Skip to main content
Log in

Generative Paradox in Learner-Centered College Teaching

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The discussion identifies six contradictions that characterize the emergent learner-centered teaching role: (a) control/flow, (b) facilitator/evaluator, (c) teacher learning/student learning, (d) subject expert/teaching expert, (e) caring for students/caring for self, and (f) individual mentor/group leader. Key concepts are presented (conflict, compartmentalized paradox, and generative paradox) which represent points on a continuum of the degree to which college teachers have successfully integrated these fundamental contradictions in the learner-centered teaching role. This article extends an ongoing discussion of integrity in learner-centered teaching by providing a conceptual paradigm and examples for developing consistently productive responses to these six fundamental contradictions in learner-centered teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson, J. (1962). The teacher as model. In N. Sanford (Ed.), The American college: A psychological and social interpretation of the higher learning (pp. 396–417). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, J. (1973). The university teacher as artist: Toward an aesthetic of teaching with emphasis on the humanities. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. A., III, Roueche, J. E., & Gillett-Karam, R. (1990). Teaching as leading: Profiles of excellence in the open-door college. Washington, DC: The Community College Press/American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, W. (1790/1963). The marriage of heaven and hell. Coral Gable, FL: University of Miami Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, F. S. (1945). The crack-up. New York, NY: New Directions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and womens development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, H. (1972). Inside and outside. In R. Manhein (Ed. and Trans.), Stories of Five decades (pp. 258–270). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. D., Arnold, S. M., Binder, J. L., Cytrynbaum, S., Newman, B. M., Ringwald, B. E., et al. (1970). The college classroom: Conflict, change, and learning. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teachers life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. D. (1989). Three stages of teacher competence: A developmental perspective. In E. Hayes (Ed.), Effective teaching styles (pp. 77–88). New Directions for Continuing Education (Vol. 43). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. D., & Associates (1998). Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, N. B. (1978). Faculty development: A stage conception. Improving College and University Teaching, 26, 61–63, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. A. (2002). Ironies of effective teaching: Deep structure learning and constructions of the classroom. Teaching Sociology, 30, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. L. (1988). Self-directed growth. Muncie, IN: Accelerated Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. L. (1996). Facilitating transformative learning: Attending to the dynamics of the educational helping relationship. Adult Education Quarterly, 47, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. L. (1997). Transformative learning and transition theory: Toward developing the ability to facilitate insight. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8, 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. L. (1999a). Unconscious displacements in college teacher and student relationships: Conceptualizing, identifying, and managing transference. Innovative Higher Education, 23, 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. L. (1999b). Professors’ perspectives on their teaching: A new construct and developmental model. Innovative Higher Education, 23, 271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. L. (2000a). Enriching the scholarship of teaching: Determining appropriate cross-professional applications among teaching, counseling, and psychotherapy. Innovative Higher Education, 25, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. R. (2000b). Professors in space and time: Four utilities of a new metaphor and developmental model for professors-as-teachers. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 11, 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. R. (2001). Beyond learner-centeredness: Close encounters of the systemocentric kind. Journal of Faculty Development, 18, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. R. (2001–2002). College teaching as an educational helping relationship. Essays on Teaching Excellence (Vol. 13, p. 1). Ft. Collins, CO: The POD Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. R. (2002). Creating and supporting an inclusive scholarship of teaching. The Eastern Scholar, 1, 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. R. (2003a). Getting personal about professional development: Why we don’t innovate (even when we want to). Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, 1. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/TLC/MAINPOSTER/galleyproof/Robertson.pdf, pp. 1–23. January 5, 2005.

  • Robertson, D. R. (2003b). Integrity in learner-centered teaching. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy, 21(pp. 196–211). Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. R. (2003c). Making time, making change: Avoiding overload in college teaching. Stillwater, OK: New Forums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, T. M., Armistead, L. P., Fowler, F., Barksdale, M. A., & Reif, G. (1987). The quest for excellence in university teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 48, 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, R. G., Sinai, J., & Flak, E. A. (2002). The role of teacher–learner relationships in medical education. In G. R. Norman, C. P. M. Van der Vleuten, & D. I. Newble (Eds.), International handbook of research in medical education (pp. 463–497). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language Unabridged (1966). Springfield, IL: G. & C. Merriam.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Douglas Reimondo Robertson (Ph.D., Syracuse University) is Assistant Provost for Professional Development Programs and Professor of Educational Leadership at Northern Kentucky University. His most recent line of research focuses on further developing the emergent concept and practice of learner-centered college teaching.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, D.R. Generative Paradox in Learner-Centered College Teaching. Innov High Educ 29, 181–194 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-1935-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-1935-0

Keywords

Navigation