Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simultaneous trend analysis for evaluating outcomes in patient-centred health monitoring services

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research aim underpinning the Healthcare@Home (HH) information system described here was to enable ‘near real time’ risk analysis for disease early detection and prevention. To this end, we are implementing a family of prototype web services to ‘push’ or ‘pull’ individual’s health-related data via an system of clinical hubs, mobile communication devices and/or dedicated home-based network computers. We are examining more efficient methods for ethical use of such data in timeline-based (i.e. ‘longitudinal’) data analysis systems. A consistent data collation infrastructure is being created for use along the ‘patient path’—accessible wherever patients happen to be. This ‘patient-centred’ infrastructure can be applied in the evaluation of disease progression risk (in the light of clinical understanding of disease processes). In this paper we describe the requirements for making multi-data trend management ‘scale-up’, together with some requirements of an ‘end-to-end’ functioning data collection system. A Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) approach is used to maximise benefits from (1) clinical evidence and (2) computational models of disease progression that can be made available elsewhere on the SOA. We discuss the implications of this so-called ‘closed loop’ approach for improving healthcare intervention outcomes, patient safety, decision support, objective measurement of service quality and in providing inputs for quantitative healthcare (predictive) modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert PS (1999) Longitudinal data analysis (repeated measures) in clinical trials. Stat Med 18:1707–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baird J, Turisco F (2005) Service-oriented architecture: a critical technology component to support consumer-driven health care. AHIP Cover 46:74 76, 78 passim

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benson T (2007) Prevention of errors and user alienation in healthcare IT integration programmes. Inform Prim Care 15:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bescos C, Schmitt D, Kass J, Garcia-Barbero M, Kantchev P (2005) Interoperability and HealthGRID. Methods Inf Med 44:190–192

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breton V, Blanquer I, Hernandez V, Jacq N, Legre Y, Olive M, Solomonides T (2007) Roadmap for a European healthgrid. Stud Health Technol Inform 126:154–163

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bucur A, Kootstra R, van Leeuwen J, Obbink H (2006) Service-oriented architecture for grid-enabling medical applications. Stud Health Technol Inform 120:55–68

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dogac A, Laleci GB, Aden T, Eichelberg M (2007) Enhancing IHE XDS for federated clinical affinity domain support. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11:213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C, Behlen FM, Biron PV, Shabo Shvo A (2006) HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Donnelly K (2006) SNOMED-CT: the advanced terminology and coding system for eHealth. Stud Health Technol Inform 121:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  10. Estrella F, Hauer T, McClatchey R, Odeh M, Rogulin D, Solomonides T (2007) Experiences of engineering grid-based medical software. Int J Med Inform 76:621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferranti JM, Musser RC, Kawamoto K, Hammond WE (2006) The clinical document architecture and the continuity of care record: a critical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hallett C (2006) Summarisation and visualisation of e-health data repositories. Part of Clinical e-Science Framework (CLEF) project. UK e-Science All-Hands Meeting 2006, available at: http://oro.open.ac.uk/5261/01/AHM06.pdf

  13. Hartswood M, Jirotka M, Procter R, Slack R, Voss A, Lloyd S (2005) Working IT out in e-Science: experiences of requirements capture in a HealthGrid project. Stud Health Technol Inform 112:198–209

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hernandez V, Blanquer I (2005) The grid as a healthcare provision tool. Methods Inf Med 44:144–148

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herveg J (2007) Does healthgrid present specific risks with regard to data protection? Stud Health Technol Inform 126:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF (2007) Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. Roadmap for national action on clinical decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laszlo_Systems (2007) Source for OpenLaszlo, an open source platform for rich Ajax application development. http://www.laszlosystems.com/ last accessed: June 2007

  18. Muller M, Frankewitsch T, Ganslandt T, Burkle T, Prokosch HU (2004) The Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) enables electronic medical records to wireless mobile computing. Medinfo 11:1448–1452

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nadkarni PM, Miller RA (2007) Service-oriented architecture in medical software: promises and perils. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:244–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olive M, Rahmouni H, Solomonides T (2007) From healthgrid to SHARE: a selective review of projects. Stud Health Technol Inform 126:306–313

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers J, Puleston C, Rector A (2006) The CLEF chronicle: transforming patient records into an E-Science resource. Part of Clinical e-Science Framework (CLEF) project. UK e-Science All-Hands Meeting 2006, available at: http://www.allhands.org.uk/2006/proceedings/papers/688.pdf

  22. Steinichen P, Turisco F (2006) Service oriented architecture: adding value to legacy IT systems. AHIP Cover 47:54 56, 58–59

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ure J, Procter R, Martone M, Porteous D et al (2007) Data integration in ehealth: a domain/disease specific roadmap. Stud Health Technol Inform 126:144–153

    Google Scholar 

  24. Various_authors (2007) Continua healthcare alliance; see http://www.continuaalliance.org Last accessed: June 2007

  25. Various_authors (2005) Diabetes Continuing Care Reference dataset (DCCR); for details see http://www.ic.nhs.uk and http://www.ic.nhs.uk/our-services/improving-data-collection-and-use/datasets Last accessed: June 2007

  26. Diabetes NSF (Wales) (2003) Standards http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/home.cfm?orgid=440 Last accessed June 2007

  27. Fifth IMA International Conference on Quantitative Modelling in the Management of Healthcare (2007) Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. http://www.ima.org.uk/Conferences last accessed June 2007

  28. HealthGrid annual conferences, e.g. http://lyon2003.healthgrid.org, http://clermont2004.healthgrid.org http://oxford2005.healthgrid.org/, http://valencia2006.healthgrid.org/ http://geneva2007.healthgrid.org, URL's last accessed. May 2007

  29. The NHS Common User Interface (CUI) Programme. Link accessed: https://www.cui.nhs.uk/Pages/NHSCommonUserInterface.aspx, 2007

  30. OMII UK (2007) The OGSA-DAI Project—details at http://www.ogsadai.org.uk/. Last accessed: June 2007

  31. Wozak F, Ammenwerth E, Breu M, Penz R, Schabetsberger T, Vogl R, Wurz M (2006) Medical data GRIDs as approach towards secure cross enterprise document sharing (based on IHE XDS). Stud Health Technol Inform 124:377–383

    Google Scholar 

  32. Evans E (2003) Domain-driven design: tackling complexity in the heart of software. Addison-Wesley

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has been funded in the Inter Enterprise Computing Theme of the UK Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)-led Technology Programme, for which we are grateful. We also acknowledge gratefully the contribution each of our industrial partners has made to this project: IBM, Zarlink Semiconductor and Smart Holograms. ECC and DRO are grateful for support by the Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care, Wales Assembly Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward C. Conley.

Additional information

To aid understanding, a concise glossary is provided for italicized technical or common ‘jargon’ terms that are not defined in the text.

Glossary of (Jargon) terms in the context of the project for non-specialists

Glossary of (Jargon) terms in the context of the project for non-specialists

Aggregate analytical framework :

A data collection system that has consistent data formats and collection policies to permit combination of data to suit an analysis task.

Algorithmic modelling of outcomes :

A method for discovering the complex dependencies of measured variables to a specified healthcare outcome.

Closed loop outcomes analysis :

a key design point of Healthcare@Home, where a high quality risk analysis step takes place prior to and following a specific intervention so to better understand effectiveness.

Composite Process Functions :

where information services are separated into small chunks which work together to support a business process.

Domain :

in the project’s context, the real-world, day-to-day activities and concerns of ‘healthcare’ (as contrasted with technical computing concerns).

Domain Knowledge Expert :

someone who has deep understanding of knowledge and its structure associated with the domain.

Domain-Driven Business Process Modelling :

A methodology that captures understanding of domain knowledge experts and other roles associated with the domain. The modelling is useful for the construction of information services that serve the needs of the domain.

Grid Technologies :

in general, the use of resources of many separate computers (working in parallel connected by a network that is usually the Internet) to solve large-scale computational problems.

HH :

Abbreviation for Healthcare@Home, the name of the research phase demonstrator project being described in this paper—see http://www.ehealthnews.eu/content/view/837/27/

Integrated Care Pathway :

in general, a multidisciplinary outline of anticipated care, placed in an appropriate timeframe, to help a patient with a specific condition or set of symptoms move progressively through a clinical experience to positive outcomes.

Inter-Enterprise Computing :

creation and use of a wide range of environments, equipment and infrastructure in a way that allows secure, appropriate sharing of knowledge and powerful computing resources. The sharing can occur over a wide area using a high bandwidth communications infrastructure (sometimes but not exclusively referred to as grids).

Interoperable :

in general the ability of systems to exchange and use information, the term is often applied to products and systems from multiple vendors that can be used together without modification or development of custom interfaces and tools.

Logical Domain Model :

in the context used here, a model created by domain stakeholders that organises functional requirements as a framework for technical implementation choices.

OGSA-DAI :

Open Grid Services Architecture—Data Access and Integration—A project conceived by the UK Database Task Force with the aim to develop middleware assisting with access and integration of data from separate sources via the grid—see http://www.ogsadai.org.uk

Portal :

In the context used here, a Web site that provides a single point of access to specific applications and information (there may be many portals created for different purposes).

Risk Monitoring :

In the Healthcare@Home context, continuous or discontinuous analysis of measured variables (e.g. blood glucose concentration) that may indicate specified outcome risk as part of a legitimate healthcare ‘trend’ service. Monitoring can be extended anywhere a telecommunications network can support the devices and applications model.

Scalability :

in general, the ability to expand a computing solution to support large numbers of users (i.e. increasing demand) without impacting performance. Scaleable services have potential for reducing cost, though this is untested.

Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) :

put simply, a concept for a software infrastructure that defines how collections of distributed information services can interact to communicate and interoperate via agreed standards. Collections of services are so-called ‘loosely-coupled’ to promote re-use of components and when combined, support complex processes.

Time Series Analysis :

an approach to identifying underlying behaviour from a timeline-based sequence of observations, e.g. sensor-derived biomedical data. TSA may forecast (predict) future values of the time series variable, but this requires that patterns of observed time series data are identified and formally described.

Web Services :

in the context used here, WS represent simple, self contained applications which perform specific functions. Web Services describe a standardized way of integrating Web-based applications using the XML, SOAP, WSDL and UDDI open standards over an Internet protocol backbone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conley, E.C., Owens, D.R., Luzio, S.L. et al. Simultaneous trend analysis for evaluating outcomes in patient-centred health monitoring services. Health Care Manage Sci 11, 152–166 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-008-9061-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-008-9061-z

Keywords

Navigation