Skip to main content
Log in

Supporting mature-aged students from a low socioeconomic background

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine mature-aged student perceptions of university support services and barriers to study. Using a mixed methods approach, interviews and focus groups were conducted with mature-aged students to identify barriers to study, knowledge and use of current student support services, and suggestions to improve upon these services. From these data and an audit of university support services, an online survey was created to examine study barriers and patterns of support service use, as well as, perceptions of proposed support services not currently offered by the university within a larger sample of mature-aged students. Analysis of survey data indicated distinct patterns of barriers and support service use according to socioeconomic status as well as other demographic factors such as, age and enrolment status. Study findings are discussed in terms of generating support services for the retention of mature-aged students of low socioeconomic status and for the retention of mature-aged students in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, L. (1999). Does HECS deter? Factors affecting university participation by low SES groups. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1999). Statistics for psychology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, R., Archer, J., & Bourke, S. (2001). A comparison of the academic experiences and achievement of university students entering by traditional and non-traditional means. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 221–234. doi:10.1080/02602930120052387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, L. B. (2001). Experimental methodology (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullity, M. (2006). Challenges in understanding and assisting mature-age students who participate in alternative entry programs. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 46(2), 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2001). For me or not for me? Fragility and risk in mature students’ decision-making. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(2), 185–203. doi:10.1111/1468-2273.00182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, J., & Dlugosz, Y. (2001). Targeting university marketing activities using student demographic and performance data. Brisbane: Data and Analysis Section University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J. F. (1999). A model of college outcomes for adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(1), 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equity Section. (2006). University equity scholarship impact survey report, 2005. Brisbane: Equity Section University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foskett, N., Roberts, D., Roberts, D., & Maringe, F. (2006). Changing fee regimes and their impact on student attitudes to higher education. Southampton, England: University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. doi:10.1177/109442819800100106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, B. (2005). Equity entry scheme, application procedure information, mid year entry 2005. Brisbane: Student Support Services University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K., & O’Riordan, C. (1998). Inequality in higher education: a study of class barriers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(4), 445–478. doi:10.1080/0142569980190401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannan, A. (2007). Student attrition and academic and social integration: Application of Tinto’s model at the University of Papua New Guinea. Higher Education, 53(2), 147–165. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-2496-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGivney, V. (1996). Staying or leaving the course: Non completion and retention of mature students in further and higher education. Leicester: The National Organisation for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, R. (2005). 2005 orientation survey report. Brisbane: Student Support Services University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. E. (1994). Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 309–325. doi:10.1080/03075079412331381900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. E. (1995). Mature students in higher education: II. An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 5–17. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C., Burns, A., & Cooney, G. (1996). Reasons for discontinuing study: The case of mature age female students with children. Higher Education, 31, 233–253. doi:10.1007/BF02390446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C., Burns, A., & Cooney, G. (1998). Motivation for return to study as a predictor of completion of degree amongst female mature students with children. Higher Education, 35, 221–239. doi:10.1023/A:1002911025252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully-Russ, E. (2005). Agency versus structure: Path dependency and choice in low-wage labor markets. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 254–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1997) Apprenticed to the academy: Mature age students entering university. QJER 13, online access.

  • Taniguchi, H., & Kaufman, G. (2005). Degree completion among nontraditional college students. Social Science Quarterly, 86(4), 912–927. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00363.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, J., McMillan, J., & Durrington, D. (1998). Differential access to higher education: The measurement of socioeconomic status, rurality and isolation. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs [DETYA].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Patricia Obst for her assistance and advice with regards to the data analysis and statistics reported in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Tones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tones, M., Fraser, J., Elder, R. et al. Supporting mature-aged students from a low socioeconomic background. High Educ 58, 505–529 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9208-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9208-y

Keywords

Navigation