Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Digital Divides on Student Mathematics Achievement in Confucian Heritage Cultures: a Critical Examination Using PISA 2012 Data

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study critically examines if digital divides, comprising access to and use of information technology (IT) in two spheres (schools and at home), affect student achievement in Confucian heritage cultures (CHCs). The sample comprised 38,158 students from 1030 schools in seven CHCs who participated in Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012. Markov chain Monte Carlo multiple imputation, hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), and latent class analysis (LCA) were employed in the analysis. Results showed that home (but not school) IT use benefited student mathematics achievement, and students with the overall least IT resources were most academically successful. These results indicate the importance of understanding the nuanced effects of digital divides in different contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, D. E., Goesling, B., & Letendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman-Loxley Effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K. J. (Eds.) (2006). Domestication of media and technology. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, J. (2014). A review of missing data handling methods in education research. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 487–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2005). Effects of resources, inequality, and privilege bias on achievement: Country, school, and student level analyses. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 575–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick, R., Ferron, J., Hess, M., Hogarty, K., Kromrey, J., Lang, T., . . . Lee, R. S. (2009). Multilevel modelling: A review of methodological issues and applications. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 69–102.

  • Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011). The relationship between students’ exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir, I., Unal, H., & Kilic, S. (2010). The effect of quality of educational resources on mathematics achievement: Turkish case from PISA 2006. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science s, 2(2), 1855–1859.

  • Du, J., Havard, B., Yu, C., & Adams, J. (2004). The impact of technology use on low-income and minority students’ academic achievement: Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 4(2), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. J., French, A., & Li, W.-X. (2015). The relationship among cultural dimensions, education expenditure, and PISA performance. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacquinta, J. B., Bauer, J. A., & Levin, J. E. (1993). Beyond technology’s promise: An examination of children’s educational computing at home. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Flores, J., Rodriguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J.-J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güzeller, C. O., & Akın, A. (2014). Relationship between ICT variables and mathematics achievement based on PISA 2006 database: International evidence. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., & Makino, A. (2013). Learning cities in East Asia: Japan, the Republic of Korea and China. International Review of Education, 59, 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to Achievement. Oxon, & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K‐12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

  • Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ker, H. W. (2016). The impacts of student-, teacher- and school-level factors on mathematics achievement: An exploratory comparative investigation of Singaporean students and the USA students. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Chang, M. (2010). Does computer use promote the mathematical proficiency of ELL students? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(3), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A. (2009). E-learning: You don’t always get what you hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 27(1), 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korupp, S. E., & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and trends of the digital divide. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. (2010). Views on education and achievement: Finland’s story of success and South Korea’s story of decline. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 7(2), 379–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, S., McNally, S., & Silva, O. (2007). New technology in schools: Is there a payoff? Economic Journal, 117(522), 1145–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MORI (1999). The British and technology. Basingstoke, England: Motorola.

  • Muthen, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modelling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Statistics. (2001). Internet access: First quarter 2001. London, England: National Statistics.

  • National Statistics. (2002). Internet access: First quarter 2002. London, England: National Statistics.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA. Paris, France: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013a). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved 11 September 2017 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013b). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Retrieved 2 July 2018 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA%202012%20framework%20e-book_final.pdf

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Retrieved 11 September 2017 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2012-technical-report-final.pdf

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Retrieved 11 September 2017 from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/students-computers-and-learning_9789264239555-en#page3

  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36, 1135–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou, E. C., & Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Computer use and mathematical literacy: An analysis of existing and potential relationships. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & du Tolt, M. (2011). HLM7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Surveys of Great Britain (RSGB). (2001). ICT access and use: Report on the benchmark survey—DfEE research report 252. London, England: Department for Education and Employment.

  • Richter, T. (2006). What is wrong with ANOVA and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse Processes, 41(3), 221–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (2009). Securing quality and equity in education: Lessons from PISA. Prospects, 39, 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (1999). Differences in educational computer use: The influences of subject cultures. The Curriculum Journal, 10(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (Eds.) (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London, England: Routledge.

  • Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces (pp. 15–31). London, England: Routledge.

  • Sterne, J. A. C., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., . . . Carpenter, J. R. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338, b2393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2393.

  • Tan, C. (2015). Teacher-directed and learner-engaged: Exploring a Confucian conception of education. Ethics and Education, 10(3), 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2016). Constructivism and pedagogical reform in China: Issues and challenges. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2015.1105737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. T. (2013). Is the learning approach of students from the Confucian heritage culture problematic? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divided as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Information Society, 19, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.

  • Visser, M., Juan, A., & Feza, N. (2015). Home and school resources as predictors of mathematics performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waithaka, E. N. (2014). Family capital: Conceptual model to unpack the intergenerational transfer of advantage in transitions to adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(3), 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werblow, J., & Duesbery, L. (2009). The impact of high school size on math achievement and dropout rate. The High School Journal, 92(3), 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers & Education, 50, 1558–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, A. H. K., Lau, W. W. F., Park, J. H., Lau, G. K. K., & Chan, A. K. M. (2016). Digital equity and students’ home computing: A Hong Kong study. Asia-Pacific Educational Research, 25(4), 509–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., & Blume, G. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: The perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 1169–1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

  • Zhang, L., Khan, G., & Tahirsylaj, A. (2015). Student performance, school differentiation, and world cultures: Evidence from PISA 2009. International Journal of Educational Development, 42, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Cheng Yong Tan & Khe Foon Hew

    Present address: Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

Authors and Affiliations

    Authors
    1. Cheng Yong Tan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Khe Foon Hew
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Cheng Yong Tan.

    Electronic Supplementary Material

    ESM 1

    (DOCX 16 kb)

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Tan, C.Y., Hew, K.F. The Impact of Digital Divides on Student Mathematics Achievement in Confucian Heritage Cultures: a Critical Examination Using PISA 2012 Data. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 17, 1213–1232 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9917-8

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9917-8

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation