Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technology and Design, at Key Stage 3, within the Northern Ireland curriculum: teachers’ perceptions

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technology and Design was introduced at Key Stage 3 for all pupils in Northern Ireland, as a result of the Education Reform (NI) Order in 1989. Central to the process of introducing this new and compulsory subject, the government spent in excess of £167M to make provision for the subject in all post-primary schools. This paper explores the perceptions of teachers of Technology and Design (known as Design and Technology in GB) in post-primary schools throughout Northern Ireland to the introduction and implementation of the subject. The methods involved a questionnaire survey to all teachers of Technology and Design throughout Northern Ireland (n = 587) and one-to-one interviews with 24. Findings suggest that teachers consider Technology and Design to be a worthwhile subject and believe that it adds much to the educational experience of the pupils involved. Nonetheless, there is general acceptance that difficulties surround the whole issue of subject definition and content delineation. As a consequence, significant demands are placed upon these teachers as they work to ensure that all pupils are given a worthwhile and valuable learning experience. These findings are discussed in terms of teachers’ perceptions of subject definition, delineation of subject content, the nature of the work involved and issues related to academic ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1994). Statistics for psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ, London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (1999). “No one forgets a good teacher!”—What do ‘good’ technology teachers know? Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4(3), 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D. (1998). Design and Technology—the Nuffield perspective in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D. (2000). Preparing D&T for 2005—moving beyond the rhetoric: The DATA lecture. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. (1994). Designing the Future? Technology, values and choice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, C. (2003). Times change and we change with them, or do we? A new paradigm for Design and Technology. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 7(3), 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1985). In place of confusion: Technology and Science in the school curriculum. Nottingham: Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1995). Technological capability. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology. London: Routledge.

  • Bryman, A. B., & Burgess, R. G. (1994). Reflections on qualitative data analysis. In A. B. Bryman, & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.

  • Custer, R. L. (1995). Examining the dimensions of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENI. (1988). Education Reform in Northern Ireland :The way forward. Bangor, Northern Ireland: Department of Education for Northern Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENI. (2001a). The Education Reform Programme: Survey of Science and Technology and Design 1999–2000. Bangor, Northern Ireland: Department of Education for Northern Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENI. (2001b). Improving Technology and Design in post-primary schools 2001. Bangor, Northern Ireland: Department of Education for Northern Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.

  • Eggleston, J. (1993). The politics of technology education. Design and Technology Association Teaching, 3(2), 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, J. (1995). What is design and technology education? In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (1998). Jack-of-all-trades, master of none? An examination of subject skills provision on Technology (secondary) initial teacher education courses in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L. (1994). The relationship between Technology and Science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part I. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 123–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L. (1995). The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part II. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, I. S., Norton, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Davis, R. S. (2007). Can twenty years of technology education assist “grass roots” syllabus implementation? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. K., & Parsons-Heath, N. (1996). High school students’ views about technology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R., & Froelich, M. (1994). Defining technology and technological education: A crisis, or cause for celebration? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 179–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HMSO. (1992). Technology and design: Programmes of study and attainment target. Belfast: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1996). Perceptions about technology held by primary teachers in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1998). Factors that influence children’s developing perceptions about technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jephcote, M., & Hendley, D. (1995). How Design and Technology can contribute to the development of pupils’ economic and industrial understanding. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. V. (2004). The curriculum: Theory and practice (5th ed). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. (1999). Introduction to factor analysis: What is it and how to do it? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, R. (1995). Assessment of design and technology. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, D. (1993). Curriculum studies and educational planning. Kent: Hodder Stoughton Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R. (1995). Craft, Design and Technology and the Gifted Child. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (1990). Technology and the national curriculum: the creation of a ‘subject’ by committee? Curriculum Journal, 1(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. S., & Stein, S. J. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Houghton, N. (2002). The Educational value of making. In S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes (Eds.), Issues in Design and Technology teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medway, P. (1989). Issues in the theory and practice of technology education. Studies in Science Education, 16, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, I., & Penny, A. (1997). Teacher perceptions of Design and Technology: A study of disjunction between policy and practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (1995). What is technology? In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICC (1991). Proposals for Technology and Design in the Northern Ireland curriculum: Report of the Ministerial Technology and Design Working Group. Belfast: Northern Ireland Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E. (1998). The nature of technology for design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Jackson, G. (2000). Design and Technology in the school curriculum. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Learning to teach Design and Technology in the secondary school. London: Routledge Falmer.

  • Owen-Jackson, G. (2002a). Teaching Design and Technology in secondary schools—A reader. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Jackson, G. (2002b). Teaching and learning about design. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary Design and Technology—perspectives on practice. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paechter, C. (1995). Subcultural retreat: Negotiating the Design and Technology curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QCA (2001). Addendum and guidance materials for key skills—2001. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Jarvis, T. (1995). English and Austrialian children’s perception about technology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl, G. (1997). Knowledge types in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, S. (2002). Is gender still on the agenda as an issue for design and technology? In S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes (Eds.), Issues in Design and Technology teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, S. (2002). Links with Industry: to what extent is it possible to establish effective links to benefit all partners? In S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes (Eds.), Issues in Design and Technology teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, A., & Robinson, P. (1992). Technology in the national curriculum: Getting it right. London: The Engineering Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1999). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans, D. (1998). Vocationalising the Design and Technology curriculum: A case study from post-compulsory education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Gibson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, K. Technology and Design, at Key Stage 3, within the Northern Ireland curriculum: teachers’ perceptions. Int J Technol Des Educ 19, 37–54 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9039-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9039-z

Keywords

Navigation