Abstract
Academic performance (i.e., grade point average) determines career entry factors as well as career success and is thus crucial for students’ future careers. Besides individual factors such as personality traits, individuals’ social embeddedness has been shown to enhance performance. Regarding academic performance, relationships to fellow students (peers), which bundle into one’s developmental network, are a valuable source of psychosocial and career support because occupying central positions within a social network provides the benefit of being able to access career-enhancing resources. Integrating individual and social-contextual factors for the purpose of examining academic performance is therefore plausible. Research results indicate that personality, especially extraversion, might predict performance through network centrality. In this study, we examined this assumption by focusing on extraversion and centrality in the peer developmental network of recently acquainted German psychology bachelor students (N = 47, 15% male). In a longitudinal design, we analyzed the impact of extraversion and centrality on students’ academic performance at the end of their studies. Results revealed that centrality (i.e., popularity) mediates the relationship of extraversion with academic performance, indicating that extraverted students (regardless of their agreeableness) are more popular among their peers, which, in turn, enhances their academic performance. That is, the likelihood of getting superior final grades depends on whether students manage to attract peers at the very beginning of their university life, which is easier for extraverts. These findings emphasize the importance of the social embeddedness of people, highlight its long-term effects on performance, and yield several implications for research and practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: a correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007.
Adler, P., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Springer series in social psychology. Action control. From cognition to behavior (1st ed., pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). What is the central feature of extraversion?: social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.245.
Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369–1397. https://doi.org/10.2307/257037.
Barthauer, L., Spurk, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2016). Women’s social capital in academia: a personal network analysis. International Review of Social Research, 6(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2016-0022.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Boud, D. (2014). Making the move to peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: learning from and with each other (pp. 1–20). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Brass, D. J. (2012). A social network perspective on industrial/organizational psychology. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 667–695). New York: Oxford University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (2007). Secondhand brokerage: evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24162082.
Burt, R. S. (2012). Network-related personality and the agency question: multirole evidence from a virtual world. American Journal of Sociology, 118(3), 543–591. https://doi.org/10.1086/667856.
Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143828.
Butts, C. T. (2016). SNA: tools for social network analysis. (version July 23, 2016). Retrieved from https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/sna/sna.pdf.
Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.003.
Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159632.
Cullen-Lester, K. L., Leroy, H., Gerbasi, A., & Nishii, L. (2016). Energy’s role in the extraversion (dis)advantage: how energy ties and task conflict help clarify the relationship between extraversion and proactive performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 1003–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2087.
Cummings, J. N., & Higgins, M. C. (2006). Relational instability at the network core: support dynamics in developmental networks. Social Networks, 28(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.003.
Dobrow, S. R., Chandler, D. E., Murphy, W. M., & Kram, K. E. (2012). A review of developmental networks: incorporating a mutuality perspective. Journal of Management, 38(1), 210–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415858.
Dougherty, T. W., Cheung, Y. H., & Florea, L. (2008). The role of personality in employee developmental networks. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810894738.
Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: a meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26(4), 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0972.
Feiler, D. C., & Kleinbaum, A. M. (2015). Popularity, similarity, and the network extraversion bias. Psychological Science, 26(5), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615569580.
Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: an integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X189118.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
Gašević, D., Zouaq, A., & Janzen, R. (2013). “Choose your classmates, your GPA is at stake!”: the association of cross-class social ties and academic performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1460–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479362.
Goodman, J. S., & Blum, T. C. (1996). Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. Journal of Management, 22(4), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200405.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Heublein, U., Ebert, J., Hutzsch, C., Isleib, S., König, R., Richter, J., & Woisch, A. (2017). Zwischen Studienerwartungen und Studienwirklichkeit. Ursachen des Studienabbruchs, beruflicher Verbleib der Studienabbrecherinnen und Studienabbrecher und Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquote an deutschen Hochschulen. [Between study expectations and study reality. Causes of study dropout, occupational fate of study dropouts and the development of the dropout rate at German universities] (HIS: Forum Hochschule 1/2011). Hannover: HIS.
Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: a developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378023.
Hommes, J., Rienties, B., de Grave, W., Bos, G., Schuwirth, L., & Scherpbier, A. (2012). Visualizing the invisible: a network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 17(5), 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9349-0.
Imose, R., & Barber, L. K. (2015). Using undergraduate grade point average as a selection tool: a synthesis of the literature. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000025.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Adams, R., Perry, D. G., Workman, K. A., Furdella, J. Q., & Egan, S. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(3), 224–251. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2002.2348.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory—versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.494827.
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.
Klein, K. J., Lim, B.-C., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952–963. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159634.
Krackardt, D. (1987). QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 9(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(87)90012-8.
Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063.
Landis, B. (2015). Personality and social networks in organizations: a review and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), S107–S121. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2004.
Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.467.
McCrae, R. R. (1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: evidence from self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.293.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1994). The stability of personality: observations and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3(6), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770693.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.
McKenzie, K., Gow, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2004). Exploring first-year academic achievement through structural equation modelling. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000168513.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667127.
Murphy, W. M., & Kram, K. E. (2010). Understanding non-work relationships in developmental networks. Career Development International, 15(7), 637–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431011094069.
Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x.
O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of -Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Extraverts have larger social network layers. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(3), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000048.
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996.
Rammstedt, B. (2007). The 10-item Big Five Inventory: norm values and investigation of sociodemographic effects based on a German population representative sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.193.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K) [Short version of the Big Five inventory]. Diagnostica, 51(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195.
Rammstedt, B., Koch, M., Borg, I., & Reitz, T. (2004). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala für dieMessung der Big-Five-Persönlichkeitsdimensionen in Umfragen [development and validation of a short scale to measure Big Five personality dimension in surveys]. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 55, 5–28.
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2016). Manual for RSiena version 4.0. (version November 5, 2016). Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffeld College Retrieved from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/siena/.
Rizzuto, T. E., LeDoux, J., & Hatala, J. P. (2009). It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know: testing a model of the relative importance of social networks to academic performance. Social Psychology of Education, 12(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9080-0.
Roberts, B. W. (2006). Personality development and organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27001-1.
Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational Psychology handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 363–389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-015.
Roth, P. L., & Clarke, R. L. (1998). Meta-analyzing the relation between grades and salary. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1621.
Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00338.
Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069452.
Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: a social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x.
Shipilov, A., Labianca, G., Kalnysh, V., & Kalnysh, Y. (2014). Network-building behavioral tendencies, range, and promotion speed. Social Networks, 39, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.006.
Smith, R. A., & Peterson, B. L. (2007). “Psst … what do you think?”: the relationship between advice prestige, type of advice, and academic performance. Communication Education, 56(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701364890.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069458.
Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office] (n.d.). Durchschnittsalter der Studienanfänger/−innen im ersten Hochschulsemester in Deutschland von 1995 bis 2015 [Average age of first-semester students in Germany from 1995 till 2015]. Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/36660/umfrage/durchschnittsalter-der-studienanfaenger-seit-1995/. Accessed 11 May 2017.
Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35(5), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004.
Sulastri, A., Handoko, M., & Janssens, J. (2015). Grade point average and biographical data in personal resumes: predictors of finding employment. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(3), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2014.996236.
Vondracek, F. W., Lerner, R. M., & Schulenberg, J. E. (1986). Career development: a life-span developmental approach. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, W.-L., Yeh, R.-S., & Hung, H.-K. (2012). Knowledge sharing and work performance: a network perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(7), 1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.7.1113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The participants signed a consent form, which informed them about confidentiality, anonymity, and data security as well as their opportunity to stop participating at any time without consequence.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thiele, L., Sauer, N.C. & Kauffeld, S. Why extraversion is not enough: the mediating role of initial peer network centrality linking personality to long-term academic performance. High Educ 76, 789–805 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0242-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0242-5