Skip to main content
Log in

The role of endometrial staining for CD138 as a marker of chronic endometritis in predicting live birth

  • Reproductive Physiology and Disease
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chronic endometritis (CE) is diagnosed via endometrial biopsy and staining for plasma cells. A threshold plasma cell count that identifies CE and predicts pregnancy outcomes has not been established, and the prevalence of plasma cells in the general infertile population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of plasma cells in the general infertile population and whether a threshold exists which predicts live birth.

Methods

Endometrial samples were obtained prospectively from 80 women undergoing IVF, embedded in paraffin, and stained for plasma cells using mouse mono-clonal antibody for CD138. Slides were reviewed at 20× magnification and 10 random images captured. Three reviewers graded each image for plasma cells. Participants underwent single, euploid, and frozen blastocyst transfer.

Results

Forty-nine percent of samples had ≥1 plasma cell across 10 HPFs, 11% had ≥5 cells across 10 HPFs, and 4% had ≥10 cells across 10 HPFs. There was no difference in prevalence between those who did and did not achieve live birth. Using thresholds of 1, 5, and 10 plasma cells per 10 HPFs, there were no differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, or live birth rates between patients with and without CE.

Conclusion

Endometrial plasma cells are present in half the general infertile population and do not predict implantation, clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, or live birth rates at low levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly in order to protect the privacy of the individuals who participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Alecsandru D, et al. Maternal KIR haplotype influences live birth rate after double embryo transfer in IVF cycles in patients with recurrent miscarriages and implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(12):2637–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Franasiak, J.M., et al., Investigating the impact of the timing of blastulation on implantation: management of embryo-endometrial synchrony improves outcomes. Hum Reprod Open 2018. 2018(4):hoy022

  3. Franasiak JM, Scott RT Jr. Reproductive tract microbiome in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1364–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McQueen DB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic endometritis and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):927–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwood SM, Moran JJ. Chronic endometritis: morphologic and clinical observations. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;58(2):176–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitaya K, Yasuo T. Immunohistochemistrical and clinicopathological characterization of chronic endometritis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;66(5):410–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bayer-Garner IB, Nickell JA, Korourian S. Routine syndecan-1 immunohistochemistry aids in the diagnosis of chronic endometritis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128(9):1000–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y, et al. Comparison of the prevalence of chronic endometritis as determined by means of different diagnostic methods in women with and without reproductive failure. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):832–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zolghadri J, et al. The value of hysteroscopy in diagnosis of chronic endometritis in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;155(2):217–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y-Q, et al. Analysis of the diagnostic value of CD138 for chronic endometritis, the risk factors for the pathogenesis of chronic endometritis and the effect of chronic endometritis on pregnancy: a cohort study. BMC Women’s Health. 2016;16(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouet P-E, et al. Chronic endometritis in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure: prevalence and role of office hysteroscopy and immunohistochemistry in diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):106–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McQueen, D.B., et al., Redefining chronic endometritis: the importance of endometrial stromal changes. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(3):855–861

  13. Groth JV. Chronic endometritis and the plasma cell, fact versus fiction. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiegs AW, et al. A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing–based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(3):627–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cicinelli E, et al. Prevalence of chronic endometritis in repeated unexplained implantation failure and the IVF success rate after antibiotic therapy. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasius JC, et al. The reliability of the histological diagnosis of endometritis in asymptomatic IVF cases: a multicenter observer study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cicinelli E, et al. Chronic endometritis: correlation among hysteroscopic, histologic, and bacteriologic findings in a prospective trial with 2190 consecutive office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):677–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hitschmann F, Adler L. Die lehre von der endometritis. Ztschr F Geburtsh Gynäk. 1907;60:63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dumoulin, J. and P. Hughesdon, Chronic endometritis. BJOG 1951. 58(2): 222-235

  20. Johnston-MacAnanny EB, et al. Chronic endometritis is a frequent finding in women with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):437–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang R, et al. The hysteroscopy and histological diagnosis and treatment value of chronic endometritis in recurrent implantation failure patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(6):1363–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors listed on this manuscript contributed meaningfully to the conception of the study, data acquisition, and writing of the final manuscript. All authors approved of the final manuscript prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. S. Herlihy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the study from Western IRB (Protocol RMA-2018-01).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herlihy, N.S., Klimczak, A.M., Titus, S. et al. The role of endometrial staining for CD138 as a marker of chronic endometritis in predicting live birth. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 473–479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02374-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02374-z

Keywords

Navigation