Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Broken gears: the value added of higher education on teachers’ academic achievement

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Good teachers are essential for high-quality educational systems. However, little is known about teachers’ skill formation during college. By combining two standardized tests for Colombian students, one taken at the end of senior year in high school and the other when students are near graduation from college, we test the extent to which students majoring in education relatively improve or deteriorate their skills in quantitative reasoning, native language and foreign language, in comparison with students in other programs. We find that teachers’ skills vis-à-vis those in other majors deteriorate in quantitative reasoning and foreign language, although these skills deteriorate less for those in math-oriented and foreign language-oriented programs, respectively. For native language, we do not find evidence of robust differences in relative learning mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Instructions to gain access the data can be found at ICFES: http://www2.icfes.gov.co/investigacion/acceso-a-bases-de-datos.

  2. See: http://www.icfes.gov.co/examenes/.

  3. Refer to the following link: https://sites.google.com/site/cfbalcazars/misc for information on how we classified each major in education into each of these four categories.

  4. Given that \(t_{i,1}\) is endogenous for modeling students’ skills, \(t_{i,1} \times y_{i,0}\) is also endogenous. Also remember that any valid instrument for \(t_{i,1}\) can also be used as a valid instrument for \(t_{i,1} \times y_{i,0}\).

  5. See: http://www.icfes.gov.co/resultados/.

  6. To dissipate any doubts regarding our instruments, we also compute tests for underidentification, weak identification and overidentification.

  7. See Heckman and Navarro-Lozano (2004) for a related discussion.

  8. Table 5 in the "Appendix" shows the size of the common support after adding each matching variable at a time. After controlling for the full set of observable characteristics, we are left with 61 % approximately of the teachers sample and 21 % of the other professionals sample. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests for the equality of the distributions of teachers and other professionals fail to reject the null hypothesis.

  9. The first-step estimates are in Table 6 in the "Appendix".

References

  • Aksu, M., Demir, C., Daloglu, A., Yildirim, S., & Kiraz, E. (2010). Who are the future teachers in Turkey? Characteristics of entering student teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J., & Krueger, A. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1997). Teacher pay and teacher quality. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barón, J. D., & Bonilla, L. (2011). La calidad de los maestros en Colombia: Desempeño en el examen de Estado ICFES y la probabilidad de graduarse en el área de educación. Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economía Regional 152, Banco de la República, Colombia.

  • Barón, J. D., Bonilla, L., Cardona-Sosa, L., & Ospina, M. (2013). Quénes eligen la disciplina de la educación en Colombia? Caracterización desde las pruebas Saber 11. Borradores de Economía 785, Banco de la República, Colombia.

  • Card, D. (1995). Earnings, schooling and ability revisited. Research in Labor Economics, 14, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (2001). Estimating the return to schooling: Progress on some persistent econometric problems. Econometrica, 69(5), 1127–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., Friedman, J., & Rockoff, J. (2013a). Measuring the Impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. NBER Working Papers 19423, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Chetty, R., Friedman, J., & Rockoff, J. (2013b). Measuring the Impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. NBER Working Papers 19424, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Clotfelter, T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conneely, K. & UusitaLo, R. (1997). Estimating Heterogeneous treatment effects in the Becker schooling model. Unpublished discussion paper, Princeton University Industrial Relations Section.

  • Cunha, J., & Miller, T. (2014). Measuring value-added in higher education: Possibilities and limitations in the use of administrative data. Economics of Education Review, 42, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P. (2006). Teacher supply. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2). The Netherlands: Elsevier. Chapter 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. (2011). If you pay peanuts do you get monkeys? A cross-country analysis of teacher pay and pupil performance. Economic Policy, 26(65), 5–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P., & van der Klaauw, W. (1999). The turnover of teachers: A competing risks explanation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E., Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (2004). The teacher labour market and teacher quality. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(2), 230–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, S., Maldonado, D., Perry, G., Rodríguez, C., & Saavedra, J. (2014). Tras la excelencia docente: Cómo mejorar la calidad de la educación para todos los colombianos. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Compartir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (2002). Publicly provided education. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 4). The Netherlands: Elsevier. Chapter 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Pace, R. (1995). Who chooses to teach and why? Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher quality. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2). The Netherlands: Elsevier. Chapter 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., & Navarro-Lozano, S. (2004). Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 30–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T., & Rouse, C. (1993). Labor market returns to two- and four-year colleges: Is a credit a credit and do degrees matter? NBER Working Paper 4268.

  • Klein, S. P., Kuh, G., Chun, M., Hamilton, L., & Shavelson, R. (2005). An approach to measuring cognitive outcomes across higher education institutions. Research in Higher Education, 46, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukla-Acevedo, S. (2009). Do teacher characteristics matter? New results on the effects of teacher preparation on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, O. (2011). Value-added assessment in higher education: A comparison of two methods. Higher Education, 61(4), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizala, A., & Ñopo, H. (2014). Measuring the relative pay of Latin American school teachers at the turn of the 20th century. Working Papers 2014–15, Peruvian Economic Association.

  • Ñopo, H. (2008). Matching as a tool to decompose wage gaps. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Finland: Slow and steady reform for consistently high results in strong performers and successful reforms in education, lessons from PISA for the United States. London: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podgursky, M., Monroe, R., & Watson, D. (2004). The academic quality of public school teachers: An analysis of entry and exit behavior. Economics of Education Review, 23(5), 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, J. (2009). The learning and early labor market effects of college quality: A regression discontinuity analysis. Mimeo: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, A., & Saavedra, J. (2011). Do colleges cultivate critical thinking, problem solving, writing and interpersonal skills? Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1516–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2009). Educational change in finland. In A. Hargreaves, M. Fullan, A. Lieberman, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change. The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vegas, E., & Ganimian, A. (2013). Theory and evidence on teacher policies in developed and developing Countries. IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-438.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The comments of Mariana Alfonso, Leonardo Bonilla, Fernando Fernández, Diana Hincapie, Catherine Rodríguez, Martha Schmitz and Emiliana Vegas are specially acknowledged. Daniel Alonso provided research assistance. The findings herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Inter-American Development Bank, The World Bank Group or their Boards of Directors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Felipe Balcázar.

Appendix

Appendix

See appendix of Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5 Size of common support and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests
Table 6 First-stage regressions for the decision of being a teacher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balcázar, C.F., Ñopo, H. Broken gears: the value added of higher education on teachers’ academic achievement. High Educ 72, 341–361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9960-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9960-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation