Skip to main content
Log in

On Understanding the Notion of Limits and Infinitesimal Quantities

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we explore the influence of students’ personalized notion of ‘small’ numbers based on real life experiences on their understanding of limits. Tests were conducted on two samples of students. The first sample, consisting of students in the XII grade, had been taught limits using an informal approach (i.e., without recourse to the \( \in - \delta \) definition) and the second sample, consisting of first year undergraduates, had been taught the formal \( \in - \delta \) definition of limits. Our research points out that most students in both samples round off to zero such ‘small numbers’ while evaluating limits wherever such numbers might occur because they perceive limit as a process of approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E. & Schwingendorff, K.E. (1997). The development of students’ graphical understanding of the derivative. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 399–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: J. Vrin (Reprinted 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A.D. & Tall, D.O. (1997). Cognitive units connections and mathematical proof. Proceedings of the 21st PME Conference, Lahti, Finland, 2, 41–48.

  • Berry, J.S. & Nyman, M.A. (2003). Promoting students’ graphical understanding of calculus. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1983). Les obstacles épistémologiques et le problèmes en mathematiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 4, 165–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. & Oehrtman, M. (2005). Key aspects of knowing and learning the concept of function, research sampler #9. Mathematics Association of America, http://www.maa.org/t_and_l/sampler/research_sampler.html. Accessed 04 July 2006.

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornu, B. (1980). Interference des modeles spontanes dan l’apprentissage de las notion de limite. Seminaire de Recherche Pedagogique, 8.

  • Cornu, B. (1983). Quelques obstacles a l’apprentissage de la notion of de limite. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 4, 236–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D.O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K. & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R.B. & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T. & Vinner, S. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervynck, G. (1981). Conceptual difficulties for first year university students in aquisition for the notion of limit of a function. In L.P. Mendoza & E.R. WIllams (Eds.), Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, Kingston, Ontario, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 330–333.

  • Ferrini-Mundy, J. & Graham, K.G. (1991). An overview of the calculus curriculum reform effort: Issues for learning teaching and curriculum development. American Mathematical Monthly, 98, 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. & Tall, D.O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 116–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid, K.M. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.L. (1989). Participant observation, a methodology for human studies. London: Sage.

  • Koirala, H.P. (1997). Teaching of calculus for students’ conceptual understanding. The Mathematics Educator, 2, 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. & Tall, D.O. (1993). Constructing different concept images of sequences and limits by programming. Proceedings of PME 17, Japan, 2, 41–48.

  • Mamona-Downs, J. (1990). Pupils’ interpretation of the limit concept: A comparison between Greeks and English. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Mexico City, 69–76.

  • Mason, J. & Johnson-Wilder, S. (2004). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, E. (1996). Novice mathematicians’ encounter with mathematical abstractions: Tensions in concept-image construction and formalisations. PhD Dissertation, Oxford: Oxford University.

  • Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of integration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, A. (1982). L’Acquisition de la notion de convergence des suites numeriques dans l’enseignement superieur. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 3, 307–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1985). Obstacles epistemologiques relatifs a la notion de limite. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 6, 5–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1990). Some remarks on understanding in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1987). Calculus (p. 63). California: Brooks/Cole Publ. Monterey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szydlik, J.E. (2000). Mathematical beliefs and conceptual understanding of the limit of a function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 258–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O. (1980a). Mathematical intuition with special reference to limiting processes. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematics Education, Berkeley, 170–176.

  • Tall, D.O. (1980b). Intuitive infinitesimals in the calculus. Poster presented in Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematics Education, Berkeley, C5.

  • Tall, D.O. (1980c). The notion of infinite measuring number and its relevance in the intuition of infinity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O. (1981). Intuitions of infinity. Mathematics in School, 10, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity and proof. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 495–511). New York: Macmillan.

  • Tall, D.O. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 14, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1983). Learning as a constructive activity. Proceedings of the fifth PME-NA, Montreal, vol. 1, 41–69.

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Abstraction, representation and reflection. In L. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 45–67). New York: Springer.

  • Williams, S. (1991). Models of limit held by college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (2001). Predications of the limit concept: An application of repertory grids. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Revathy Parameswaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parameswaran, R. On Understanding the Notion of Limits and Infinitesimal Quantities. Int J Sci Math Educ 5, 193–216 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9050-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9050-y

Key words

Navigation