Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accounting and reimbursement schemes for inpatient care in France

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new French case-mix system of hospital payment was adopted in 2004 for public hospitals and in March 2005 for private-for-profit hospitals. Implementing this reform requires a period of transition but the challenges ahead can already be predicted. Prices will have to change before this mode of reimbursement can have any real impact. This requires producing more detailed hospital cost data and using fine measuring tools such as the cost accounting method developed for use in this context. This article describes and analyses the main tools and methods selected to implement the new French prospective payment system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellanger MM, Mossé PR (2005) The search of the holy grail: combining decentralised planning and contracting mechanisms in the French Health Care System. Health Econ 14:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dormont B, Milcent C (2005) How to regulate heterogenous hopsitals. J Econ Manage Strategy 14(3)

  3. Cash R (2005) La tarification à l’activité : première année de mise en œuvre. Rev Econ Financ 76:209–223

    Google Scholar 

  4. Or Z (2005) Hospital payment reform in France. Health Policy Monitor 5

  5. Michelot X (2005) Hospital Financing in France, introducing case-mix based payment, Communication in ALASS conference, Palma de Majorca, April

  6. Milcent C (2005) Hospital ownership, reimbursement and mortality rates. Health Econ 14(11):1151–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dormont B, Milcent C (2004) The sources of hospital cost variability. Health Econ 13(10):927–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Pouvourville G, Comar I, Bouvier V (1994) Le paiement à la pathologie des hôpitaux : l'expérience française. Rev Epidém et Santé Publ 42:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  9. Newhouse JP (1996) Reimbursing health plans and health providers: efficiency in production versus selection. Journal of Econ Lit XXXIV:1236–1263

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fetter R, Shin, YS, JL et al (1980) Case-mix definition by diagnosis related groups. Med Care 18(2):1–53

    Google Scholar 

  11. Le Guen Y (2005) La tarification à l’activité, ppt presentation, Avril

  12. Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn DD, Becker R (1988) Resource-based relative value scale: an overview. JAMA 16:2347–2443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cnamts-Pôle Nomenclature Tarification des actes techniques de la CCAM—Coût de la pratique : méthode d’évaluation des surcoûts, (CNAMTS, Paris, 2003)

  14. Direction de l’hospitalisation et de l’organisation des soins (DHOS) (2005) circulaire N° DHOS-F-O/DSS-1A

  15. Ministère de la santé Guide méthodologique de la comptabilité analytique, BO 2004 4 Bis, N° spécial

  16. Grolier J, Pérard Y, Peyret P (2002) La comptabilité analytique hospitalière médicalisée (Editions ENSP, Rennes)

  17. Moisdon JC (1997) Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion Paris (Seli-Arslan, Paris)

  18. Cots FF, Elvira D, Casells X, Saez M (2003) Relevance of outliers cases in case mix systems and evaluation of trimming method. Health Care Mang Sci 6(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cots F, Mercade L, Casells X et al (2004) Relationship between hospital structure level and length of stay outliers—implications for hospital payment systems. Health Policy 68(2):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Crow EL, Shimizu K eds. (1988) Log-normal distributions: theory and application. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Constant E, Garin H, Bouchet C, Kholer F (1998) Differences of case-mix according to the type of hospital: methodological aspects and results. Medinfo 9(Pt 2):8874–8878

    Google Scholar 

  22. Agence technique de l’information sur l’hospitalisation (ATIH) (2005) Fiche 1à 11 Construction des tarifs

  23. Davino M (2004) Are outlier charges likely to raise CMS scrutiny? Healthc Financ Manage 58(2):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shleifer A (1985) A theory of yardstick competition. RAND J Econ 16(3):319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henriet D (2002) Tarification à la pathologie : enjeux et perspectives de l’expérimentation française, Solidarité et Santé, Hors série:21–27

  26. Delattre E, Dormont B, McClellan M, Milcent C (2002) Systèmes de tarification et évolutions de la variabilité des coûts hospitaliers en France et aux Etats-Unis, Solidarité et Santé, Hors série:39–52

  27. Leleu H, Dervaux B, Bousquet F (2005) Les enjeux d’une mesure de la productivité hospitalière dans le cadre de l’évaluation de la tarification à l’activité, DREES. Dossiers solidarités et santé 3:49–66

    Google Scholar 

  28. Inspectorate for health and social activities (IGAS) and the General Inspectorate for finance (IGF), Rapport d’enquête sur le pilotage des dépenses hospitalières, http://sophar.com/news/rapport2OIGAS-IGF (Juillet 2005).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martine M. Bellanger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellanger, M.M., Tardif, L. Accounting and reimbursement schemes for inpatient care in France. Health Care Manage Sci 9, 295–305 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-006-9097-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-006-9097-x

Keywords

Navigation