Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Origins and Development of a Symbolic Mind: The Case of Pictorial Symbols

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two themes emerge from studies of the development of symbolic understanding; that development proceeds through multiple levels of understanding prior to full and reflective knowledge of the representational function of pictorial symbols, and that development is founded upon individual cognitive and social cognitive proclivities as well as on supports from others in the social group. The classical theoretical antecedents to this contemporary perspective on the development of pictorial symbol understanding are briefly reviewed here and followed by evidence from contemporary research that provides support for these claims in the domain of pictorial symbol understanding and its development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avis, J., & Harris, P. (1991). Belief-desire reasoning among Baka children: Evidence for a universal conception of mind. Child Development,62, 460–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children’s naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science,9, 200–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, C. A., & Woolley, J. D. (2001). Theory of mind in children’s naming of drawings. Journal of Cognition and Development,2, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T. (2013). Symbols and symbolic thought. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), The oxford handbook of developmental psychology: Vol. 1, body and mind (pp. 974–1005). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T., Coutts, E., Dewhirst, P. & Zeitner, B. (2013). Developing pictorial symbol understanding in 18- to 36-month-olds. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Callaghan, T., Moll, H., Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., Liszkowski, U., Behne, T., et al. (2011a). Early social cognition in three cultural contexts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,76(2), 299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., & Corbit, J. (2011b). Young children’s knowledge of the representational function of pictorial symbols: Development across the preschool years in three cultures. Journal of Cognition and Development,13, 320–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T. C. (1999). Early understanding and production of graphic symbols. Child Development,7, 1314–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T. C. (2000). Factors affecting children’s graphic symbol use in the third year: Language, similarity and iconicity. Cognitive Development,15, 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T. C. (2008). The origins and development of pictorial symbolic functioning. In C. Milbrath & H. Trautner (Eds.), Children’s understanding and production of pictures, drawings, and art (pp. 21–32). Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T., & Corbit, J. (2015). The development of symbolic representation. In L. Liben & U. Mueller (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 2, 7th Ed., pp. 250–294). New York, NY: Wiley.

  • Callaghan, T. C., & Rankin, M. (2002). Evidence of graphic symbol functioning and the question of domain specificity: A longitudinal training study. Child Development,73, 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T. C., & Rochat, P. (2008). Children’s understanding of artist-picture relations: Implications for their theories of pictures. In C. Milbrath & H. Trantner (Eds.), Children’s understanding and production of pictures, drawings and art (pp. 187–205). Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T. C., Rochat, P., MacGillivray, T., & MacLellan, C. (2004). The social construction of pictorial symbols in 6- to 18-month-old infants. Child Development,75, 1733–1744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. M., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008). Symbolic thought. In M. M. Haith & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development (3rd ed., pp. 288–297). London: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DeLoache, J. S., Pierroutsakos, S. L., & Troseth, G. L. (1996). The three R’s of pictorial competence. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development: Vol. 12 (pp. 1–48). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLoache, J. S., Pierroutsakos, S. L., Uttal, D. H., Rosengren, K. S., & Gottleib, A. (1998). Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychological Science,9, 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganea, P. A., Allen, M., Butler, L., Carey, S., & DeLoache, J. S. (2009). Toddlers’ referential understanding of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology,104, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganea, P. A., Ma, L., & DeLoache, J. S. (2011). Young children’s learning and transfer of biological information from picture books to real animals. Child Development,82, 1421–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganea, P. A., Pickard, M. B., & DeLoache, J. S. (2008). Transfer between picture books and the real world by very young children. Journal of Cognition and Development,9, 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., & Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and representational status in children’s early naming. Cognition,66, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development,59, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S. (2002). Spatial development in children: Where are we now? In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 326–348). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S. (2005). Appreciating the meaning and aesthetics of spatial-graphic representations during childhood. In L. Balter & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child Psychology: A Handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 263–292). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Downs, R. M. (1993). Understanding person-space-map relations: Cartographic and developmental perspectives. Developmental Psychology,29, 739–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, J., & Perner, J. (2012). Implicit and explicit theory of mind: State of the art. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,30, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2010). Toward a mentalistic account of early psychological reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science,19, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martlew, M. M., & Connolly, K. J. (1996). Human figure drawings by schooled and unschooled children in Papua New Guinea. Child Development,67, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (2006). Development of representation in childhood. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 178–192). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning and memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J. (1999). Theory of mind. In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 205–230). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., & Roessler, J. (2012). From infants’ to children’s appreciation of belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,16, 519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preissler, M. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Two-year-olds use artistic intention to understand drawings. Cognition,106, 512–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preissler, M. A., & Carey, S. (2004). Do both pictures and words function as symbols for 18-and 24-month-old children? Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 185–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, H. (2012). Do infants have a theory of mind? British Journal of Developmental Psychology,30, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P., & Callaghan, T. C. (2005). What drives symbolic development? The case of pictorial comprehension and production. In L. Namy (Ed.), Symbol use and symbolic representation: Developmental and comparative perspectives (pp. 27–49). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salsa, A. N., & Peralta deMendoza, O. (2007). Routes to symbolization: Intentionality and correspondence in early understanding of pictures. Journal of Cognition and Development,8, 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simcock, G., & DeLoache, J. (2006). Get the picture? The effects of iconicity on toddlers’ reenactment from picture books. Developmental Psychology,42, 1352–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodian, B. (2011). Theory of mind in infancy. Child Development Perspectives,5, 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szechter, L. E., & Liben, L. S. (2004). Parental guidance in preschooler’s understanding of spatial-graphic representations. Child Development,75, 869–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tare, M., Chiong, C., Ganea, P. A., & DeLoache, J. S. (2010). Less is More: The effect of manipulative features on children's learning from picture books. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,31, 395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C., Walker, L., & Ganea, P. A. (2012). The role of symbol-based experience in early learning and transfer from pictures: Evidence from Tanzania. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., & Lourenco, S. F. (2003). Imitation and the dialectic of representation. Developmental Review,23, 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada

    Tara Callaghan

Authors
  1. Tara Callaghan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara Callaghan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Callaghan, T. The Origins and Development of a Symbolic Mind: The Case of Pictorial Symbols. Interchange 51, 53–64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-020-09396-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-020-09396-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation