Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Published:
Heart Failure Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, studies on the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have not been summarized and analyzed as a whole. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from dates of inception until May 1, 2023. The primary outcome was the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF, and values of CMD prevalence were pooled using a random-effects model. In total, 10 studies involving 1267 patients, including 822 with HFpEF and 445 without HFpEF, were included. The pooled prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF was 71% (95% CI, 0.63–0.79). In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence of CMD was 79% (95% CI, 0.71–0.87) by invasive measurement and 66% (95% CI, 0.54–0.77) by noninvasive measurement and 67% (95% CI, 0.52–0.82) with CFR < 2.0 and 75.0% (95% CI, 0.71–0.79) with CFR < 2.5. The prevalence of endothelium-independent CMD and endothelium-dependent CMD was 62% (95% CI, 0.53–0.72) and 50% (95% CI, 0.19–0.81), respectively. The prevalence of CMD was 74% (95% CI = 0.69–0.79) and 66% (95% CI = 0.41–0.90) in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Compared with the control group, patients with HFpEF had a significantly lower CFR (MD =  − 1.28, 95% CI =  − 1.82 to − 0.74, P < 0.01) and a higher prevalence of CMD (RR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.52 to 3.20, P < 0.01). Qualitative analysis demonstrated that CMD might be associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. In conclusion, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF. Our study demonstrates that CMD is common in patients with HFpEF and might be associated with poor clinical outcomes in these patients. Clinicians should attach importance to CMD in the diagnosis and treatment of HFpEF. The number of studies in this field is relatively small. Therefore, more high-quality studies are needed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMD and the potential role of CMD as a therapeutic target in patients with HFpEF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CMD:

Coronary microvascular dysfunction

HFpEF:

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

HF:

Heart failure

ACS:

Acute coronary syndromes

LV:

Left ventricular

RAS:

Renin-angiotensin system

MPR:

Myocardial perfusion reserve

CFVR:

Coronary flow velocity reserve

MFR:

Myocardial flow reserve

MBFR:

Myocardial blood flow reserve

CFR:

Coronary flow reserve

MACE:

Major adverse cardiovascular events

References

  1. Kanagala P, Cheng AS, Khan JN et al (2015) Unmasking the prevalence of silent myocardial infarction, ischaemia and microvascular dysfunction in HFPEF with CMR. Eur Heart J 36:538

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borlaug BA (2020) Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol 17(9):559–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Amario D, Migliaro S, Borovac JA et al (2019) Microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Front Physiol 10:1347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fopiano KA, Jalnapurkar S, Davila AC, Arora V, Bagi Z (2022) Coronary microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-implications for chronic inflammatory mechanisms. Curr Cardiol Rev 18(2):e310821195986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Giamouzis G, Schelbert EB, Butler J (2016) Growing evidence linking microvascular dysfunction with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 5(2)

  6. Lee JF, Barrett-O’Keefe Z, Garten RS et al (2016) Evidence of microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart 102(4):278–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tona F, Montisci R, Iop L, Civieri G (2021) Role of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Rev Cardiovasc Med 22(1):97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G et al (2021) Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 385(16):1451–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Butler J, Packer M, Filippatos G et al (2022) Effect of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 43(5):416–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kosiborod MN, Abildstrom SZ, Borlaug BA et al (2023) Semaglutide in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity. N Engl J Med 389(12):1069–1084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Camici PG, Tschope C, Di Carli MF, Rimoldi O, Van Linthout S (2020) Coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophy and heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 116(4):806–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam CSP, Voors AA, de Boer RA, Solomon SD, van Veldhuisen DJ (2018) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: from mechanisms to therapies. Eur Heart J 39(30):2780–2792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boerhout CKM, Lee JM, de Waard GA et al (2023) Microvascular resistance reserve: diagnostic and prognostic performance in the ILIAS registry. Eur Heart J 44(30):2862–2869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Canto ED, van Deursen L, Hoek AG et al (2023) Microvascular endothelial dysfunction in skin is associated with higher risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women with type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn diabetes care system cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol 22(1):234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Toya T, Nagatomo Y, Ikegami Y, Masaki N, Adachi T (2023) Coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure patients. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 10:1153994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JPT TJ CJ, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2021) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane

  17. Page MJMJBP et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Erik von Elm DGA, Matthias Egger et al (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335(7624):806–8

  19. Ahmad A, Corban MT, Toya T et al (2021) Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with exertional haemodynamic abnormalities in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 23(5):765–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arnold JR, Kanagala P, Budgeon CA et al (2022) Prevalence and prognostic significance of microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

  21. Dryer K, Gajjar M, Narang N et al (2018) Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 314(5):H1033–H1042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kato S, Saito N, Kirigaya H et al (2016) Impairment of coronary flow reserve evaluated by phase contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 5(2)

  23. Loffler AI, Pan JA, Balfour PC Jr et al (2019) Frequency of coronary microvascular dysfunction and diffuse myocardial fibrosis (measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance) in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 124(10):1584–1589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahfouz RA, Gouda M, Abdelhamid M (2020) Relation of microvascular dysfunction and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiography 37(8):1192–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rush CJ, Berry C, Oldroyd KG et al (2021) Prevalence of coronary artery disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiol 6(10):1130–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah SJ, Lam CSP, Svedlund S et al (2018) Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF. Eur Heart J 39(37):3439–3450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Srivaratharajah K, Coutinho T, deKemp R et al (2016) Reduced myocardial flow in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 9(7)

  28. Yang JH, Obokata M, Reddy YNV, Redfield MM, Lerman A, Borlaug BA (2020) Endothelium-dependent and independent coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 22(3):432–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Allan T, Dryer K, Fearon WF, Shah SJ, Blair JEA (2019) Coronary microvascular dysfunction and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Card Fail 25(10):843–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Paulus WJTC (2013) A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(4):263–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sucato V, Evola S, Novo G et al (2015) Angiographic evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Microcirculation 22(7):528–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohammed SF, Hussain S, Mirzoyev SA, Edwards WD, Maleszewski JJ, Redfield MM (2015) Coronary microvascular rarefaction and myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 131(6):550–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, Howard JP et al (2022) Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 43(16):1582–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gdowski MA, Murthy VL, Doering M, Monroy-Gonzalez AG, Slart R, Brown DL (2020) Association of isolated coronary microvascular dysfunction with mortality and major adverse cardiac events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. J Am Heart Assoc 9(9):e014954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M et al (2021) 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 42(36):3599–3726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Diabetes GBD, Air Pollution C (2022) Estimates, trends, and drivers of the global burden of type 2 diabetes attributable to PM(2.5) air pollution, 1990–2019: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Planet Health 6(7):e586-e600.

  37. Haagsma JA, James SL, Castle CD et al (2020) Burden of injury along the development spectrum: associations between the Socio-demographic index and disability-adjusted life year estimates from the Global burden of disease study 2017. Inj Prev 26(Supp 1):i12–i26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jakovljevic M, Chang H, Pan J et al (2023) Successes and challenges of China’s health care reform: a four-decade perspective spanning 1985–2023. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 21(1):59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Jakovljevic M, Fernandes PO, Teixeira JP, Rancic N, Timofeyev Y, Reshetnikov V (2019) Underlying differences in health spending within the world health organisation europe region-comparing EU15, EU Post-2004, CIS, EU Candidate, and CARINFONET Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(17)

  40. Jakovljevic M, Groot W, Souliotis K (2016) Editorial: health care financing and affordability in the emerging global markets. Front Public Health 4:2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jakovljevic M, Timofeyev Y, Ekkert NV et al (2019) The impact of health expenditures on public health in BRICS nations. J Sport Health Sci 8(6):516–519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Jakovljevic MB, Milovanovic O (2015) Growing burden of non-communicable diseases in the emerging health markets: the case of BRICS. Front Public Health 3:65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Katoue MG, Cerda AA, Garcia LY, Jakovljevic M (2022) Healthcare system development in the Middle East and North Africa region: challenges, endeavors and prospective opportunities. Front Public Health 10:1045739

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kumagai N, Nishimura S, Jakovljevic M (2023) Could high continuity of care (COC) have a negative impact on subjective health of hypertensive patients? A Japanese perspective. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 21(1):39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ranabhat CL, Jakovljevic M (2023) Sustainable health care provision worldwide: is there a necessary trade-off between cost and quality?. Sustainability 15(2)

  46. Ranabhat CL, Jakovljevic M, Dhimal M, Kim CB (2019) Structural factors responsible for universal health coverage in low- and middle-income countries: results from 118 countries. Front Public Health 7:414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sahoo PM, Rout HS, Jakovljevic M (2023) Future health expenditure in the BRICS countries: a forecasting analysis for 2035. Global Health 19(1):49

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sahoo PM, Rout HS, Jakovljevic M (2023) Dynamics of health financing among the brics: a literature review. Sustainability 15(16)

  49. Sapkota B, Palaian S, Shrestha S, Ozaki A, Mohamed Ibrahim MI, Jakovljevic M (2022) Gap analysis in manufacturing, innovation and marketing of medical devices in the Asia-Pacific region. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 22(7):1043–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shahabi S, Etemadi M, Hedayati M, Bagheri Lankarani K, Jakovljevic M (2023) Double burden of vulnerability for refugees: conceptualization and policy solutions for financial protection in Iran using systems thinking approach. Health Res Policy Syst 21(1):94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Simic R, Ratkovic N, Dragojevic Simic V et al (2021) Cost analysis of health examination screening program for ischemic heart disease in active-duty military personnel in the middle-income country. Front Public Health 9:634778

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Timofeyev Y, Dremova O, Jakovljevic M (2023) The impact of transparency constraints on the efficiency of the Russian healthcare system: systematic literature review. J Med Econ 26(1):95–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Timofeyev Y, Kaneva M, Jakovljevic M (2023) Editorial: Current questions and challenges in healthcare of the post-socialist countries. Front Public Health 11:1254898

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ahmed A, Rich MW, Fleg JL et al (2006) Effects of digoxin on morbidity and mortality in diastolic heart failure: the ancillary digitalis investigation group trial. Circulation 114(5):397–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. al BMMPECJJMe (2008) Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 359:2456–67

  56. Armstrong PW, Lam CSP, Anstrom KJ et al (2020) Effect of vericiguat vs placebo on quality of life in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the VITALITY-HFpEF randomized clinical trial. JAMA 324(15):1512–1521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Borlaug BA, Anstrom KJ, Lewis GD et al (2018) Effect of inorganic nitrite vs placebo on exercise capacity among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the INDIE-HFpEF randomized clinical trial. JAMA 320(17):1764–1773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cleland JG, Tendera M, Adamus J et al (2006) The perindopril in elderly people with chronic heart failure (PEP-CHF) study. Eur Heart J 27(19):2338–2345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Conraads VM, Metra M, Kamp O et al (2012) Effects of the long-term administration of nebivolol on the clinical symptoms, exercise capacity, and left ventricular function of patients with diastolic dysfunction: results of the ELANDD study. Eur J Heart Fail 14(2):219–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Filippatos G, Maggioni AP, Lam CSP et al (2017) Patient-reported outcomes in the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (SOCRATES-PRESERVED) study. Eur J Heart Fail 19(6):782–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Komajda M, Isnard R, Cohen-Solal A et al (2017) Effect of ivabradine in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EDIFY randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail 19(11):1495–1503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lewis GA, Dodd S, Clayton D et al (2021) Pirfenidone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med 27(8):1477–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Nassif ME, Windsor SL, Borlaug BA et al (2021) The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a multicenter randomized trial. Nat Med 27(11):1954–1960

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Pieske B, Maggioni AP, Lam CSP et al (2017) Vericiguat in patients with worsening chronic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: results of the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator in heart failure patients with preserved ef (SOCRATES-PRESERVED) study. Eur Heart J 38(15):1119–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Pieske B, Wachter R, Shah SJ et al (2021) Effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs standard medical therapies on plasma NT-proBNP concentration and submaximal exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the PARALLAX randomized clinical trial. JAMA 326(19):1919–1929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Pitt B, Pfeffer MA, Assmann SF et al (2014) Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 370(15):1383–1392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Redfield MM, Anstrom KJ, Levine JA et al (2015) Isosorbide mononitrate in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 373(24):2314–2324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Redfield MM, Chen HH, Borlaug BA et al (2013) Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on exercise capacity and clinical status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 309(12):1268–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Shah SJ, Voors AA, McMurray JJV et al (2019) Effect of neladenoson bialanate on exercise capacity among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(21):2101–2112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Anand IS et al (2019) Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 381(17):1609–1620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Solomon SD, Zile M, Pieske B et al (2012) The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 380(9851):1387–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. al FERWAGSe (2013) Effect of spironolactone on diastolic function and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction the aldo-dhf randomized controlled trial. JAMA 309(8):781–91

  73. Udelson JE, Lewis GD, Shah SJ et al (2020) Effect of praliciguat on peak rate of oxygen consumption in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the CAPACITY HFpEF randomized clinical trial. JAMA 324(15):1522–1531

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. van Veldhuisen DJ, McMurray JJ (2013) Pharmacological treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a glimpse of light at the end of the tunnel? Eur J Heart Fail 15(1):5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K et al (2003) Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-preserved trial. The Lancet 362(9386):777–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Hangzhou Medical and Health Technology Project (Number Z20210019), Hangzhou Medical and Health Science and Technology Project (No. OO20190131), and Hangzhou Science and Technology Development Plan (Number 20201203B178).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XL: data extraction, statistical analysis, risk of bias, manuscript preparation. SW: generated the idea, data extraction, statistical analysis, risk of bias, manuscript preparation. GW: revise manuscript. JH: generated the idea, data extraction, statistical analysis, risk of bias, manuscript preparation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuai Wang or Jinyu Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2305 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, X., Wu, G., Wang, S. et al. The prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev 29, 405–416 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-023-10362-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-023-10362-x

Keywords