Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution and social dynamics of acknowledged research groups

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in higher education institutions characteristic of a knowledge society are strongly affecting academic life, scientists’ working conditions and the social dynamics of scientific groups. In such situations, it is important to understand the different ways in which these groups are tackling the structural dilemmas posed by the changes affecting academic and scientific cultures. To this end, a research project on Andalusian acknowledged research groups was developed whose findings are discussed here. The project emphasised the importance of the groups’ social dynamics, particularly their patterns of relationships, organizational culture, leadership configurations and social climate. The paper pays particular attention to the four cases studied in the second, qualitative, stage of the inquiry, whose disciplinary fields included ecology, fluids engineering, archaeology and neuropsychology. A conceptualisation of the main stages experienced by the groups in their evolutionary process is offered. Next, the main problems and dilemmas faced by the groups at each stage and the ways in which they confront them are depicted. In conclusion, some suggestions are provided as to how higher education institutions and administrations could successfully support the development of scientific research groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arechavala, R., & Díaz, C. (1996). El proceso de desarrollo de grupos de investigación. ANUIES. Revista de la Educación Superior, 98, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. (2008). Ethnography and audience. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present and future. Scientometrics, 54(3), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, D., & Kennedy, M. (2009). Knowledge management and effective university governance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, B., & Romagnosi, S. (2009). Reflection on the collectivization of science through research groups. Journal of Science Communication, 8(4), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, B., & Romagnosi, S. (2012). Social dynamics in scientific practices: Focus on research groups. Sociologia, 46(2), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, P., & Corley, E. A. (2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37, 900–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayol, N., & Matt, M. (2004). Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33, 1081–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnos, J. C., & Echevin, C. (1985). Towards strategic practices in basic research. Higher Education, 14, 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2011). How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32(6), 803–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2007). Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2012). Institutional culture, social interaction and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1998). ‘New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Lucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting UK policy contexts: Academic life in education departments in five English and Scottish universities. Higher Education, 54, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (1993). Individual investigators and their research groups. Minerva, 30, 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S., & Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. Glasgow: Open University Press, McGraw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornall, L., Cook, C., Daunton, L., Salisbury, J., & Thomas, B. (Eds.). (2013). Academic working lives: Experience, practice and change. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J., Bolden, R., & Petrov, G. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: What does it accomplish? Leadership, 5, 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2009). Leadership configurations. Leadership, 5, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, E. J. (2005). Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 787–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, E. J., Conz, D., Parker, J., Bashford, J., & DeLay, S. (2004). Tokamaks and turbulence: Research ensembles, policy and technoscientific work. Research Policy, 33, 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamui Sutton, M. (2008). La identidad en la conformación del ethos: El caso de un grupo científico de investigación sobre relaciones internacionales de una institución de educación superior. Estudios Sociológicos, 26(76), 87–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamui Sutton, M. (2010). Ethos en la trayectoria de dos grupos de investigación científica de ciencias básicas de la salud. Revista de la Educación Superior, 39(2), 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, F., & Mønsted, M. (2008). Research leadership as entrepreneurial organizing for research. Higher Education, 55, 651–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, S. (2002). The impact of research selectivity on academic work and identity. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J., Pettigrew, A., & Ferlie, E. (2002). The determinants of research group performance: Towards Mode 2? Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 747–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemlin, S. (2006). Creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. The influence of leadership and organizational support in universities and business companies. Scientometrics, 67(1), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49, 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D., Blasi, B., Culum, B., Dragsic, Z., Ewen, A., Horta, H., et al. (2014). The methodological illumination of a blind spot: Information and communication technology and international research team dynamics in a higher education research program. Higher Education, 67(4), 473–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H., & Lacy, T. A. (2011). How does size matter for science? Exploring the effects of research unit size on academics’ scientific productivity and information exchange behaviors. Science and Public Policy, 38(6), 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (2003). Organising the academy: New organisational forms and the future of the university. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(1), 48–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. (1994). Effects of resource concentration on research performance. Higher Education, 28, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krige, J. (1993). Some socio-historical aspects of multinational collaborations in high-energy physics at CERN between 1975 and 1985. In E. Crawford (Ed.), Denationalizing science: The contexts of international scientific practice (pp. 233–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (2013). The academic researcher role: Enhancing expectations and improved performance. Higher Education, 65(4), 525–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisyte, L., & Dee, J. R. (2012). Understanding academic work in a changing institutional environment: Faculty autonomy, productivity, and identity in Europe and the United States. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: The handbook of theory and research (pp. 123–206). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & De Boer, H. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education, 58(5), 619–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2000). Funding social science research in academia. Social Policy & Administration, 34(4), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Londoño, F. (2005). Un análisis sobre la dinámica de los grupos de investigación en Colombia. De su conformación a su supervivencia. Investigación y Desarrollo, 13(1), 184–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Sempere, M. J., Rey-Rocha, J., & Garzón-García, B. (2002). The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish university researchers in Geology. Scientometrics, 55(3), 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejía, A. (2007). Estructura organizativa de los grupos de investigación de la Universidad de Antioquia como fuente de creación de conocimiento. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 30(2), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, A. S. (2008). Theorizing research policy: A framework for higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 241–275). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). ‘Mode 2’ revisited: The production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, Ch., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. (2002). How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1994). The audit society. In A. G. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Vielba, I., & Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2012). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages. Higher Education, 64, 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reale, E., & Seeber, M. (2011). Organization response to institutional pressures in higher education: The important role of the disciplines. Higher Education, 61, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B., & Martín-Sempere, M. (2006). Scientists’ performance and consolidation of research teams in biology and biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. Scientometrics, 69(2), 183–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Rocha, J., Martín-Sempere, M., & Sebastián, J. (2008). Estructura y dinámica de los grupos de investigación. Arbor, 184(732), 743–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, T., & Moger, S. (2000). Creative leadership processes in project team development: An alternative to Tuckman’s stage model. British Journal of Management, 11(4), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seashore Louis, K., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The effects of work-group size and organizational climate. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies & the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2000). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., & Machado, M. L. (2006). Higher education leadership and management: From conflict to interdependence through strategic planning. Tertiary Education and Management, 12, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2000). Do league tables contribute to the development of a quality culture? Football and higher education compared. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travaille, A. M., & Hendriks, P. H. J. (2010). What keeps science spiralling? Unravelling the critical success factors of knowledge creation in university research. Higher Education, 59, 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2(4), 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, H. (1990). Changes in the European university: From traditional to entrepreneurial. Higher Education Quarterly, 44(2), 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R., & Gläser, J. (Eds.). (2014). Organizational transformation and scientific change: The impact of institutional restructuring on universities and intellectual innovation. Emerald: Bingley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R., Gläser, J., & Engwall, L. (Eds.). (2010). Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships on the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (2003). Commercialising higher education in the UK: The state, industry and peer review. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O. H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45, 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O. H., Lyytinen, A., & Marttila, L. (2011). Different research markets: A disciplinary perspective. Higher Education, 62, 721–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (1987). Science in a ʽsteady stateʼ. The research system in transition, SPSG. Concept paper, No 1. London: The Science Policy Support Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper is based on the research project: López-Yáñez, J. (Head) “El poder de las redes sociales. Análisis institucional de grupos científicos de excelencia”, granted by the Junta de Andalucía, Spain (2008-2012, reference: SEJ02960). The authors also acknowledge the decisive contribution made to project by the rest of the research team: Hernández, E., Murillo, P., Sánchez-Moreno, M. (Universidad de Sevilla); Rodríguez-López, J.M. (Universidad de Huelva).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teaching and School Organisation, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Sevilla, Calle Pirotecnia, s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain

    Julián López-Yáñez & Mariana Altopiedi

Authors
  1. Julián López-Yáñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariana Altopiedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julián López-Yáñez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Yáñez, J., Altopiedi, M. Evolution and social dynamics of acknowledged research groups. High Educ 70, 629–647 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9835-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9835-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation