Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Multitrait–Multisource Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach to the Construct Validity of ADHD and ODD Rating Scales with Malaysian Children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to model a multitrait by multisource matrix to determine the convergent and discriminant validity of measures of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-inattention (IN), ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in 917 Malaysian elementary school children. The three trait factors were ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD. The two source factors were parents and teachers. Similar to earlier studies with Australian and Brazilian children, the parent and teacher measures failed to show convergent and discriminant validity with Malaysian children. The study outlines the implications of such strong source effects in ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD measures for the use of such parent and teacher scales to study the symptom dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abikoff, H., Courtney, M., Pelham, W. E., Jr., & Koplewicz, H. S. (1993). Teachers’ ratings of disruptive behaviors: The influence of halo effects. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A. (2003). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 75–143). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, J., Keenan, K., & Faraone, S. V. (1990). Parent-based diagnosis of attention deficit disorder predicts a diagnosis based on teacher report. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 698–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. L. (2000). Problem of item overlap between the Psychopathy Screening Device and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder rating scales. Psychological Assessment, 12, 447–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. L., Boe, B., Walsh, J. A., Sommers-Flanagan, R., & Teegarden, L. A. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis on the DSM-IV ADHD and ODD symptoms: What is the best model for the organization of these symptoms? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 339–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. L., Gomez, R., Walsh, J. A., & Moura, M. A. (2003). Understanding source effects in ADHD rating scales: Reply to DuPaul (2003). Psychological Assessment, 15, 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. L., & Haynes, S. N. (in press). Clinical psychology: Construct validation with multiple sources of information and multiple settings. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of psychological measurement: A multimethod perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Burns, G. L., & Walsh, J. A. (2002). The influence of ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms on the development of oppositional defiant disorder symptoms in a 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D. (2000). The multitrait–multimethod matrix as synopsis and recapitulation of Campbell’s views on the proper conduct of social inquiry. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell’s legacy (Vol. 2. pp. 37–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. S., Ostrander, R., Chen, R. S., & August, G. J. (2001). Multimethod assessment of psychopathology among DSM-IV subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Burraston, B., & Li, F. (2002). Family management practices: Research design and measurement issues. In Z. Sloboda & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Handbook for drug abuse prevention: Theory, science, and practice (pp. 587–607). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul, G. J. (2003). Assessment of ADHD symptoms: Comment on Gomez et al. (2003). Psychological Assessment, 15, 115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul, G. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Power, T. J., Reid, R., McGoey, K. E., & Ikeda, M. J. (1998). Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms: Factor structure, normative data, and psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Reid, R., McGoey, K. E., & Ikeda, M. J. (1997). Teacher ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Factor structure and normative data. Psychological Assessment, 9, 436–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., Harvey, J., Quick, C., Scharer, I., & Harris, G. (1999). DSM-IV AD/HD: Confirmatory factor models, prevalence, and gender and age differences based on parent and teacher ratings of Australian primary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., & Moura, M. A. (2003). Trait, source and error variance in ADHD symptoms in Australian and Brazilian Children: A multitrait–multisource confirmatory factor analytic approach to the construct validity of ADHD rating scales. Psychological Assessment, 15, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, P. E., Dedrick, R. F., Prange, M. E., & Friedman, R. M. (1994). Parent, teacher, and child ratings of problem behaviors of youngsters with serious emotional disturbances. Psychological Assessment, 6, 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organization Research Methods, 2, 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. N., & O’Brien, W. H. (2000). Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., & Scullen, S. E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait–multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhorne, J. E., Loney, J., Paternite, C. E., & Bechtoldt, H. P. (1976). Childhood hyperkinesis: A return to the source. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, B. S., Smith, B. H., & Pelham, W. E. (2001). Factor structure and criterion validity of secondary school teacher ratings of ADHD and ODD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2004). Mplus User’s Guide (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The effect of using item parcels on confirmatory factor analysis: An example using Sarason’s reactions to tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasser, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2003). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 729–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillow, D. R., Pelham, W. E., Jr., Hoza, B., Molina, B. S. G., & Schultz, C. H. (1999). Confirmatory factor analyses examining attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms and other childhood disruptive behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 293-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J., Quittner, A. L., & Abikoff, H. (1998). Factors influencing elementary school teachers’ rating of ADHD and ODD behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 406-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. C., & Kandel, D. (1997). In the eye of the beholder? Parental ratings of externalizing and internalizing symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Leonard Burns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomez, R., Burns, G.L., Walsh, J.A. et al. A Multitrait–Multisource Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach to the Construct Validity of ADHD and ODD Rating Scales with Malaysian Children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 33, 241–254 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-1831-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-1831-1

Keywords

Navigation