Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kuwaiti Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Intentions Regarding the Use of Inquiry-Based Instruction

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the quality of education, the Kuwaiti Ministry of Education has encouraged schools to implement inquiry-based instruction. This study identifies psychosocial factors that predict teachers’ intention to use inquiry-based instruction in their science classrooms. An adapted model of Ajzen’s (1985) theory of planned behaviour—the Science Adoption Model—was used to study Kuwaiti science teachers’ beliefs. Four hundred and ninety-six teachers from all the government primary schools in Kuwait completed a questionnaire. The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to statistically examine the relationships among the constructs of the model. It was found that teachers’ attitudes towards using inquiry-based instruction significantly predicted their capacity to create and deliver inquiry-based lessons. Although Kuwaiti science teachers held positive beliefs about the implementation of inquiry-based instruction, many factors limited their use of this approach in their science classroom. One clear implication from this study is that educators need to overtly consider teachers’ beliefs as inquiry-based instruction reform is implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned action. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behaviour (pp. 11–39). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 197–211.

  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behaviour: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alajmi, A. & Reys, R. (2007). Reasonable and reasonableness of answers: Kuwaiti middle school teachers’ perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhendal, D. (2013). An examination of factors influencing Kuwaiti science teachers’ use of inquiry-based instruction (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.

  • Al-Sahel, R. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of underachievement in elementary schools in Kuwait. School Psychology International, 26, 478–493.

  • Armitage, C. & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballone, L. & Czerniak, C. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about accommodating students’ learning styles in science classes. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/issue/archive.

  • Bundy, C. (2004). Changing behaviour: using motivational interviewing techniques. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97(suppl. 44), 43–47.

  • Choi, S. & Ramsey, J. (2009). Constructing elementary teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and practical knowledge through an inquiry-based elementary science course. School Science and Mathematics, 109(6), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M. & Armitage, C. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behaviour: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4).

  • Crawley, F. & Salyer, B. (1995). Origins of life science teachers’ beliefs underlying curriculum reform in Texas. Science Education, 79(6), 611–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak, C. & Lumpe, A. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak, C., Lumpe, A. & Haney, J. (1999). Science teachers’ beliefs and intention to implement thematic units. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desouza, J. & Czerniak, C. (2003). Study of science teachers’ attitude toward and beliefs about collaborative reflective practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(2), 75–96.

  • Ebrahim, A. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning strategies on elementary students’ science achievement and social skills in Kuwait. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Kasheir, D., Ashour, A. & Yacout, M. (2009). Factors affecting continued usage of internet banking among Egyptian customers. Communications of the IBIMA, 9(29), 252–263.

  • Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J., Czerniak, C. & Lumpe, A. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 967–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. J. & Salinas, I. (2009). Authentic science learning in primary and secondary classrooms. In M. I. Saleh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Fostering scientific habits of mind: Pedagogical knowledge and best practices in science education (pp. 125–144). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

  • Hobbis, I. & Sutton, S. (2005). Are techniques used in cognitive behaviour therapy applicable to behaviour change interventions based on the theory of planned behaviour? Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, W. (2000). Quantitative research design. Sportscience, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.sportsci.org/jour/0001/wghdesign.html.

  • Johnson, C. (2007). Technical, political and cultural barriers to science education reform. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 10(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C. & Bryan, L. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilic, D., Emsen, P. & Soran, H. (2011). Behavioural intention towards laboratory applications in science teaching. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 28, 416–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Hayes, D., Mills, M. & Chrisite, P. (2003). Leading learning: Making hope practical in schools. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A. & Chambers, E. (2001). Assessing teacher’s context beliefs about technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A., Haney, J. & Czerniak, C. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the use of cooperative learning. School Science and Mathematics, 98(3), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, S. & Freeman, M. (2006). Teacher stress and high stakes testing: How using one measure of academic success leads to multiple teacher stressors. In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability (pp. 43–63). Greenwich, England: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2003). General education strategy in the State of Kuwait 2005–2025. Kuwait: Author.

  • Minner, D., Levy, A. & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual (4th ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University.

  • Panasan, M. & Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). Learning outcomes of project-based and inquiry-based learning activities. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 252–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, R. R. (2001). Using the theory of planned behaviour as a framework for the evaluation of a professional development workshop. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 2(1), 34–41.

  • Rise, J. & Ommundsen, R. (2011). Predicting the intention to quit smoking: A comparative study among Spanish and Norwegian students. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7(1), 143–163.

  • Rosenfelda, M. & Rosenfelda, S. (2008). Developing effective teacher beliefs about learners: The role of sensitizing teachers to individual learning differences. Educational Psychology, 28(3), 245–272.

  • Sallimah, S. (2006). The status quo of Bruneian and Japanese secondary school teachers implementation of information and communication technology in teaching: A comparative study. Brunei Darussalam: Authority for Info-Communications Technology Industry of Brunei Darussalam, AiTi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silcox, S. & MacNeill, N. (2006). Catalytic teachers’ roles in pedagogic change. An Electronic Journal for Leaders in Education, 4(36). Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/back_issues,66.html.

  • Taylor, S. & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D. & Gallard, A. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science: A contemporary perspective. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G. & Xu, J. (2007). Adoption of educational technology: How does gender matter? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 140–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zint, M. (2002). Comparing three attitude-behaviour theories for predicting science teachers’ intentions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 819–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalal Alhendal.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alhendal, D., Marshman, M. & Grootenboer, P. Kuwaiti Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Intentions Regarding the Use of Inquiry-Based Instruction. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 1455–1473 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9671-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9671-0

Keywords

Navigation