Abstract
Based on a mixed-methods study involving triad tasks and ethnobiological models, we analyze local categories and knowledge of key ethnospecies of fish exploring partial overlaps between artisanal fishers’ and academic knowledge in a fishing community in northeast Brazil. We argue that fishers’ and academic knowledge overlaps may provide common ground for transdisciplinary collaboration, while their partiality requires reflection on epistemological and ontological differences. Here, we show how knowledge of artisanal fishers can complement academic knowledge and bring about tensions that need to be addressed through intercultural dialogue. By integrating a general philosophical framework of partial overlaps with a mixed-methods study on fishers’ knowledge, we show how ethnobiology can contribute to reflective and empirically-grounded transdisciplinary practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because they contain information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent. However, they are available from the corresponding author upon request, according to an ethical agreement with third parties that guarantee the protection of the privacy and confidentially of the participants.
Notes
Most of the information provided on the community results from our own interview data and participant observation in the larger project in which the present study is included.
References
Albuquerque, U. P., Ludwig, D., Feitosa, I. S., de Moura, J. M. B., de Medeiros, P. M., Gonçalves, P. H. S., Silva, R. H., Silva, T. C., Souza, T. G., & Júnior, W. S. F. (2020). Addressing Social-Ecological Systems across Temporal and Spatial Scales: A Conceptual Synthesis for Ethnobiology. Human Ecology, 48(5), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00189-7
Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology, 26, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211
Begossi, A. (2008). Local knowledge and training towards management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(5), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9150-7
Begossi, A., Salivonchyk, S., Lopes, P. F., & Silvano, R. A. (2016). Fishers’ knowledge on the coast of Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 12(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0091-1
Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press.
Berlin, E. A., & Berlin, B. (1996). Medical Ethnobiology of the Highland Maya of Chiapas. Princeton University Press, Berlin.
Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (5th ed.). AltaMira Press.
Beuving, J., & de Vries, G. (2015). Doing qualitative research: The craft of naturalistic inquiry. Amsterdam University Press.
BirdLife International. (2018a). Buteogallus aequinoctialis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018a: e.T22695808A131937283. Downloaded on 20 June 2021.
BirdLife International. (2018b). Pyrrhura griseipectus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018b: e.T22733968A132181930. Downloaded on 20 June 2021.
Borgatti, S. P. (1992). Anthropac 4.98. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies [web page]. URL: http://www.analytictech.com. Accessed on 22 August 2019.
Bórquez, A., & Cerqueira, V. R. (1998). Feeding behavior in juvenile snook, Centropomus undecimalis: I. Individual effect of some chemical substances. Aquaculture, 169, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00331-7
Boyd, R. N. (1999). Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa. In R. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays (pp. 141–185). MIT Press.
Brazil. (1992). Portaria Ibama N° 49-N de 13 de Maio de 1992.
Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell J. Y. (2010). Tackling Wicked Problems through the Transdisciplinary Imagination. Earthscan.
Burton, M. L., & Nerlove, S. B. (1976). Balanced designs for triads tests: Two examples from English. Social Science Research, 5, 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(76)90002-8
Butler, C. (2004). Researching traditional ecological knowledge for multiple uses. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 28(1/2), 33–48.
Cervigón, F. (1992). Guía de campo de las especies comerciales marinas y de aguas salobres de la costa septentrional de Sur América, Roma, FAO.
Chaves, L. D. S., Nascimento, A. L. B. D., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2019). What matters in free listing? Acta Botanica Brasilica, 33, 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062018abb0330
Clauzet, M., Ramires, M., & Barrella, W. (2005). Pesca artesanal e conhecimento local de duas populações caiçaras (Enseada do Mar Virado e Barra do Una) no litoral de São Paulo. Brasil. Multiciência, 4(1), 1–22.
Daly, L., French, K., Miller, T. L., & Nic Eoin, L. (2016). Integrating Ontology into Ethnobotanical Research. Journal of Ethnobiology, 36, 1–9.
Davis, A., & Wagner, J. R. (2003). Who knows? On the importance of identifying “experts” when researching local ecological knowledge. Human Ecology, 31, 463–489. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025075923297
Descola, P. (2005). Par-Delà Nature et Culture. Editions Gallimard.
Dupré, J. (1995). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press.
Ellen, R. (2016). Is There a Role for Ontologies in Understanding Plant Knowledge Systems? Journal of Ethnobiology, 36, 10–28. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-36.1.10
Ereshefsky, M. (1991). Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution. Philosophy of Science, 58, 84–101.
Fishbase. (2020). Centropomus undecimalis [web page]. URL: https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Centropomus-undecimalis.html. Accessed on 22 March 2020.
Florida Museum of Natural History. (2020). Centropomus undecimalis [web page]. URL: https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/discover-fish/species-profiles/centropomus-undecimalis/. Accessed on 18 May 2020.
Fraser, T. H. (1978). Centropomidae. In FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. West Atlantic (Fishing Area 31), edited by W. Fischer. FAO, Rome.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Galison, P., & Stump, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford University Press.
Guimarães, L. M., Lima, T. D. A. C., França, E. J. D., Arruda, G. N. D., Souza, J. R. B. D., & Albergaria-Barbosa, A. C. R. D. (2019). Impactos da mudança de vegetação local no aporte de matéria orgânica para um estuário tropical preservado (estuário do rio Itapicuru – BA). Química Nova, 35, 427–448. https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170370
Guimarães, L. M., França, E. J., Arruda, G. N., & Albergaria-Barbosa, A. C. R. (2020). Historical inputs of polycyclicic aromatic hydrocarbons in the preserved tropical estuary of the Itapicuru River, Bahia. Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 156, 111218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111218
Hunn, E. (1977). Tzeltal Folk Zoology: The Classification of Discontinuities in Nature. Academic Press.
Huntington, H. (2000). Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 10, 1270–1274. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2
International Society of Ethnobiology. (2006). International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions) [web page]. URL: https://www.ethnobiology.net/what-we-do/core-programs/ise-ethics-program/code-of-ethics/code-in-english/. Accessed on 22 March 2020.
Kierulff, M. C. M., Mendes, S. L., & Rylands, A. B. (2015). Sapajus xanthosternos. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T4074A70615251. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-1.RLTS.T4074A70615251.en. Downloaded on 20 June 2021.
Kimmerer, R. W. (2012). Searching for synergy: Integrating traditional and scientific ecological knowledge in environmental science education. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(4), 317–323.
Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think. University of California Press.
Koskinen, I., & Rolin, K. (2019). Scientific/intellectual movements remedying epistemic injustice: The case of indigenous studies. Philosophy of Science, 86, 1052–1063.
Ludwig, D. (2018a). Revamping the Metaphysics of Ethnobiological Classification. Current Anthropology, 59, 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1086/698958
Ludwig, D. (2018b). Does Cognition Still Matter in Ethnobiology?. Ethnobiology Letters, 9, 269–275.
Ludwig, D., & Poliseli, L. (2018). Relating traditional and academic ecological knowledge: Mechanistic and holistic epistemologies across cultures. Biology & Philosophy, 33, 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9655-x
Ludwig, D., & Weiskopf, D. A. (2019). Ethnoontology: Ways of World-Building across Cultures. Philosophy Compass, 14, e12621. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12621
Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2020). Philosophy of ethnobiology: Understanding knowledge integration and its limitations. Journal of Ethnobiology, 40, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-40.1.3
McAlvay, A. C., Armstrong, C. G., Baker, J., Elk, L. B., Bosco, S., Hanazaki, N., Leigh, J., Martínez-Cruz, T. E., Nesbitt, M., Palmer, M. A., de Almeida, W. C. P., Anderson, J., Asfaw, Z., Borokini, I. T., Cano-Contreras, E. J., Hoyte, S., Hudson, M., Ladio, A. H., Odonne, G., … Vandebroek, I. (2021). Ethnobiology phase VI: Decolonizing institutions, projects, and scholarship. Journal of Ethnobiology, 41, 170–191. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.170
Marshall, A. R. (1958). A survey of the snook fishery of Florida, with studies of the biology of the principal species, Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch). Florida State Board Conservation Technical Series, 22, 1–37.
Mourão, J. D. S., & Montenegro, S. C. S. (2006). Pescadores e Peixes: o conhecimento local e o uso da taxonomia folk baseado no modelo berlineano. Recife: NUPEEA/Sociedade Brasileira de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia.
Musiello-Fernandes, J., Zappes, C. A., & Hostim-Silva, M. (2017). Small-scale shrimp fisheries on the Brazilian coast. Ocean & Coastal Management, 148, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.018
Nabhan, G. P. (2016). Ethnobiology for the Future. University of Arizona Press.
Nadasdy, P. (1999). The Politics of TEK. Power and the ‘Integration’ of Knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 36, 1–18.
Nadasdy, P. (2003). Hunters and Bureaucrats. UBC Press.
Nadasdy, P. (2005). The Anti-Politics of TEK: The Institutionalization of Co-Management Discourse and Practice. Anthropologica, 47, 215–232.
Nora, V. (2013). Ecologia e etnoecologia de robalos (Centropomus undecimalis, Bloch, 1792 e Centropomus parallelus, Poey, 1860) na Baía de Paraty. Universidade Santa Cecília.
Ott, C. F. (1944). Os elementos culturais da pescaria baiana. Boletim Do Museu Nacional, 4, 1–67.
Pereira, M. E. G. S., da Silva, B. B., da Rocha, R. M., Asp-Neto, N. E., da Silva, C. S., & Nunes, Z. M. P. (2015). Bioecologia do robalo-flexa, Centropomus undecimalis, em lagoa costeira tropical no norte do Brasil. Boletim Do Instituto De Pesca, 41, 457–469.
Peters, K. M., Matheson, R. E., Jr., & Taylor, R. G. (1998). Reproduction and early life history of common snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch), in Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62, 509–529.
Pieroni, A. (2006). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine – Achievements and Perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-10
Pohl, C., Truffer, B., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2017). Addressing Wicked Problems through Transdisciplinary Research. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.26
Poliseli, L., & El-Hani, C. N. (2020). Imagination in Science. In A Theory of Imagining, Knowing, and Understanding, edited by L. Tateo. pp. 65–84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38025-0_8
Rist, S., & Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2006). Ethnosciences - A step towards the integration of scientific and indigenous forms of knowledge in the management of natural resources for the future. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8, 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9050-7
Ross, N., Barrientos, T., & Esquit-Choy, A. (2005). Triad Tasks, a Multipurpose Tool to Elicit Similarity Judgments: The Case of Tzotzil Maya Plant Taxonomy. Field Methods, 17, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05277861
Russell, D. J. E., & Rimmer, M. A. (1999). Stock enhancement of barramundi (Lates calcarifer) in a coastal river in northern Queensland, Australia. World Aquaculture '99 'Bridging the Gap' Annual International Conference and Exposition of the World Aquaculture Society, Sydney.
Santos, B. S. (2015). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge.
Sillitoe, P. (1998). The development of Indigenous knowledge: A new applied Anthropology. Current Anthropology, 19, 223–235.
Smith, C. L. (1997). National Audubon Society field guide to tropical marine fishes of the Caribbean, the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, the Bahamas, and Bermuda. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, R. G., Whittington, J. A., & Haymans, D. E. (2001). Catch-and-release mortality rates of common snook in Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 21(1), 70–75.
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio, 43, 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3
Tilghman, R. W., Ross, C. I., Mari, F., & Hartmann, J. X. (1996). Parvalbumins as a biomarker for fish species identification: applications to snook (Centropomus undecimalis) preservation. In OCEANS 96 MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings. The Coastal Ocean-Prospects for the 21st Century (Vol. 3, pp. 1372–1375). IEEE.
Tng, D. Y., Apgaua, D. M. G., Lisboa, M. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2021). Gender differences in plant use knowledge within a traditional fishing community in northeastern Brazil. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 21. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.21.12.1-36
Turner, N. J., Ignace, M. B., & Ignace, R. (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of aboriginal peoples in British Columbia. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1275–1287.
Renck, V., Apgaua, D.M., Tng, D.Y., Bollettin, P., Ludwig, D. & El-Hani, C.N. (2022). Cultural consensus and intracultural diversity in ethnotaxonomy: lessons from a fishing community in Northeast Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00522-y
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). Cannibal Metaphysics. Univocal Publishing.
Wanderer, J. (2011). Addressing Testimonial Injustice: Being Ignored and Being Rejected. The Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.712.x
Wilson, R. A., Barker, M. J., & Brigandt, I. (2007). When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds. Philosophical Topics, 35, 189–215. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2007351/29
Wolverton, S. (2013). Ethnobiology 5: Interdisciplinarity in an Era of Rapid Environmental Change. Ethnobiology Letters, 4, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.4.2013.11
Wyndham, F. S., Lepofsky, D., & Tiffany, S. (2011). Taking Stock in Ethnobiology: Where Do We Come from? What Are We? Where Are We Going? Journal of Ethnobiology, 31, 110–127. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-31.1.110
Zent, S. (2009). A Genealogy of Scientific Representations of Indigenous Knowledge. In Landscape, process and power, edited by S. Heckler, pp. 19–67. Berghahn Books.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank all of the community of Siribinha for sharing their knowledge and experience with us and welcoming us with open arms. This research would not have been even started without their engagement. We would also like to thank Deborah Apgaua and David Tng for analyses of the triad task data, José Amorim Reis Filho for sharing his photos and insights on fisheries resources, and also for the fish identification, and Stephen Borgatti for helping with Anthropac.
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)–Finance Code 001. VR was awarded a writing-up fellowship at the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research. CNEH, PB and VR are thankful to CNPq (grant number 465767/2014–1), CAPES (grant number 23038.000776/2017–54) and FAPESB (proc. no INC0006/2019) for their support of INCT INTREE. DL’s research has been supported by an ERC Starting Grant (851004 LOCAL KNOWLEDGE) and a NWO Vidi Grant (V1.Vidi.195.026 ETHNOONTOLOGIES). CNEH thanks CAPES and UFBA for Senior Visiting Researcher Grant (CAPES-PRINT) for a research stay in the Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Portugal (grant number 88887.465540/2019–00), and CNPq (proc. no 303011/2017–3) for a productivity in research grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
Across all stages, the participants provided informed verbal consent for the interviews, which was recorded at their beginning. The Committee has approved the project for Ethics in Research from the Nursing School of the Federal University of Bahia under n. 2.937.348 (Certificate of Presentation of Ethical Appreciation–CAAE–n. 97380718.3.0000.5531) followed Brazilian laws concerning ethical research procedures. It was also registered in the National System for the Management of Genetic Heritage and Associated Traditional Knowledge (SisGen) under n. A053F57. The ISE Code of Ethics principles were also followed in the study (International Society of Ethnobiology 2006).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no financial or nonfinancial conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Renck, V., Ludwig, D., Bollettin, P. et al. Exploring Partial Overlaps Between Knowledge Systems in a Brazilian Fishing Community. Hum Ecol 50, 633–649 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00335-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00335-3