Abstract
In this paper I argue that Don Ihde’s ‘postphenomenology’ may constitute a proper access to the question concerning sustainable technology and I do so in three steps. First, I lay bare how a modern framework that systematically separates facts and instruments from values, choices and responsibilities yields no space for engaged decisions and responsible action towards more sustainable societies. In a second step, I elaborate how postphenomenology’s ‘in-between’ perspective opens up the possibility of questioning science and technology as an inherent part of our human existence. Building on this, I argue how a ‘normativity of the in-between’ may be developed around the concept of ‘topical measure’ and which is grounded in the foundationless foundation of postphenomenology’s relational ontology. In a last step, I show how such a ‘topical measure’ opens up two fields of normative action vis-à-vis the question concerning sustainable technology: one critical, the other empowering. Whereas ‘topical criticism’ focuses on bringing into the open the powerful subpolitics of science and technology, the field of ‘topical responsibility’ rather aims at actively assuming responsibility in these political circles. Besides its main interest, which lies in forging a genuine and adequate way into the issue of sustainability, this paper also constitutes an entry into Ihde’s philosophical oeuvre. The question concerning sustainable technology does not only touch upon Ihde’s relational trinity human-technology-world, it also deals with the degree of normative inquiry present in Ihde’s philosophy, an issue he has been repeatedly questioned about by his interlocutors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boehm R. (2002) Topik, phaenomenologica 162. Kluwer, Den Haag
Demeritt D (2001) The Construction of Global Warming and the politics of Science. Annals of the Association of American 91: 307–337
Dreyfus H. (1972) What computers can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Harper & Row, New York
Feenberg A. (1999) Questioning technology. Routledge, London
Forman P. (2007) The primacy of science in modernity, of technology in postmodernity, and of ideology in the history of technology. History and Technology 23(1): 1–152
François K., De Sutter L. (2004) Where mathematics becomes political. Representing (non-)humans. Philosophica 74: 123–138
Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25: 735–755
Goeminne, G. (2008). On the need and (im-)possibility of a sustainability science. In Proceedings of the XXII world congress of philosophy, 2008, Seoul, Korea (in print).
Goeminne, G. (forthcoming). Once upon a time I was a nuclear physicist. What the politics of sustainability can learn from the nuclear laboratory. Perspectives on Science.
Goeminne, G., & Paredis, E. (2009). The concept of ecological debt: challenging established science-policy frameworks in the transition to sustainable development. In E. Techera (Ed.), Frontiers of environment and citizenship. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press (in print).
Goeminne, G., Kolen, F., & Paredis, E. (forthcoming). Addressing the sustainability challenge beyond the fact-value dichotomy. A call for engaged knowledge. In D. Aerts, B. D’Hooghe & N. Note (Eds.), Worldviews, science and us: Bridging knowledge and its implications for our perspectives of the world. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company (in print).
Harbers H. (1997) Technologie is politiek met andere middelen. Tijdschrift voor Wetenschap, Technologie en Samenleving 5(5): 158–161
Healy S. (2003) Epistemological pluralism and the ‘Politics of choice’. Futures 35: 689–701
Healy, S. (2004). The sustainability problematique—Reconnecting society and nature. In K. Evie, H. Cheney & F. Solomon (Eds.), Sustainability and social science roundtable proceedings (pp. 187–205). Sydney: Institute for Sustainable Futures ISF/CSIRO.
Ihde D. (1979) Technics and Praxis. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Boston, London
Ihde D. (1983) The historical-ontological priority of technology over science. In: Durbin P., Rapp F. (eds) Philosophy and technology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 235–253
Ihde D. (1990) Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Ihde D. (1991) Instrumental realism: The interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Ihde D. (1997) Why not Science Critics?. International Studies in Philosophy 29(1): 45–54
Ihde D. (2002) Bodies in Technology. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Ihde D. (2003) A Response to My Critics. Techné 7(2): 110–117
Ihde D. (2006) Forty years in the wilderness. In: Selinger E. (eds) Postphenomenology. A critical companion to Ihde. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 267–290
Ihde D. (2008a) Ironic technics. Automatic Press/VIP, Copenhagen
Ihde D. (2008b) The Corpus is not yet closed. Techné 12(2): 126–132
Ihde, D. (2008c). Postphenomenology research. Special Issue of Human Studies 31(1).
Ihde D. (2009) Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
Jasanoff S. (2004) Ordering knwoledge, ordering society. In: Jasanoff S. (eds) States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Routledge, London, pp 13–45
Kates R.W., Clark W.C., Corell R., Hall J.M., Jaeger C.C., Lowe I. et al (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292: 641–642
Latour B. (1983) Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In: Knorr-Cetina K., Mulkay M. (eds) Science observed. Sage, London
Latour B. (1993) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B. (1996) On actor network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt 47(4): 369–381
Latour B. (1998) Ein Ding ist ein Thing. Concepts and Transformations 1(2): 97–111
Latour B. (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 25–48
Paredis, E. (this volume). Transitions and the Nature of Technology.
Peschard I. (2007) Participation of the public in science: Towards a new kind of scientific practice. Human Affairs 17: 138–153
Pickering A. (1995) The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Pinch T. J., Bijker W. E. (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14: 399–441
Puech M. (2008) Homo sapiens technologicus: Philosophie de la technologie contemporaine, philosophie de la sagesse contemporaine. Le Pommier, Paris
Puech, M. (2009). Is human enhancement a sustainable agenda? In 16th biennial conference of the society for philosophy and technology, 2009, Twente, The Netherlands.
Rouse J. (2002) How scientific practices matter. Reclaiming philosophical naturalism. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rouse J. (2007) Social practices and normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37(1): 1–11
Scharff R. (2006) Ihde’s Albatross: Sticking to a ‘phenomenology’ of technoscientific experience. In: Selinger E. (eds) Postphenomenology. A critical Companion to Ihde. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 131–144
Selinger E. (2008) Normative judgement and technoscience: Nudging Ihde, again. Techné 12(2): 120–125
Shove E. (2003) Comfort, cleanliness and convenience. The social organisation of normality. Berg, Oxford/New York
Shove E., Walker G. (2007) Caution! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A 39: 763–770
Verbeek P. P. (2005) What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency and design. Penn State University Press, Penn State
Verbeek P. P. (2006) The Morality of Things: A Postphenomenological Inquiry. In: Selinger E. (eds) Postphenomenology. A Critical Companion to Ihde. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 117–128
Verbeek, P. P. (2008a). Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: A postphenomenological analysis. In D. Ihde (Ed.), Postphenomenology research. Special Issue of Human Studies, 31(1), 11–26.
Verbeek P. P. (2008) Morality in design. Design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In: Vermaas P., Kroes P., Ligth A., Moore S. (eds) Philosophy and design. From engineering to archtitecture. Springer, Dordrecht
Verbeek P.P. (2009) The moral relevance of technological artifacts. In: Sollie P., Düwell M. e.a. (eds) Evaluating new technologies. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 63–77
Weiss D. M. (2008) Human-technology-world. Techné 12(2): 110–119
Wynne B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash S., Szerszynski B., Wynne B. (eds) Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. Sage, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goeminne, G. Postphenomenology and the Politics of Sustainable Technology. Found Sci 16, 173–194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9196-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9196-5