Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

REPRESENTATIONAL PRACTICES IN EXTRA-CURRICULAR SCIENCE INQUIRY PROJECTS: A STUDY WITH ASIAN PRIMARY PUPILS

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Data collection, organization, and analysis are indispensable means of seeking solutions during the process of inquiry. Representations (called inscriptions by some educators) including graphs, tables, photographs, and equations are powerful ways of arranging and displaying data in visual form. This study aims to analyze quantitatively the use of representations by Key Stage 2 (KS2) students in extra-curricular science inquiry projects. The reports from 145 science inquiry projects entries in a primary science exhibition in Hong Kong were studied. A total of 22 projects were awarded Outstanding; 46 were awarded Merit; and 77 were awarded Consolation by the exhibition judges using well-established scoring rubrics and procedures. The ability to use different types of representations and the representational practices were studied across the three award classes. Levels of abstraction and functionality (constructing, interpreting, reasoning, and presenting) were determined for the representation types and practices demonstrated in the reports. The findings indicate that the highest level projects (judged Outstanding) tended to exhibit a higher frequency and more diverse use of representations. In addition, the three award levels also displayed different patterns of representational practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ainsworth, S., Prain, V. & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault, D. J., Smith, L. D. & Beauchamp, E. A. (2006). Visual inscriptions in the scientific hierarchy: Mapping the “Treasures of science”. Science Communication, 27(3), 376–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D. T. & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. M. & Roth, W.-M. (2002). Why students may not learn to interpret scientific inscriptions. Research in Science Education, 32, 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. M. & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Data and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1063–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttemer, H. (2006). Inquiry on board! Science and Children, 44(2), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, R. & Lind, K. K. (2010). Math and science for young children (6th ed.). New York: Delmar Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council (CDC). (2002a). General studies for primary schools curriculum guide (primary 1–primary 6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council (CDC). (2002b). Key learning area curriculum guide (primary 1–secondary 3)—Science education. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanjoy, L. P., MacNeill, A. L. & Best, L. A. (2012). The use of diagrams in science: An examination of trends in articles published in science between 1880 and 2010. In P. T. Cox, B. Plimmer & P. J. Rodgers (Eds.), Diagrams (pp. 303–305). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R. & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and inscriptional implications. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. & Roth, W.-M. (2007). Chemical inscriptions in Korean textbooks: Semiotics of macro and microworld. Science Education, 90(2), 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindfield, A. C. H. & Singer-Gabella, M. (2010). Inscriptional practices in undergraduate introductory science courses: A path toward improving prospective K-6 teachers’ understanding and teaching of science. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(3), 58–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2002). Symbolic communication in mathematics and science: Co-constructing inscription and thought. In E. Amsel & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development: The development and consequences of symbolic communication (pp. 167–192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford, E., Melear, C. T., Roth, W.-M., Perkins, M. & Hickok, L. G. (2007). Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 538–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, E., Garcia-Mila, M., Gabucio, F. & Konstantinidou, K. (2011). The construction of a double-entry table: A study of primary and secondary school students’ difficulties. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minogue, J., Wiebe, E., Madden, L., Bedward, J. & Carter, M. (2010). Graphically enhanced science notebooks. Science and Children, 48(3), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S. E., Nerdel, C. & Precht, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge? Learning and Instruction, 14, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzer, L. L. & Roth, W.-M. (2003). Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1089–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. L. & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Toward a social practice perspective on the work of reading inscriptions in science texts. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 228–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, D. N. & Kurby, C. A. (2008). The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of learning: Internal representations and external visualizations. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T., Carpenter, T. & Kwako, J. (2005). Standards based reform and teaching for understanding. In T. Romberg, T. Carpenter & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2005). Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration of understanding: An ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 75–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. & Han, J. Y. (2005). Critical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practices in school science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Stubbs, D. A., Archibald, A. B. & Roberson-Nay, R. (2002). Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. American Psychologist, 57, 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Stubbs, D. A., Johnston, J. & Archibald, A. B. (2000). Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: A Latourian survey of inscription practices. Social Studies of Science, 30(1), 70–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, W. M. W. (2003). Learning science through investigations: An experience with Hong Kong primary school children. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 175–200.

  • So, W. M. W. (2006, June). Inquiry into primary pupils’ science projects: Implication for design of inquiry learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1), Article 3. Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v7_issue1/sowm/abstract.htm.

  • So, W. M. W., & Cheng, M. H. M. (2001, December). Developing scientific literacy for student teachers through active learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(2), Article 3. Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v2_issue2/sowm/abstract.htm.

  • So, W. M. W., & Zhong, M. (2006). Primary science inquiry activities: Promoting the development of children’s scientific thinking. Journal of Basic Education, 15(1), 59–75.

  • So, W. M. W., & Zhong. M. (2009). Myths of science: How children know about science in inquiry projects. The International Journal of Science in Society, 1(2), 31–44.

  • So, W. W. M. (2013). Connecting mathematics and science in primary science inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 385–406.

  • Sutopo & Waldrip, B. ( 2013). Impact of a representational approach on students’ reasoning and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9431-y.

  • Tippett, C. D. (2011). Exploring middle school students’ representational competence in science: Development and verification of a framework for learning with visual representations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://dspace.library.uvic.ca:8080/handle/1828/3250?show=full.

  • Trowbridge, L., Bybee, R. & Powell, J. (2004). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (2005). Understanding graphs and tables. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Graphic discovery: A trout in the milk and other visual adventures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y. & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all learners. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J. & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K. & Krajcik, J. S. (2006a). Exploring middle school students’ use of inscriptions in project-based science classrooms. Science Education, 90(5), 852–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K. & Krajcik, J. S. (2006b). Inscriptional practices in two inquiry-based classrooms: A case study of seventh graders’ use of data tables and graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 63–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L. D. & Hand, B. (2010). Epilogue: Plotting a research agenda for multiple representations, multiple modality, and multimodal representational competency [Special issue]. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. D3-1/F-36, Department of Science and Environmental Studies, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, Hong Kong

    Winnie W. M. So

Authors
  1. Winnie W. M. So
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winnie W. M. So.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

So, W.W.M. REPRESENTATIONAL PRACTICES IN EXTRA-CURRICULAR SCIENCE INQUIRY PROJECTS: A STUDY WITH ASIAN PRIMARY PUPILS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 55–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9566-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9566-5

Key words

Search

Navigation