Further developments in J evaluation procedure for growing cracks based on LLD and CMOD data

Abstract

Laboratory testing of fracture specimens to measure resistance curves (J − Δa) have focused primarily on the unloading compliance method using a single specimen. Current estimation procedures (which form the basis of ASTM E1820 standard) employ load line displacement (LLD) records to measure fracture toughness resistance data incorporating a crack growth correction for J. An alternative method which potentially simplifies the test procedure involves the use of crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) to determine both crack growth and J. However, while the J-correction for crack growth effects adopted by ASTM standard holds true for resistance curves measured using load line displacement (LLD) data, it becomes unsuitable for J-resistance measurements based upon the specimen response defined in terms of load-crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD). Consequently, direct application of the evaluation procedure for J derived from LLD records in laboratory measurements of resistance curves using CMOD data becomes questionable. This study provides further developments of the evaluation procedure for J in cracked bodies that experience ductile crack growth based upon the eta-method and CMOD data. The introduction of a constant relationship between the plastic components of LLD (Δ _p ) and CMOD (V _p ) drives the development of a convenient crack growth correction for J with increased loading when using laboratory measurements of P-CMOD data. The methodology broadens the applicability of current standards adopting the unloading compliance technique in laboratory measurements of fracture toughness resistance data (J resistance curves). The developed J evaluation formulation for growing cracks based on CMOD data provides a viable and simpler test technique to measure crack growth resistance data for ductile materials.