Skip to main content
Log in

Got green? addressing environmental justice in park provision

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a pragmatic approach to assist planners in addressing racial inequities in park access. Utilizing the Los Angeles metropolitan region as an example, we used Thiessen polygons to delineate a service area for each park, and described potential park congestion or ‘pressure’ in each park service area. Results show that Latinos, African-Americans, and low-income groups in general were likely to live close to parks with higher potential park congestion. On the other hand, predominantly White, high-income areas were typically located close to parks with lower potential park congestion levels. The park service area analysis presented here facilitates the identification of areas with greater park need and provides a pragmatic way to redress existing disparities in park access. Built into a set of web-based decision support tools, the approach fosters greater community participation and empowers local stakeholders in the process of park provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agyeman, J. (2005). Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, M. T. (2000). Leisure, diversity, and social justice. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammons, D. N. (1995). Overcoming the inadequacies of performance measurement in local government: The case of libraries and leisure services. Public Administration Review, 55, 37–47. doi:10.2307/976826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, H. (2001). The Chinatown cornfields: Including environmental benefits in environmental justice struggles. Critical Planning, Summer, 5, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, H. S. (1997). Social science, social work, and surgery, teaching what students need to practice planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), 179–188. doi:10.1080/01944369708975913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health, A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 15–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, B., Bright, E., Coleman, P., & Dobson, J. (2002). LandScan: Locating people is what matters. GeoInformatics, 5(2), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 1–21. doi:AN-2007-0075.R.1.

  • Brownlow, A. (2006). An archaeology of fear and environmental change in Philadelphia. Geoforum, 37(2), 227–245. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.02.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D. (Ed.). (1993). Confronting environmental racism (voices from the grassroots). Monroe, ME: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D., Mohai, P., Saha, R., & Wright, B. (2007). Toxic wastes and race at twenty, 1987–2007. New York, NY: United Church of Christ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby, R. J., & Strong, D. E. (1997). Coping with chemicals: Blacks, Whites, planners and industrial pollution. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(4), 469–480. doi:10.1080/01944369708975940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P. A., & McDonnell, R. A. (1998). Principles of geographical information systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., Kendrick, M., & Sroaf, D. (2007). The park made of oil: Towards a historical Political ecology of the Kenneth Hahn state recreation area. Local Environment, 12(2), 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., Wolch, J., Swift, J., & Ryan, C. (2005). SAGE (systematic audit of green-space environments): Audit form and instructions. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Center for Sustainable Cities and GIS Research Laboratory. doi:10.1080/13549830601161830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. doi:10.1080/01944369608975696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. S., & Williams, D. R. (1993). Understanding the role of ethnicity in outdoor recreation experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(1), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. L., & ReVelle, C. (1976). Theoretical and computational links between the p-median, location set-covering, and the maximal covering location problem. Geographical Analysis, 8(4), 406–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavel, P. (1994). The evolution of advocacy planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(2), 146–150. doi:10.1080/01944369408975564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. A., McKenzie, T. L., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D., & Lurie, N. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 509–514. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, A., Brunsdon, C., & Green, E. (2008). Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86, 103–114. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corburn, J. (2005). Street science, community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranz, G. (1982). The politics of park design, a history of urban parks in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmann, N., Wolch, R., Joassart-Marcelli, P., Reynolds, K., & Jerrett, M. (2008). The active city: recreation programs, public health and environmental justice. Los Angeles, CA: USC Center for Sustainable Cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338. doi:10.1177/0739456X8300300109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, P., & Boyd, L. (1983). Peace and justice in planning education. Journal of Planning Education & Research, 3, 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, K. (2006). Active living and social justice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 88–99. doi:10.1080/01944360608976726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. (1974). A Paradigm for public facility location theory. Antipode, 6, 46–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1974.tb00583.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVerteuil, G. (2000). Reconsidering the legacy of urban public facility location theory in Human Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 24(1), 47–69. doi:10.1191/030913200668094045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, Z., & Hamache, H. W. (2002). Facility location, applications and theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, M. F. (1998). Getting beyond marginality and ethnicity: The challenge for race and ethnic studies in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, M. F., McGuire, F. A., Shinew, K. J., & Noe, F. P. (1994). Race, class, and leisure activity preferences: Marginality and ethnicity revisited. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(2), 158–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, B. J. (1965). Toward equality of urban opportunity. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 320–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, H. (2006). Health, equity and the built environment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(5), A290–A291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., Flores, E. S., & Pine, E. (2002). Dreams of fields: soccer, community, and equal justice. Report on sports in urban parks to the California department of parks and recreation. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Law in the Public Interest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R. & White, A. (2006). Healthy parks, schools, and communities: Mapping green access and equity for the Los Angeles region. http://www.cityprojectca.org/publications/index.html. Accessed 11 March 2007.

  • Ghaemi, P., Swift, J., Sister, C., Wilson, J. P., & Wolch, J. (2009). Design and implementation of a web-based platform to support interactive environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.20.0905.002.

  • Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Social Science Medicine, 54, 1793–1812. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnik, P. & Simms, J. (2004). Parks: How far is too far? American Planning Association. http://www.tpl.org/content_documents/cityparks_Planning_mag_article12.2004.pdf. Accessed 03 February 2007.

  • Hewko, J., Smoyer-Tomic, K. E., & Hodgson, M. J. (2002). Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: Does aggregation error mater? Environment and Planning A, 34, 1185–1206. doi:10.1068/a34171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, C. (1993). Racism and planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 451–460. doi:10.1080/01944369308975899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joassart-Marcelli, P. M., Musso, J. A., & Wolch, J. R. (2005). Fiscal consequences of concentrated poverty in a metropolitan region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 336–356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00463.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz, N., & Clavel, P. (1994). Reinventing cities: Equity planners tell their stories. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz, N., & Forester, J. (1990). Making equity planning work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, R. A. (Ed.). (1983). Recreation, park, and open space standards and guidelines. Alexandria, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, R. A. (Ed.). (1990). Recreation, park, and open space standards and guidelines. Alexandria, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, R. A. (Ed.). (1995). Recreation, park, and open space standards and guidelines. Alexandria, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. G. (1982). Love canal: Science, politics, and people. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, G., Maraj, M., & Kuan, S. C. (2001). Access, equity, and urban greenways: An exploratory investigation. Professional Geographer., 55(3), 332–346. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry, R. L., & Welch, R. E., Jr. (1974). Who gets what: Measuring the distribution of urban public services. Social Science Quarterly, 54, 700–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, W. (1981). Equity and planning for local services. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47, 447–457. doi:10.1080/01944368108976526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, W. H. (1994). If planning includes too much, maybe it should include more. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(3), 305–318. doi:10.1080/01944369408975589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maantay, J. A. (2002). Mapping environmental injustices: Pitfalls and potential of geographic information systems (GIS) in assessing environmental health and equity. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(S2), 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R., & More, T. (2002). Recreational values of public parks. The George Wright Forum, 19(2), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, P. (1978). Equal access to public services. Proceedings of the General Education Seminar, Columbia University, 7, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marianov, V., & Serra, D. (2002). Location problems in the public sector. In Z. Drzner & H. W. Hamacher (Eds.), Facility location, application and theory (pp. 119–143). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, M. (2001). The emergence of the environmental justice movement and its challenges to planning. Critical Planning, 8, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLafferty, S. (1982). Urban structure and geographical access to public services. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(3), 347–354. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01830.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J. (2002). Using geographic information systems to create and analyze statistical surfaces of population and risk for environmental justice analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 281–297. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merget, A. (1979). Equity in the distribution of municipal services. In H. J. Bryce (Ed.), Revitalizing cities (pp. 161–191). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertes, J. D., & Hall, J. R. (1995). Park, recreation, open space and greenway guidelines. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, J. T. (1996). The theory and practice of equity planning: An annotated bibliography. Journal of Planning Literature, 11, 112–126. doi:10.1177/088541229601100106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L. (1974). Efficiency and equity of optimum location models. Antipode, 6, 41–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1974.tb00582.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing Leisure, 6, 201–219. doi:10.1080/13606710110084651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, S., & Crompton, J. L. (2005). The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincetl, S. (2003). Nonprofits and park provision in Los Angeles: An exploration of the rise of governance approaches to the provision of local services. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 979–1001. doi:10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404019.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincetl, S., Wolch, J., Wilson, J., & Longcore, T. (2003). Toward a sustainable Los Angeles: A nature’s services approach. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Center for Sustainable Cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger, R. S., Sneh, Y., Phipps, T. T., & Gurvitch, R. (2005). A spatial analysis of linkages between health care expenditures, physical inactivity, obesity and recreation supply. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. L. (2006). Media standing of urban parkland movements: The case of Los Angeles’ Taylor Yard, 1985–2001. City and Community, 5(2), 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, T. W. (1998). Equity analysis of capital improvement plans using GIS: The case of the Des Moines urbanized area. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 124, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, T. W. (2001). Are planners prepared to address social justice and distributional equity? Critical Planning, Summer, 9, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2000). Tic, Toc, the game is locked and nobody else can play. Journal of Leisure Research., 32(1), 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sister, C., Wilson, J., Wolch, J., Swift, J., & Ghaemi, P. (2007). Green visions plan for 21st century Southern California: A Guide for habitat conservation, watershed health, and recreational open space. 15. Park congestion and strategies to increase park equity. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Center for Sustainable Cities and GIS Research Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoyer-Tomic, K. E., Hewko, J. N., & Hodgson, M. J. (2004). Spatial accessibility and equity of playgrounds in Edmonton, Canada. The Canadian Geographer, 48(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stodolska, M. (2000). Looking beyond the invisible: Can research on leisure of ethnic and racial minorities contribute to leisure theory? Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodolska, M., & Yi, J. (2003). Impacts of immigration on ethnic identity and leisure behavior of adolescent immigrants from Korea, Mexico, and Poland. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(1), 49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, J. G. (1971). Some comments on equity and efficiency in public facility location models. Antipode, 3(1), 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (1997). The social equity of urban service distribution: An exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado and Macon, Georgia. Urban Geography, 18(6), 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (1998). Visualizing fairness: Equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (2000). Bottom-up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E., & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30, 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant, M. A., & Cordell, H. K. (1999). Environmental justice and the spatial distribution of outdoor recreation sites: An application of geographic information systems. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitz, M. B. (1968). Toward a theory of public facility location. Papers in Regional Science Association, 21, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, A., & Morgan, J. (2008). Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S., & Addoms, D. L. (1981). Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park. Journal of Leisure Research, 13(1), 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Church of Christ Commission on Racial Justice (UCCCRJ). (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States, a national study of the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites. New York, NY: United Church of Christ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, R. O., & Strong, D. (1997). A model for teaching environmental justice in a planning curriculum. Journal of Planning and Education Research, 16, 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J., Pincelt, S., & Pulido, L. (2001). Urban nature and the nature of urbanism. In M. Dear (Ed.), From Chicago to LA: Making sense of urban theory (pp. 367–402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J., Wilson, J. P., & Fehrenbach, J. (2005). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography, 26(1), 4–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for Twenty-first Century Southern California” project, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, as part of the Foundation’s Active Living Research Program. We also thank Jason Byrne, Parisa Ghaemi, Alison Linder, Travis Longcore, Mona Seymour, and Jennifer Swift for their many contributions to this research effort. Finally, we thank Prof. Daniel Sui, the editor of GeoJournal, and an anonymous reviewer for the valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chona Sister.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sister, C., Wolch, J. & Wilson, J. Got green? addressing environmental justice in park provision. GeoJournal 75, 229–248 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9303-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9303-8

Keywords

Navigation