulation creation and review/editing of the manuscript. Tiffany Cook was involved in simulation creation and administration, data collection, and review/editing of the manuscript. Caroline Salas Humara was involved in simulation creation and administration and review/editing of the manuscript. Elizabeth Fino was involved in simulation creation and administration and review/editing of the manuscript. Jacquelyn Shaw was involved in simulation creation and administration, data collection and analysis, and both writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiana Maria Kreines.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the NYU Grossman School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (i19-02014_CR2).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kreines, F.M., Quinn, G.P., Cardamone, S. et al. Training clinicians in culturally relevant care: a curriculum to improve knowledge and comfort with the transgender and gender diverse population. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 2755–2766 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02655-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02655-1

Keywords

Navigation