Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of inter-organizational business process solutions: A conceptual model-based approach

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaboration and coordination between organizations are necessary in today’s business environment, and are enabled by inter-organizational processes. Many approaches for the construction of such processes have been proposed in recent years. However, due to the lack of standard terminology it is hard to evaluate and select a solution that fits a specific business scenario. The paper proposes a conceptual model which depicts the nature of interaction between organizations through business processes under specific business requirements that emphasize the privacy and autonomy of the participating organizations. The model is generic, and relies on the generic process model (GPM) framework and on Bunge’s ontology. Being generic and theory-based, we propose to use the model as a basis for comparing and evaluating design and implementation-level approaches for inter-organizational processes. We demonstrate the evaluation procedure by applying it to three existing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that synchronous actions in both organizations are possible according to the model. Even so, at the synchronization point the process might be waiting for an external event and will not proceed without it.

References

  • Aalst, W. M. P., & Basten, T. (2002). Inheritance of Workflows: An approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoretical Computer Science, 270(1–2), 125–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aalst, W. M. P., & Kumar, A. (2003). XML-Based Schema Definition for Support of Inter-organizational Workflow. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aalst, W. M. P., & Weske, M. (2001). The P2P approach to inter-organizational workflows. Proceedings of CAiSE’01 (LNCS 2068; pp. 140–156). Berlin: Springer.

  • Bunge, M. (ed.) (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy, Volume 3. Ontology 1: The furniture of the world. Boston: Reidel.

  • Bunge, M. (ed) (1979). Treatise on basic philosophy, Volume 4. Ontology II: A World of Systems, Reidel, Boston.

  • Business Process Management Initiative (2006), http://www.bpmi.org.

  • Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & Afsarmanesh, H. (Eds.) (1999). Infrastructures for virtual enterprises —Networking industrial enterprises. Kluwer.

  • Cassati, F., & Discenza, A. (2001). Modeling and managing interactions among business processes. Journal of Systems Integration, 10, 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, S. (2004). B2B integration over the Internet with XML: RosettaNet successes and challenges. Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference (pp. 188–195).

  • ebXML BPSS (Electronic Business using eXtensible Markup Language) (2006), ebXML BPSS specification, website:http://www.ebXML.org/.

  • Ghattas, J., & Soffer, P. (2008). Facilitating Flexibility in Inter-Organizational Processes: A Conceptual Model. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management (in press)

  • Green, P., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Ontological analysis of business systems analysis techniques: experiences and proposals for an enhanced methodology. In P. Green, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies (pp. 1–27). Hershey: IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. F., Rosemann, M., & Indulska, M. (2005). Ontological evaluation of enterprise systems interoperability using ebXML. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(5), 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grefen, P., Abere, K., Hoffner, Y., & Ludwig, H. (2000). CrossFlow: Cross-organizational workflow management in dynamic virtual enterprises. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 15(5), 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guelfi, N., le Cousin, G., & Ries, B. (2004). Engineering of dependable complex business processes using UML and coordinated atomic actions. Proceedings of OTM workshops (LNCS 3292; pp. 468–482), Berlin: Springer.

  • Kabilan, V. (2005). Contract workflow model patterns using BPMN, EMMSAD’05, Proceedings of CAiSE’05 workshops Vol. 1, Porto, Portugal (pp. 557–568).

  • Kabilan, V., & Johannesson, P. (2003). Semantic representation of contract knowledge using multi tier ontology. Proceedings of Semantic Web and Databases Workshop (SWDB 2003).

  • Kabilan, V., Johannesson, P., & Rugaimukammu, D. (2003). Business contract obligation monitoring through use of multi-tier contract ontology. Proceedings of Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies (Worm Core 2003), Italy (LNCS 2889). Berlin: Springer.

  • Kafeza, E., Chiu, D. K.W., & Kafeza, I. (2001). View-Based Contracts in an E-Service Cross-Organizational Workflow Environment. Proceedings of TES 2001 (LNCS 2193; pp. 74–88). Berlin: Springer.

  • OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) (2006), http://www.oasis-open.org.

  • OMG (Object Management group) (2006), Business process modeling notation (BPMN), http://www.bpmn.org/

  • Rosettanet Organization & Standards, website: http://www.Rosettanet.org/, 2007.

  • Soffer, P. (2005). On the notion of flexibility in business processes. Proceedings of the CAiSE’05 Workshops, pp. 35 – 42.

  • Soffer, P., & Ghattas, J. (2006). Business process flexibility in virtual organizations. Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Design and Support (BPMDS’06), Proceedings of CAiSE’06 Workshops, p. 188–197

  • Soffer, P., & Wand, Y. (2004). Goal-driven analysis of process model validity. Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’04) (LNCS 3084; pp. 521–535).

  • Soffer, P., & Wand, Y. (2005). On the notion of soft goals in business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 11(6), 663–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (1990). An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(11), 1282–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (1993). On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Journal of Information Systems, 3, 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, H., & Van den Heuvel, W. J. (2002). Cross-organizational workflow integration using contracts. Decision Support Systems, 33(3), 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WFMC (Workflow Management Coalition) (2006). Workflow management coalition interface: Process definition interchange process model. http://www.wfmc.org.

  • W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) (2006). http://www.w3.org.

  • Zdravkovic, J., & Kabilan, V. (2005). Enabling business process interoperability using contract workflow models. OTM 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: OTM Con. International Conferences, Cyprus (LNCS 3760; pp. 77–93). Berlin: Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johny Ghattas.

Appendix: Models detailed mapping

Appendix: Models detailed mapping

Table 6 Detailed mapping of P2P
Table 7 Detailed mapping of CWM
Table 8 Detailed mapping of RosettaNet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghattas, J., Soffer, P. Evaluation of inter-organizational business process solutions: A conceptual model-based approach. Inf Syst Front 11, 273–291 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9090-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9090-7

Keywords

Navigation