Skip to main content
Log in

A Markov Chain-Based Group Consensus Method with Unknown Parameters

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group consensus (GC) is important for generating a group solution satisfactory or acceptable to most decision-makers in a group. Its convergency usually depends on several rounds of iterations and becomes more difficult with unknown parameters because GC is usually associated with parameters. To address the GC with unknown parameters, this paper proposes a Markov chain-based GC method, in which criterion weights and expert weights are considered as parameters. Given the interval-valued assessments of decision-makers, the GC at the alternative and global levels is defined. Based on the Markov chain, a two-hierarchical randomization algorithm is designed with unknown criterion weights to determine the transition probability matrix used to generate the stable GC. To accelerate the stable GC’s convergency, criteria significantly contributing negatives to the stable GC are identified and suggestions on helping renew decision-makers’ assessments on the identified criteria are provided. On the condition that the stable GC is definitely satisfied, a GC-based two-hierarchical randomization algorithm is designed based on the Markov chain to determine the transition probability matrix for generating the stable ranking value distribution of each alternative. The proposed method is employed to analyze a development mode selection problem. It is compared with the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis and simple additive weighting methods based on the problem by calculation and principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Algorithm 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abolghasemi R, Engelstad P, Herrera-Viedma E, Yazidi A (2022) A personality-aware group recommendation system based on pairwise preferences. Inf Sci 595:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Sandmann W (2017) Multi-server tandem queue with Markovian arrival process, phase-type service times, and finite buffers. Eur J Oper Res 256(1):187–195

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Black D (1976) Partial justification of the Borda count. Public Choice 28(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd SP, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brémaud P (2001) Markov chains: Gibbs fields, Monte Carlo simulation, and queues. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao XR, Kou G, Peng Y, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2021) An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement. Inf Sci 575:499–527

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dong QX, Cooper O (2016) A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decisoin making. Eur J Oper Res 250:521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Zhao SH, Zhang HJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A self-management mechanism for noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching process. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3276–3288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du JL, Liu SF, Liu Y (2022) A limited cost consensus approach with fairness concern and its application. Eur J Oper Res 298(1):261–275

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Yang SL (2011) An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context. Eur J Oper Res 212(1):179–189

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Yang SL (2012) An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements. Eur J Oper Res 223:167–176

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Yang JB, Yang SL (2015) A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability. Eur J Oper Res 246:886–893

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Chang WJ, Xue M, Yang SL (2019) Multiple criteria group decision making with belief distributions and distributed preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 273:623–633

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gallager RG (1997) Discrete stochastic processes. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48(1):103–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irpino A, Verde R (2008) Dynamic clustering of interval data using a Wasserstein-based distance. Pattern Recogn Lett 29:1648–1658

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood CW, Corner JL (1993) The effectiveness of partial information about attribute weights for ranking alternatives in multi-attribute decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 54:456–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma R, Salminen P (2001) SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Oper Res 49(3):444–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon-Garcia A (1994) Probability and random processes for electrical engineering. Pearson Education India, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Madu CN, Kuei CH (1995) Stability analyses of group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 28(4):881–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massari GF, Giannoccaro I, Carbone G (2019) Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence. Int J Prod Econ 208:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng FY, Gong ZW, Pedrycz W, Chu JF (2023) Selfish-delimma consensus analysis for group decision making in the perspective of cooperative game theory. Eur J Oper Res 308:290–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014) MENTOR: A graphical monitoring tool of preferences evolution in large-scale group decisionmaking. Knowl-Based Syst 58:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puterman ML (2014) Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross SM (2014) Introduction to probability models. Academic Press, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfozo R (2009) Basics of applied stochastic processes. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shen HZ, Zhao JD, Huang WW (2008) Mission-critical group decision-making: solving the problem of decision preference change in group decisoin-making using Markov chain model. J Glob Inf Manag 16(2):35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Q, Wu J, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2022) A dynamic feedback mechanism with attitudinal consensus threshold for minimum adjustment cost in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(5):1287–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian ZP, Nie RX, Wang JQ, Long RY (2021) Adaptive consensus-based model for heterogeneous large-scale group decision-making: detecting and managing noncooperative behaviors. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 29(8):2209–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan SP, Wang F, Dong JY (2018) A group decision-making method considering both the group consensus and multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 466:109–128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Liu XW, Qin JD, Zhou LG (2021) Multi-criteria group decision-making for portfolio allocation with consensus reaching process under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Inf Sci 570:668–688

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH (2015) Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decis Support Syst 79:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue M, Fu C, Yang SL (2020) Group consensus reaching based on a combination of expert weight and expert reliability. Appl Math Comput 369:124902

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yazidi A, Ivanovska M, Zennaro FM, Lind PG, Herrera-Viedma E (2022) A new decision making model based on Rank Centrality for GDM with fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 297:1030–1041

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan YX, Cheng D, Zhou ZL (2021) A minimum adjustment consensus framework with compromise limits for social network group decision making under incomplete infomration. Inf Sci 549:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan YX, Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX (2023) A minimum adjustment cost consensus framework considering harmony degrees and trust propagation for social network group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Syst 53(3):1453–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha QB, Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) A personalized feedback mechanism based on bounded confidence learning to support consensus reaching in group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 51(6):3900–3910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha QB, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2022) Consensus reaching in multiple attribute group decision making: a multi-stage optimization feedback mechanism with individual bounded confidences. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(8):3333–3346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LY, Yang ZY, Li T (2023) Group decision making with incomplete interval-valued linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 647:119451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SH, Yang JC, Ding YS, Xu XH (2017) A Markov chain approximation to multi-stage interactive group decision-making method based on interval fuzzy number. Soft Comput 21:2701–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 72171066 and 72101074) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. JZ2023HGTB0275 and PA2023GDGP0043).

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, (Grant Number 72171066), Chao Fu, (Grant Number 72101074), Wenjun Chang, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, (Grant Number JZ2023HGTB0275), Wenjun Chang, (Grant Number PA2023GDGP0043).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjun Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 613 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, C., Chang, W. A Markov Chain-Based Group Consensus Method with Unknown Parameters. Group Decis Negot (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-024-09876-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-024-09876-y

Keywords

Navigation