Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model Organisms Unbound

  • Historiographical Essay
  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. For an exploration of the “model systems” approach beyond biology, see Creager et al. (2007).

  2. As an example of empathic, imaginative scholarship, I recommend Nicole Nelson and Kaitlin Stack Whitney’s “Becoming a Research Rodent” (Nelson and Whitney 2018).

References

  • Ankeny, Rachel A. 2001. The Natural History of Caenorhabditis elegans Research. Nature Reviews Genetics 2 (6): 474–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ankeny, Rachel A. 2010. Historiographic Reflections on Model Organisms: Or How the Mureaucracy May Be Limiting Our Understanding of Contemporary Genetics and Genomics. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32 (1): 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankeny, Rachel A., and Sabina Leonelli. 2019. Organisms in Experimental Research. In Handbook of the Historiography of Biology, vol. 1, ed. Michael R. Dietrich, Mark E. Borrello, and Oren Harman, 265–289. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankeny, Rachel A., and Sabina Leonelli. 2020. Model Organisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker, Jessica A. 1995. Model Systems in Developmental Biology. BioEssays 17 (5): 451–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, Christophe. 2016. Pure Lines as Industrial Simulacra: A Cultural History of Genetics from Darwin to Johannsen. In Heredity Explored: Between Public Domain and Experimental Science, 1850–1930, ed. Staffan Müller-Wille and Christina Brandt, 213–242. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele. 1998. Disciplining Reproduction Modernity, American Life Sciences, and “the Problems of Sex.” Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E., and Joan H. Fujimura, eds. 1992. The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clause, Bonnie Tocher. 1993. The Wistar Rat as a Right Choice: Establishing Mammalian Standards and the Ideal of a Standardized Mammal. Journal of the History of Biology 26 (2): 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela N. H. 2002. The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930–1965. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela N. H., and William Chester Jordan, eds. 2002. The Animal-Human Boundary: Historical Perspectives. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela N. H., Elizabeth Lunbeck, and M. Norton Wise, eds. 2007. Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew, and Perry Williams, eds. 1992. The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, ed. 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Gregg Mitman. 2005. Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Gail F., Beth J. Greenhough, Pru Hobson-West, Robert G. W. Kirk, Ken Applebee, Laura C. Bellingan, Manuel Berdoy, et al. 2016. Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare. PLoS ONE 11 (7): e0158791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Rowland H. 2004. The Age of Model Organisms. Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (1): 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Chadarevian, Soraya. 1998. Of Worms and Programmes: Caenorhabditis elegans and the Study of Development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29 (1): 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R., Rachel A. Ankeny, and Patrick M. Chen. 2014. Publication Trends in Model Organism Research. Genetics 198 (3): 787–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endersby, Jim. 2007. A Guinea Pig’s History of Biology: The Plants and Animals Who Taught Us the Facts of Life. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foer, Jonathan Safran. 2009. Eating Animals. New York: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friese, Carrie. 2013. Cloning Wild Life: Zoos, Captivity, and the Future of Endangered Animals. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, Carrie, and Joanna Latimer. 2019. Entanglements in Health and Well-Being: Working with Model Organisms in Biomedicine and Bioscience. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 33 (1): 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, Joan H. 1996. Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, Jean-Paul., and Ilana Löwy, eds. 1998. The Invisible Industrialist: Manufactures and the Production of Scientific Knowledge. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geison, Gerald L. 1995. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geison, Gerald L., and Manfred D. Laubichler. 2001. The Varied Lives of Organisms: Variation in the Historiography of the Biological Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Scott. 2009. The Adequacy of Model Systems for Evo-Devo: Modeling the Formation of Organisms/Modeling the Formation of Society. In Mapping the Future of Biology: Evolving Concepts and Theories, ed. Robert S. Cohen, Michel Morange, Anouk Barberousse, Thomas Pradeu, Jürgen. Renn, and Kostas Gavroglu, 155–169. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradmann, Christoph. 2003. Experimental Life and Experimental Disease: The Role of Animal Experiments in Robert Koch’s Medical Bacteriology. Futura (Stuttgart, Germany) 18 (2): 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, Mathias. 2019. Membranes to Molecular Machines: Active Matter and the Remaking of Life. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini, Anita. 2003. Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini, Anita. 2015. The Courtiers’ Anatomists: Animals and Humans in Louis XIV’s Paris. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 1984. Teddy Bear Patriarchy: Taxidermy in the Garden of Eden, New York City, 1908–1936. Social Text 11 (11): 20–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Frederic L. 1993. The Old Martyr of Science: The Frog in Experimental Physiology. Journal of the History of Biology 26 (2): 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, Nick. 2005. Visual Standards and Disciplinary Change: Normal Plates, Tables and Stages in Embryology. History of Science 43 (3): 239–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Ann. 2008. What If We Wrote the History of Science from the Perspective of Applied Science? Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 38 (4): 610–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Kathryn Maxson. 2020. Francis O. Schmitt: At the Intersection of Neuroscience and Squid. In Why Study Biology by the Sea?, ed. Karl S. Matlin, Jane Maienschein, and Rachel A. Ankeny, 187–210. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Kathryn Maxson, Rachel A. Ankeny, and Robert Cook-Deegan. 2018. The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project. Journal of the History of Biology 51 (4): 693–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2000. The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, Robert G. W. 2010. A Brave New Animal for a Brave New World: The British Laboratory Animals Bureau and the Constitution of International Standards of Laboratory Animal Production and Use, circa 1947–1968. Isis 101 (1): 62–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1991. Systems of Production: Drosophila, Neurospora, and Biochemical Genetics. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 22 (1): 87–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, Hannah. 2006. Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, Hannah. 2013. Postindustrial Metabolism: Fat Knowledge. Public Culture 25 (3): 495–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, Muriel, and Richard M. Burian. 1993. Introduction: The Right Organism for the Job. Journal of the History of Biology 26 (2): 235–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonelli, Sabina. 2007. Growing Weed, Producing Knowledge: An Epistemic History of Arabidopsis thaliana. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (2): 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonelli, Sabina, and Rachel A. Ankeny. 2013. What Makes a Model Organism? Endeavour n.s. 37 (4): 209–212.

  • Löwy, Ilana, and Jean-Paul Gaudillière. 1998. Disciplining Cancer: Mice and the Practice of Genetic Purity. In The Invisible Industrialist: Manufactures and the Production of Scientific Knowledge, ed. Ilana Löwy and Jean-Paul Gaudillière, 209–249. London: Macmillan Press.

  • Meunier, Robert. 2012. Stages in the Development of a Model Organism as a Platform for Mechanistic Models in Developmental Biology: Zebrafish, 1970–2000. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2): 522–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milam, Erika Lorraine. 2010a. The Equally Wonderful Field: Ernst Mayr and Organismic Biology. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40 (3): 279–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milam, Erika Lorraine. 2010b. Looking for a Few Good Males: Female Choice in Evolutionary Biology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milam, Erika Lorraine. 2020. Creatures of Cain: The Hunt for Human Nature in Cold War America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, Jacques, and François Jacob. 1961. Teleonomic Mechanisms in Cellular Metabolism, Growth, and Differentiation. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 26: 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Wille, Staffan, and Christina Brandt, eds. 2016. Heredity Explored: Between Public Domain and Experimental Science, 1850–1930. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munz, Tania. 2016. Dancing Bees: Karl von Frisch and the Discovery of the Honeybee Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Michelle. 2017. The Economization of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Nicole. 2015. Model Homes for Model Organisms: Intersections of Animal Welfare and Behavioral Neuroscience Around the Environment of the Laboratory Mouse. BioSocieties 11 (1): 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Nicole C., and Kaitlin Stack Whitney. 2018. Becoming a Research Rodent. In Living with Animals: Bonds Across Species, ed. Natalie Porter, Ilana Gershon, and Yasmine Musharbash, 199–208. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O‘Brien, Robert C. 1971. Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH. Illustrated by Zena Bernstein. New York: Atheneum.

  • Pemberton, Stephen. 2004. Canine Technologies, Model Patients: The Historical Production of Hemophiliac Dogs in American Biomedicine. In Industrializing Organisms: Introducing Evolutionary History, ed. Philip Scranton and Susan R. Schrepfer, 191–213. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rader, Karen. 2004. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radick, Gregory. 2007. The Simian Tongue: The Long Debate about Animal Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1993. Experiment and Orientation: Early Systems of in vitro Protein Synthesis. Journal of the History of Biology 26 (3): 443–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg., and Staffan Müller-Wille. 2012. A Cultural History of Heredity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, Lukas, William Deringer, and Eugenia Lean, eds. 2018. Science and Capitalism: Entangled Histories. Osiris 2nd ser., vol. 33. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritvo, Harriet. 1987. The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritvo, Harriet. 2007. On the Animal Turn. Daedalus 136 (4): 118–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Alvarado, Alejandro. 2018. To Solve Old Problems, Study New Research Organisms. Developmental Biology 433 (2): 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa L. 1993. Nature’s Body: Gender and the Making of Modern Science. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. 1975. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: New York Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2019. Collecting Experiments: Making Big Data Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, Bruno J., and Soraya de Chadarevian. 2011. The Comparative and the Exemplary: Revisiting the Early History of Molecular Biology. History of Science 49 (3): 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunder Rajan, Kaushik. 2006. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Keith. 1983. Man and the Natural World: A History of the Modern Sensibility. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todes, Daniel P. 2002. Pavlov’s Physiology Factory: Experiment, Interpretation, Laboratory Enterprise. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicedo, Marga. 2013. The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Sarah A. 2012. Is It Safe? BPA and the Struggle to Define the Safety of Chemicals. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Marcel. 2007. Redesigning the Fruit Fly: The Molecularization of Drosophila. In Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives, ed. Angela N. H. Creager, Elizabeth Lunbeck, and M. Nortonwise, 23–45. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Paul S. 2005. The Experimental Animal in Victorian Britain. In Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Lorraine Datson and Gregg Mitman, 59–82. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Doogab. 2015. The Recombinant University: Genetic Engineering and the Emergence of Stanford Biotechnology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Brad Bolman for giving me the opportunity to contribute to this special issue. Kathryn Maxson Jones, Charles Kollmer, Karen Rader, Marsha Richmond, and Gina Surita offered excellent suggestions on an earlier draft, and Brooke Fitzgerald provided help editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thomas M. Siebel Professor in the History of Science, Department of History, Princeton University, Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA

    Angela N. H. Creager

Authors
  1. Angela N. H. Creager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela N. H. Creager.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Creager, A.N.H. Model Organisms Unbound. J Hist Biol 55, 21–28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09675-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09675-8

Search

Navigation