Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Potential phytoplankton indicator species for monitoring Baltic coastal waters in the summer period

  • EUTROPHICATION IN COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are very few time series documenting clear trends of change in the biomass of total phytoplankton or single taxa that coincide with trends of increasing nutrient concentrations. Weekly or biweekly monitoring since 1997 on a cross section of the central Gulf of Finland (NE Baltic Sea) with similar climatic and hydrographic conditions, but different nutrient levels, provided a uniform dataset. In order to evaluate seasonal (June–September) patterns of phytoplankton succession, more than 1,200 samples were statistically analyzed by selecting 12 dominant taxa using wet weight biomass values. In addition, the continuously measured hydrographic parameters on board the ships of opportunity, and simultaneous nutrient analyses gave high frequency information on the water masses. The objective of this study was to identify the taxa that may prove indicative in the assessment of eutrophication in the appropriate monitoring time periods. None of the most common bloom-forming species (Aphanizomenon sp., Nodularia spumigena, and Heterocapsa triquetra) showed reliable correlations with enhanced nutrient concentrations. The species we suggest as reliable eutrophication indicators—oscillatorialean cyanobacteria and the diatoms Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana and Cylindrotheca closterium—showed the best relationships with total phosphorus concentrations. Their maxima appear toward the end of July or in August–September when phytoplankton community structure is more stable, and less frequent observations may give adequate results. Another diatom, Skeletonema costatum, exhibited stronger correlations with dissolved inorganic and total nitrogen in June, during the period of the summer phytoplankton minimum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, A., S. Hajdu, P. Haecky, J. Kuparinen & J. Wikner, 1996. Succession and growth limitation of phytoplankton in the Gulf of Bothnia (Baltic Sea). Marine Biology 126: 791–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, T. S., P. Westman, C. Rolff, E. Engelhaupt, T. Andrén & R. Elmgren, 2000. Cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea: natural or human induced? Limnology and Oceanography 45: 716–726.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borum, J., 1996. Shallow waters and land/sea boundaries. In Jørgensen, B. B. & K. Richardson (eds.), Eutrophication in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington: 179–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadee, G. C., 1992. Trends in Marsdiep phytoplankton. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 20: 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederwall, H. & R. Elmgren, 1990. Biological effects of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea, particularly in the coastal zone. Ambio 19: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 2001. Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd Edn. Plymouth Marine Laboratory.

  • Clarke, A. L., K. Weckström, D. J. Conley, & et al., 2006. Long-term trends in eutrophication and nutrients in the coastal zone. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E., 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210: 223–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. R., 1995. Chesapeake Bay historical land use: impact on water quality and diatom communities. Ecological Applications 5: 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Communities, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Legislative acts and other instruments. ENV221 CODEC 513.

  • Finni, T., K. Kononen, R. Olsonen & K. Wallström, 2001a. The history of cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea. Ambio 30: 172–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finni, T., S. Laurila & S. Laakkonen, 2001b. The history of eutrophication the sea area of Helsinki in the 20th century. Long-term analysis of plankton assemblages. Ambio 30: 264–271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gasiùnaite, Z. R., A. C. Cardoso, A.-S. Heiskanen, P. Henriksen, P. Kauppila, I. Olenina, R. Pilkaityte, I. Purina, A. Razinkovas, S. Sagert, H. Schubert & N. Wasmund, 2005. Seasonality of coastal phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea: influence of salinity and eutrophication. Estuarine, Coastal & Shelf Science 65: 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. R., D. K. Clark, J. W. Brown, O. B. Brown, R. H. Evans & W. W. Broenkow, 1983. Phytoplankton pigment concentrations in the Middle Atlantic Bight: comparison of ship determinations and CZCS estimates. Applied Optics 22: 20–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guildford, S. J. & R. E. Hecky, 2000. Total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nutrient limitation in lakes and oceans: is there a common relationship? Limnology and Oceanography 45: 1213–1223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajdu, S., S. Pertola & H. Kuosa, 2004. Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae) in the Baltic Sea: morphology, occurrence—a review. Harmful Algae 4: 471–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hällfors, G., 2004. Checklist of Baltic Sea Phytoplankton Species (including some heterotrophic protistan groups). Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings 95, 210 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, C. A., 2005. Influence of humic, fulvic and hydrophilic acids on the growth, photosynthesis and respiration of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum (Pavillard) Schiller. Harmful Algae 4: 603–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HELCOM, 1988. Guidelines for the Baltic Monitoring Programme for the third stage: Part D. Biological Determinands. Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings 27D, 161 pp.

  • Hillebrand, H., C.-D. Dürselen, D. Kirschtel, U. Pollingher & T. Zohary, 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 403–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, M. V., T. K. Frazer, S. K. Notestein & D. E. Canfield Jr., 2002. Nutrient, chlorophyll, and water clarity relationships in Florida’s nearshore coastal waters with comparisons to freshwater lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1024–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaanus, A., 2003. Water environment of Haapsalu Bay in retrospect (1975–2000). Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Ecology 52: 91–111.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahru, M., U. Horstmann & O. Rud, 1994. Increased cyanobacterial blooming in the Baltic Sea detected by satellites: natural fluctuation or ecosystem change? Ambio 23: 469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononen, K., 1988. Phytoplankton summer assemblages in relation to environmental factors at the entrance to the Gulf of Finland during 1972–1985. Kieler Meeresforschungen 6(Sonderheft): 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononen, K., 1992. Dynamics of the toxic cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea. Finnish Marine Research 261: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuosa, H., 1988. Observations on the taxonomy and ecology of Monoraphidium (Chlorophyceae, Chlorococcales) and Koliella (Chlorophyceae, Ulotrichales) species in the Tvärminne Sea area, SW coast of Finland. Archiv für Protistenkunde 135: 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutser, T., 2004. Quantitative detection of chlorophyll in cyanobacterial blooms by satellite remote sensing. Limnology and Oceanography 49: 2179–2189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagus, A., J. Suomela, G. Weithoff, K. Heikkilä, H. Helminen & J. Sipura, 2004. Species-specific differences in phytoplankton responses to N and P enrichments and the N:P ratio in the Archipelago Sea, northern Baltic Sea. Journal of Plankton Research 26: 779–798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, T. & C. Nummelin, 1999. Red tide of the dinoflagellate Heterocapsa triquetra (Dinophyta) in a ferry-mixed coastal inlet. Hydrobiologia 393: 245–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. G. & R. W. Alden, 1990. A comparison of phytoplankton assemblages and environmental relationships in three estuarine rivers of the lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 13: 287–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millie, D. F., H. W. Pearl & J. P. Hurley, 1993. Microalgal pigment assessments using high-performance liquid chromatography: a synopsis of organismal and ecological applications. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 2513–2527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, Å., 1979. Blue-green algal blooms and N:P ratio in the Baltic Sea. Acta Botanica Fennica 110: 57–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, Å. & G. Hällfors, 1974. Some phytoplankton species from Baltic waters. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 49: 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixdorf, B., U. Mischke & J. Rücker, 2003. Phytoplankton assemblages and steady state in deep and shallow eutrophic lakes—an approach to differentiate the habitat properties of Oscillatoriales. Hydrobiologia 502: 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olli, K. & J. Seppälä, 2001. Vertical niche separation of phytoplankton: large-scale mesocosm experiments. Marine Ecology Progress Series 217: 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olli, K., A.-S. Heiskanen & J. Seppälä, 1996. Development and fate of Eutreptiella gymnastica bloom in nutrient-enriched enclosures in the coastal Baltic Sea. Journal of Plankton Research 18: 1587–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paerl, H. W., L. M. Valdes, B. L. Peierls, J. E. Adolf & L. W. Harding Jr., 2006. Anthropogenic and climatic influences on the eutrophication of large estuarine ecosystems. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 448–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Painting, S. J., M. J. Devlin, S. I. Rogers, D. K. Mills, E. R. Parker & H. L. Rees, 2005. Assessing the suitability of OSPAR EcoQOs for eutrophication vs ICES criteria for England and Wales. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50: 1569–1584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pertola, S., H. Kuosa & R. Olsonen, 2004. Is the invasion of Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae) related to the nitrogen enrichment of the Baltic Sea? Harmful Algae 4: 481–492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rantajärvi, E., V. Gran, S. Hällfors & R. Olsonen, 1997. Effects of environmental factors on the phytoplankton community in the Gulf of Finland—unattended high frequency measurements and multivariate analyses. Hydrobiologia 363: 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. I. & B. Greenaway, 2005. A UK perspective on the development of marine ecosystem indicators. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50: 9–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. H., 2006. Responses of estuarine and coastal marine phytoplankton to nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 377–384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, J., 1996. The significance of observed nutrient concentrations in the discussion about nitrogen and phosphorus as limiting nutrients for the primary carbon flux in coastal water ecosystems. Sarsia 81: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, C. (ed.), 1997. Identifying Marine Phytoplankton. Academic Press, London.

  • Turner, R. E., N. N. Rabalais, B. Fry, N. Atilla, C. S. Milan, J. M. Lee, C. Normandeau, T. A. Oswald, E. M. Swenson & D. A. Tomasko, 2006. Paleo-indicators and water quality change in the Charlotte Harbor estuary (Florida). Limnology and Oceanography 51: 518–533.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Utermöhl, H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplanktonmethodik. Mitteilungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 9: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuorio, K., A. Lagus, J. M. Lehtimäki, J. Suomela & H. Helminen, 2005. Phytoplankton community responses to nutrient and iron enrichment under different nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in the northern Baltic Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 322: 39–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wänstrand, I. & P. Snoeijs, 2006. Phytoplankton community dynamics assessed by ships-of-opportunity sampling in the northern Baltic Sea: a comparison of HPLC pigment analysis and cell counts. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 66: 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasmund, N., A. Andrushaitis, E. Łysiak-Pastuszak, B. Müller-Karulis, G. Nausch, T. Neumann, H. Ojaveer, I. Olenina, L. Postel & Z. Witek, 2001. Trophic status of the South-eastern Baltic Sea: a comparison of coastal and open areas. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53: 849–864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was financially supported by the Estonian and Finnish Ministries of Environment, and the EU project FerryBox (EVK2-2001-00230). The cooperation of Silja Line and Tallink shipping companies made data collection possible. The nutrient analyses were conducted by the City of Helsinki Environment Centre and Uusimaa Regional Environmental Centre laboratories in 1997–2003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Mäealuse 10a, 12618, Tallinn, Estonia

    Andres Jaanus, Kaire Toming & Kaire Kaljurand

  2. Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Erik Palménin aukio 1, 00561, Helsinki, Finland

    Seija Hällfors

  3. Marine Systems Institute, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia 21, 12618, Tallinn, Estonia

    Inga Lips

Authors
  1. Andres Jaanus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaire Toming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seija Hällfors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaire Kaljurand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Inga Lips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Jaanus.

Additional information

Guest editors: J. H. Andersen & D. J. Conley

Eutrophication in Coastal Ecosystems: Selected papers from the Second International Symposium on Research and Management of Eutrophication in Coastal Ecosystems, 20–23 June 2006, Nyborg, Denmark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaanus, A., Toming, K., Hällfors, S. et al. Potential phytoplankton indicator species for monitoring Baltic coastal waters in the summer period. Hydrobiologia 629, 157–168 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9768-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9768-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation