Abstract
Due to the myriad of problems associated with autism, parents often consider alternative treatments. The investigation was undertaken to determine the effects of the Tomatis Method on language skills in children with autism utilizing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The results indicated that although the majority of the children demonstrated general improvement in language over the course of the study, it did not appear to be related to the treatment condition. The percent change for Group 1 (Placebo/Treatment) for treatment was 17.41%, and placebo was 24.84%. Group 2 (Treatment/Placebo) showed −3.98% change for treatment and 14.15% change for placebo. The results reflect a lack of improvement in language using the Tomatis Method for children with autism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Counseling families who choose complementary and alternative medicine for their child with chronic illness or disability. Committee on Children with Disabilities. Pediatrics, 107(3), 598–601.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 397–422.
Berard, G. (1993). Hearing equals behavior. New Canaan, CT: Keats.
Birnbrauer, J. S., & Leach, D. J. (1993). The murdoch early intervention program after 2 years. Behaviour Change, 10(2), 63–74.
Brownell, R. (2000). Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.) Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
Dawson, G., & Watling, R. (2000). Interventions to facilitate auditory, visual, and motor integration in autism: a review of the evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(5), 415–421.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). The peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.) Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Publishing.
Eikeseth, S., Smith, T., Jahr, E., & Eldevik, S. (2002). Intensive behavioral treatment at school for 4- to 7-year-old children with autism. A 1-year comparison controlled study. Behavior Modification, 26(1), 49–68.
Eldevik, S., Eikeseth, S., Jahr, E., & Smith, T. (2006). Effects of low-intensity behavioral treatment for children with autism and mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 211–224.
Gervais, H., Belin, P., Boddaert, N., Leboyer, M., Coez, A., & Sfaello, I., et al. (2004). Abnormal cortical voice processing in autism. Nature Neuroscience, 7(8), 801–802.
Kellerman, G. R., & Gorman, J. M. (2005). Auditory abnormalities in autism: Toward functional distinctions among findings. CNS Spectrums, 10(9), 748–756.
Lepisto, T., Kujala, T., Vanhala, R., Alku, P., Huotilainen, M., & Naatanen, R. (2005). The discrimination of and orienting to speech and non-speech sounds in children with autism. Brain Research, 1066(1–2), 147–157.
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Rissi, S. (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule-WPS. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 3–9.
McEachin, J. J., Smith, T., & Lovaas, O. I. (1993). Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 97(4), 359–372, discussion 373–391.
Neysmith-Roy, J. M. (2001). The Tomatis Method with severely autistic boys: Individual case studies of behavioural changes. South African Journal of Psychology, 31(1), 19–28.
Rogers, S. J. (1998). Empirically supported comprehensive treatments for young children with autism. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27(2), 168–179.
Samson, F., Mottron, L., Jemel, B., Belin, P., & Ciocca, V. (2006). Can spectro-temporal complexity explain the autistic pattern of performance on auditory tasks? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 65–76.
Smith, T., Groen, A. D., & Wynn, J. W. (2000). Randomized trial of intensive early intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 105(4), 269–285.
Tecchio, F., Benassi, F., Zappasodi, F., Gialloreti, L. E., Palermo, M., Seri, S., et al. (2003). Auditory sensory processing in autism: A magnetoencephalographic study. Biological Psychiatry, 54(6), 647–654.
Thompson, B. M., & Andrews, S. R. (2000). An historical commentary on the physiological effects of music: Tomatis, Mozart and neuropsychology. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 35(3), 174–188.
Thorndike, R., Hagen, E., & Sattler, J. (1986). The Stanford-Binet intelligence scale (4th ed., SB4). Itasca, IL: The Riverside Publishing Company.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the families of those children who participated in our research who committed to nearly 1 year of assessments and treatments. Funding was provided by the University of California, Davis M.I.N.D. Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corbett, B.A., Shickman, K. & Ferrer, E. Brief Report: The Effects of Tomatis Sound Therapy on Language in Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 38, 562–566 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0413-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0413-1