Abstract
Technology and Design was introduced at Key Stage 3 for all pupils in Northern Ireland, as a result of the Education Reform (NI) Order in 1989. Central to the process of introducing this new and compulsory subject, the government spent in excess of £167M to make provision for the subject in all post-primary schools. This paper explores the perceptions of teachers of Technology and Design (known as Design and Technology in GB) in post-primary schools throughout Northern Ireland to the introduction and implementation of the subject. The methods involved a questionnaire survey to all teachers of Technology and Design throughout Northern Ireland (n = 587) and one-to-one interviews with 24. Findings suggest that teachers consider Technology and Design to be a worthwhile subject and believe that it adds much to the educational experience of the pupils involved. Nonetheless, there is general acceptance that difficulties surround the whole issue of subject definition and content delineation. As a consequence, significant demands are placed upon these teachers as they work to ensure that all pupils are given a worthwhile and valuable learning experience. These findings are discussed in terms of teachers’ perceptions of subject definition, delineation of subject content, the nature of the work involved and issues related to academic ability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1994). Statistics for psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ, London: Prentice Hall.
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (1999). “No one forgets a good teacher!”—What do ‘good’ technology teachers know? Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4(3), 223–229.
Barlex, D. (1998). Design and Technology—the Nuffield perspective in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 139–150.
Barlex, D. (2000). Preparing D&T for 2005—moving beyond the rhetoric: The DATA lecture. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(1), 5–15.
Barnett, M. (1994). Designing the Future? Technology, values and choice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 51–63.
Benson, C. (2003). Times change and we change with them, or do we? A new paradigm for Design and Technology. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 7(3), 165–171.
Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1985). In place of confusion: Technology and Science in the school curriculum. Nottingham: Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust.
Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1995). Technological capability. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology. London: Routledge.
Bryman, A. B., & Burgess, R. G. (1994). Reflections on qualitative data analysis. In A. B. Bryman, & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
Custer, R. L. (1995). Examining the dimensions of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 219–244.
DENI. (1988). Education Reform in Northern Ireland :The way forward. Bangor, Northern Ireland: Department of Education for Northern Ireland.
DENI. (2001a). The Education Reform Programme: Survey of Science and Technology and Design 1999–2000. Bangor, Northern Ireland: Department of Education for Northern Ireland.
DENI. (2001b). Improving Technology and Design in post-primary schools 2001. Bangor, Northern Ireland: Department of Education for Northern Ireland.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
Eggleston, J. (1993). The politics of technology education. Design and Technology Association Teaching, 3(2), 59–64.
Eggleston, J. (1995). What is design and technology education? In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology. London: Routledge.
Evans, L. (1998). Jack-of-all-trades, master of none? An examination of subject skills provision on Technology (secondary) initial teacher education courses in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 15–35.
Gardner, P. L. (1994). The relationship between Technology and Science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part I. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 123–153.
Gardner, P. L. (1995). The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part II. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 1–33.
Ginns, I. S., Norton, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Davis, R. S. (2007). Can twenty years of technology education assist “grass roots” syllabus implementation? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 197–215.
Griffiths, A. K., & Parsons-Heath, N. (1996). High school students’ views about technology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(2), 141–151.
Hansen, R., & Froelich, M. (1994). Defining technology and technological education: A crisis, or cause for celebration? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 179–207.
HMSO. (1992). Technology and design: Programmes of study and attainment target. Belfast: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1996). Perceptions about technology held by primary teachers in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(1), 43–54.
Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1998). Factors that influence children’s developing perceptions about technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 261–279.
Jephcote, M., & Hendley, D. (1995). How Design and Technology can contribute to the development of pupils’ economic and industrial understanding. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology. London: Routledge.
Kelly, A. V. (2004). The curriculum: Theory and practice (5th ed). London: Sage.
Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. (1999). Introduction to factor analysis: What is it and how to do it? London: Sage.
Kimbell, R. (1995). Assessment of design and technology. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology. London: Routledge.
Lawton, D. (1993). Curriculum studies and educational planning. Kent: Hodder Stoughton Educational.
Lewin, R. (1995). Craft, Design and Technology and the Gifted Child. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology. London: Routledge.
McCormick, R. (1990). Technology and the national curriculum: the creation of a ‘subject’ by committee? Curriculum Journal, 1(1), 39–51.
McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 21–44.
McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. S., & Stein, S. J. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 81–101.
Mason, R., & Houghton, N. (2002). The Educational value of making. In S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes (Eds.), Issues in Design and Technology teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.
Medway, P. (1989). Issues in the theory and practice of technology education. Studies in Science Education, 16, 1–24.
Mittell, I., & Penny, A. (1997). Teacher perceptions of Design and Technology: A study of disjunction between policy and practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 279–293.
Naughton, J. (1995). What is technology? In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology. London: Routledge.
NICC (1991). Proposals for Technology and Design in the Northern Ireland curriculum: Report of the Ministerial Technology and Design Working Group. Belfast: Northern Ireland Curriculum Council.
Norman, E. (1998). The nature of technology for design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 67–87.
Owen-Jackson, G. (2000). Design and Technology in the school curriculum. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Learning to teach Design and Technology in the secondary school. London: Routledge Falmer.
Owen-Jackson, G. (2002a). Teaching Design and Technology in secondary schools—A reader. London: Routledge Falmer.
Owen-Jackson, G. (2002b). Teaching and learning about design. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary Design and Technology—perspectives on practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
Paechter, C. (1995). Subcultural retreat: Negotiating the Design and Technology curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 75–87.
QCA (2001). Addendum and guidance materials for key skills—2001. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Rennie, L. J., & Jarvis, T. (1995). English and Austrialian children’s perception about technology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13(1), 37–52.
Ropohl, G. (1997). Knowledge types in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 65–72.
Sayers, S. (2002). Is gender still on the agenda as an issue for design and technology? In S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes (Eds.), Issues in Design and Technology teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.
Shore, S. (2002). Links with Industry: to what extent is it possible to establish effective links to benefit all partners? In S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes (Eds.), Issues in Design and Technology teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.
Smithers, A., & Robinson, P. (1992). Technology in the national curriculum: Getting it right. London: The Engineering Council.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1999). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Yeomans, D. (1998). Vocationalising the Design and Technology curriculum: A case study from post-compulsory education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 281–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibson, K. Technology and Design, at Key Stage 3, within the Northern Ireland curriculum: teachers’ perceptions. Int J Technol Des Educ 19, 37–54 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9039-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9039-z