Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate preoperatively dry eye disease (DED) in patients with pathological Tear Break Up Time (TBUT), utilising subjective Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) with its subcategories and objective Keratograph 5M characteristics.
Methods
Fifty-four cataract patients were included in this prospective study having a screening slit lamp TBUT of less than 10 s and more or equal to 5 s. Subjective evaluation of DED was performed with OSDI questionnaire and objective evaluation with Keratograph 5M. Tear Meniscus Height (TMH), bulbar and limbal redness and meibography grade were evaluated. Further analysis of OSDI subcategories, Visual Function Related (VFR), Ocular Symptoms related (OS) and Environmental Triggered (ET), was performed with linear and logistic multivariate regression models. Age, gender and logMAR visual acuity (VA) were also included in our models.
Results
Following the initial TBUT screening we identified 27(50%) normal and 27(50%) dry eye patients, using OSDI questionnaire. There was no statistical difference in TMH (p = 0.64), bulbar redness (p = 0.54), limbal redness (p = 0.72) and meibography grade (p = 0.25), between normal and dry eye OSDI group. In our regression analysis, average logMAR VA was highly associated with a higher total OSDI score (p < 0.001) and with a higher OSDI-VFR score (p < 0.001). Female gender was associated with a higher OSDI-ET score (p = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression models were performed by sorting patients into 2 categories of normal and dry eye group according to their total OSDI,OSDI-VRF,OSDI-OS and OSDI-ET score. An increase in logMAR VA increased the odds of having abnormal total OSDI score (p = 0.007) and OSDI-VFR score (p = 0.006). Females had increased odds of having abnormal OSDI-ET score (p = 0.044).
Conclusions
Clinicians should be aware of OSDI limitations when screening cataract patients for dry eyes, as there is high correlation with VA. Female patients were more susceptible to environmental factors. Keratograph results should be interpreted with caution when they are evaluated in conjunction with OSDI during preoperative assessment of DED in cataract patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data are available by the corresponding author (E.C) upon request.
References
Wang W, Yan W, Fotis K et al (2016) Cataract surgical rate and socioeconomics: a global study. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(14):5872–5881
Cataract surgical rates (2017) Community Eye Health 30(100):88–89
Epitropoulos AT, Matossian C, Berdy GJ et al (2015) Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(8):1672–1677
Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE (2016) Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ 10:1965–1970
Salerno LC, Tiveron MCJ, Alió JL (2017) Multifocal intraocular lenses: types, outcomes, complications and how to solve them. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 7(4):179–184
Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK et al (2017) TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf 15(3):276–283
Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G et al (2000) Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 118(5):615–621
Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY et al (2017) TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf 15(3):334–365
Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R et al (2017) TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf 15(3):539–574
Zhu K, Xie W, Ying J, Yao Y (2016) Evaluation of tear film and meibomian gland function in dry eye patients using Keratograph 5M. Zhejiang Da Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 45(4):422–428
Pérez Bartolomé F, Martínez de la Casa JM, Villalobos PA et al (2018) Ocular redness measured with the Keratograph 5M in patients using anti-glaucoma eye drops. Semin Ophthalmol 33(5):643–650
Mathews PM, Ramulu PY, Friedman DS et al (2013) Evaluation of ocular surface disease in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 120(11):2241–2248
Walt J (2004) Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) administration and scoring manual. Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA
Walt JG, Rowe MM, Stern KL (1997) Evaluating the functional impact of dry eye: the ocular surface disease index. Drug Inf J 31(1436):b5
Gupta PK, Drinkwater OJ, VanDusen KW et al (2018) Prevalence of ocular surface dysfunction in patients presenting for cataract surgery evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 44(9):1090–1096
Best N, Drury L, Wolffsohn JS (2012) Clinical evaluation of the oculus Keratograph. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 35(4):171–174
Cho YK, Kim MS (2009) Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors. Korean J Ophthalmol KJO 23(2):65–73
Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SC, Sanabria O et al (1998) Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea 17(1):38–56
Malet F, Le Goff M, Colin J et al (2014) Dry eye disease in French elderly subjects: the Alienor study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenhagen) 92(6):e429-436
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Kheirkhan A et al (2014) Prevalence of dry eye syndrome in an adult population. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 42(3):242–248
Sajnani R, Raia S, Gibbons A et al (2018) Epidemiology of persistent postsurgical pain manifesting as dry eye-like symptoms after cataract surgery. Cornea 37(12):1535–1541
Ozdemir M, Temizdemir H (2010) Age- and gender-related tear function changes in normal population. Eye (London) 24(1):79–83
Miller KL, Walt JG, Mink DR et al (2010) Minimal clinically important difference for the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 128(1):94–101
Pflugfelder SC, Baudouin C (2011) Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. Clin Ophthalmol 5:1575–1583
Dougherty BE, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK (2011) Rasch analysis of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(12):8630–8635
Choi YJ, Park SY, Jun I et al (2018) Perioperative ocular parameters associated with persistent dry eye symptoms after cataract surgery. Cornea 37(6):734–739
Galor A, Felix ER, Feuer W et al (2015) Dry eye symptoms align more closely to non-ocular conditions than to tear film parameters. Br J Ophthalmol 99(8):1126–1129
Finis D, Ackermann P, Pischel N et al (2015) Evaluation of meibomian gland dysfunction and local distribution of meibomian gland atrophy by non-contact infrared meibography. Curr Eye Res 40(10):982–989
Seo MH, Shin JY, Lee DH, Kim JH et al (2017) Objective parameters associated with subjective symptom severity in dry eye syndrome patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 58(3):259–267
Funding
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethics Committee of the Hospital involved.
Animal research
The article does not contain any studies with animals.
Consent to publish
All authors have signed a consent form for the publication of the article.
Informed consent
Informed consent for the treatment protocol and the data collection was obtained from the patient.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fydanaki, O., Chalkiadaki, E., Tsiogka, A. et al. Preoperative dry eyes disease in cataract patients with deficient tear break up time: evaluation of OSDI questionnaire, its subcategories and Keratograph 5M device results. Int Ophthalmol 42, 3017–3025 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02287-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02287-5