Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Primate–Predator Interactions: Is There a Mismatch Between Laboratory and Ecological Evidence?

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abundant empirical and theoretical studies indicate that predation is a key driver of primate evolution. The Snake Detection Theory (SDT) posits that snakes have been the main predators of primates since the late Cretaceous and that they influenced the diversification and evolution of primates. Laboratory research focusing on the innate ability of primates to detect snakes amid complex visual stimuli has provided strong support for key tenets of the SDT. While this theory has greatly contributed to our knowledge of primate evolution, supporting experimental studies may have overly focused on snakes and disregarded other important predators. This potential sampling bias weakens the conclusion that primates respond with a specific (high) intensity to snakes compared to other predators. We reviewed the literature about primate-predator interactions under natural and experimental conditions. We listed the primate and predator species involved in natural versus experimental studies. Predation events on primates recorded in the field mainly involved other primates, then raptors and carnivorans. SDT-related experimental studies heavily focused on snakes as predator stimuli and did not include raptors. Other experimental studies largely used snakes and primates and to a lesser extent carnivorans. Apes were the most often tested primates in experimental studies, whereas other primate taxa were neglected. Moreover, predators used as stimuli in experimental studies were inaccurately identified, notably snakes. Altogether, our results show that SDT-related studies neglected most of the major natural predators of primates. SDT studies also focused on a handful of primate species, whereas the theory relies on comparisons among taxa. Finally, poor taxonomic information on snakes used as stimuli blurs the interpretation of their relationship with primates. We suggest that future studies test the SDT by presenting a wide range of predators to different primate species to improve our understanding of the complexity of predator–prey interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Benoit Van Der Zyppe for help setting up the bibliographic analysis grid, reading publications, and data collection. We are grateful to Sandrine Prat for her insightful comments and suggestions on the manuscript. We thank the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN) for allocating a Master’s grant to Karl Zeller. We thank anonymous reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments that helped improving the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Museum national d’Histoire naturelle (France) to C.G and K.Z.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Original idea: XB. Conceptualization and writing of first version of the manuscript: KZ. Data collection, data management and statistical analyses: KZ. All authors contributed to the elaboration of the research questions and to the methodology. All authors contributed to writing, improvements and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Zeller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Joanna M. Setchell

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeller, K., Garcia, C., Maille, A. et al. Primate–Predator Interactions: Is There a Mismatch Between Laboratory and Ecological Evidence?. Int J Primatol 44, 258–281 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00331-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00331-w

Keywords