Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

RESEARCHING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SCIENCE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMME USING A PROPOSED CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS: A CASE STUDY

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on an action research-based professional learning programme (PLP) in which early career teachers volunteered to identify and then research an aspect of their science teaching practice. The PLP was facilitated by academics from the School of Education and the Barbara Hardy Institute at the University of South Australia. The teachers, who worked in low socio-economic areas of Adelaide’s northern suburbs, participated in the programme in order to enhance their pedagogical content knowledge about science. They also shared an interest in connecting their students to the natural world through citizen science. The PLP utilised collaborative practices and engagement within a socio-constructivist pedagogical framework. As a result of their participation, the teachers reported increased confidence to plan and teach units of work that moved away from textbook-orientated approaches to science. Teachers were interviewed at key points during the PLP, and transcripts were analysed against Tytler’s (Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press, 2007) proposed curriculum framework for science. This case study identified teacher learning, and the strengths and limitations of the PLP, thus enabling the facilitators to reflect on the programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Academy of Science (2010) Primary Connections, Canberra, A.C.T. Australian Capital Territory:Author

  • Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2013) Retrieved 8 August 2013 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/

  • Berkowitz, A. R. (1997). A simple framework for considering the benefits of SSPs. In K. C. Cohen (Ed.), National Conference on Student and Scientist Partnerships (pp. 38–41). Cambridge, MA: TERC and Concord Consortium.

  • Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. & Wilderman, C.C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).

  • Bowers, C. A. (2001). Education for eco-justice and community. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A. (2006). Revitalizing the commons: Culture and educational sites of resistance and affirmation. Oxford, UK: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practical action. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R.W. (2006). Enhancing science teaching and student learning: A BSCS perspective. Retrieved 28 September 2006 from http://www.acer.edu.au/workshops/conferences.html

  • Clark, I. & Zeegers, Y. P. (2012). Education for sustainable development: Improving curriculum design in higher education. In C. Daniels & P. Roetman (Eds.), Creating sustainable communities in a changing world (pp. 225–232). Adelaide: Crawford House Publishing, Adelaide, Australia

  • Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. G. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51–69). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (1994). World view, culture, and science education. Science Education International, 5(4), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coertjens, L., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Maeyer, D. & Petegem, V. (2010). Do schools make a difference in their students’ environmental attitudes and awareness? Evidence from Pisa 2006 International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 497–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, L. & Jenkins, K. (2012). Encouraging teacher development through embedding reflective practice in assessment. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Children’s Services (2010). South Australian teaching for effective learning (TEFL): South Australian Teaching for Effective Learning Framework Guide: A resource for developing quality teaching and learning in South Australia. Retrieved 28 August 2013 from http://www.learningtolearn.sa.edu.au/tfel/files/links/SA_TfEL_Framework_horizont.pdf

  • Dickinson, J. & Bonney, R. (Eds.). (2012). Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research. London: Comstock, London, United Kingdom.

  • Faire, J. & Cosgrove, M. (1993). Teaching primary science. Hamilton, New Zealand: Waikato Education Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (2003). What do the “All” need in science education? In D. Fisher & T. Marsh (Eds.), Third Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (pp. 1–20). Rhodes University, South Africa: Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology.

  • Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P. & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science Education, 77(6), 685–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Yoon, H., Ji, Y. & Song, J. (2012). The dynamics of learning science in everyday contexts: A case study of everyday science class in Korea. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinna, D. & Paige, K. (2010). Connecting year 9 mathematics to the community: An action research project. In B. Prosser, B. Lucas & A. Reid (Eds.), Connecting lives and learning: Renewing pedagogy in the Middle Years (pp. 60–72). Adelaide: Wakefield Press, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Mamlok-Naaman, R. & Eilks, I. (2012). Different types of action research to promote chemistry teachers’ professional development—A joined theoretical reflection on two cases from. Israel and Germany International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 581–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. (1992). History, philosophy and science teaching: The present rapprochement. Science & Education, 1(1), 11–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. (Ed.). (2009). Science, worldviews and education. Springer. Science & Business Media. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5

  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D. & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes to classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D. & Kull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students’ perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., Cawthorne, G., Dey, C. & Angrew, C. (Eds.). (2012). Enough for all forever: A handbook for learning about sustainability. Champagne, Illinois: Common Ground, Illinois, IL.

  • Osborne, J. (2006). Towards a science education for all: The role of ideas, evidence and argument. Paper presented at the ACER Research Conference: Boosting Science Learning- What will it take? Canberra, Australia. http://www.acer.edu.au/workshops/conferences.html

  • Paige, K., Lawes, H., Matejcic, P., Taylor, C., Stewart, V., Lloyd, D. & Daniels, C. et al. (2010). ‘It felt like real science!’: How Operation Magpie enriched my classroom. Teaching Science, 56(4), 25–33.

  • Paige, K. & Lloyd, D. (2011). Educating for sustainability: A vehicle for engaging primary/middle education students in science. In P. E. J. Roetman & C. B. Daniels (Eds.), Creating sustainable communities in a changing world (pp. 239–247). Adelaide: Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Paige, K. & Lloyd, D. (2012). Pedagogical practices and science learning with a focus on sustainability for pre-service primary and middle years educators: Directions and challenges. In M. Daniel & S. W. Hwang (Eds.), Moving forward: Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 191–208). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K., Lloyd, D., Zeegers, Y., Roetman, P., Daniels, C., Hoekman, B., Linnell, L., George, L. & Szilassy, D. (2012). Connecting teachers and students to the natural world through Operation Spider: An Aspirations Citizen Science Project. Teaching Science, 58(1), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (1997). Septic tank crisis: A case study of science, technology and society in an elementary school. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1211–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, B., Reid, A. & Lucas, B. (Eds.). (2010). Connecting lives and learning: Renewing pedagogy in the middle years. Adelaide: Wakefield Press, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Rennie, L. (2006). The community’s contribution to science learning: Making it count. Retrieved 23 September 2006 from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=research_conference_2006

  • Riddle, E. M. (1999). Lev Vygotsky’s social development theory. Retrieved 3 March 2007 from http://tonymcarthur.edublogs.org/files/2007/03/vygotsky1.htm

  • Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge, United Kingdom.

  • Roetman, P. E. J. (2013). The ‘citizen’ in citizen science: The research, education and engagement of a program based on local wildlife species in South Australia. University of South Australia, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Adelaide.

  • Roetman, P. E. J. & Daniels, C. B. (2011). The benefits of citizen science in research, education and community engagement. In P. E. J. Roetman & C. B. Daniels (Eds.), Creating sustainable communities in a changing world (pp. 249–260). Adelaide: Crawford House Publishing, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Rogers, M., Abell, S., Lannin, J., Wang, C., Musikul, K., Barker, D. & Dingman, S. (2007). Effective Professional Development in Science and Mathematics Education: Teachers’ and Facilitators’ Views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 507–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & Désautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang, New York, NY.

  • Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press, New York, NY.

  • Tinker, R. F. (1997). Student scientist partnerships: Shrewd maneuvers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, N. M., Shirk, J. L., Fee, J. & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Who poses the questions? Using citizen science to help K-12 teachers meet the mandate for inquiry. In J. L. Dickinson & R. Bonney (Eds.), Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research (pp. 179–190). Ithaca, NY: Comstock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D. & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multimodal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. & Lloyd, D. (2010). Connecting lives and learning: Super size me with science. In B. Prosser, A. Reid & B. Lucas (Eds.), Connecting lives and learning: Action research in the Middle Years of schooling (pp. 73–93). Adelaide: Wakefield Press, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Zeegers, Y. & McKinnon, H. (2012). ‘Does a spider have fur’? Blending primary science and English language learning for ESL students. Teaching Science, 58(3), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeegers, Y., Paige, K., Lloyd, D. & Roetman, P. (2012). Operation Magpie: Inspiring primary school teachers through science-focused professional learning experiences. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 28, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoellick, B., Nelson, S. J. & Schauffler, M. (2012). Participatory science and education: Bringing both views into focus. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 310–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia

    Kathryn Paige, Yvonne Zeegers & David Lloyd

  2. Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    David Lloyd & Philip Roetman

Authors
  1. Kathryn Paige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yvonne Zeegers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Lloyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philip Roetman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Paige.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paige, K., Zeegers, Y., Lloyd, D. et al. RESEARCHING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SCIENCE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMME USING A PROPOSED CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS: A CASE STUDY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 149–175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9569-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9569-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation