Abstract
The validation of numerical models, for the behaviour of structures in case of fire, is crucial for the development of precise and safe design rules for members at elevated temperatures and for the application of advanced calculation methods, on part or complete building structures under fire. Recently, a new constitutive law model for stainless steel at elevated temperatures, based on a two-stage Ramberg–Osgood formulation, was proposed for inclusion in the second generation of Part 1–2 of Eurocode 3 (EC3). In order to better understand the fire behaviour of stainless steel structures and the influence of the abovementioned new constitutive law, the respective formulation was implemented in the SAFIR finite element program. In this work, after validation of that implementation against chosen benchmark tests, different numerical and experimental fire tests obtained from the literature are numerically modelled, considering axially compressed columns, beams and eccentrically loaded columns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gardner L (2019) Stability and design of stainless steel structures—review and outlook. Thin-Walled Struct 141:208–216
SCI (The Steel Construction Institute) (2017) “Design manual for structural stainless steel”, SCI publication P413, 4th edn. SCI (The Steel Construction Institute), Berkshire
Rossi B (2014) Discussion on the use of stainless steel in constructions in view of sustainability. Thin-Walled Struct 83:182–189
Baddoo NR (2008) Stainless steel in construction: a review of research, applications, challenges and opportunities. J Constr Steel Res 64(11):1199–1206
Mirambell E, Real E (2000) On the calculation of deflections in structural stainless steel beams: an experimental and numerical investigation. J Constr Steel Res 54(1):109–133
Rasmussen KJR (2003) Full-range stress–strain curves for stainless steel alloys. J Constr Steel Res 59(1):47–61
Gardner L, Ashraf M (2006) Structural design for non-linear metallic materials. Eng Struct 28(6):926–934
Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) “Description of stress–strain curves by three parameters”. Technical Note No. 902. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, D.C.
Hill HN (1944) “Determination of stress–strain relations from ‘offset’ yield strength values”, Technical Note No. 927. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, D.C.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2006) EN 1993-1-4, Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—part 1–4: general rules—supplementary rules for stainless steels, Brussels
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2005) EN 1993-1-2, Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design, Brussels
Zhao B (2002) Évaluation de la résistance au feu des éléments structuraux en acier inoxydable (in French). Construction Métallique 4:55–64
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2021) prEN 1993-1-2:2021, Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design, Brussels
Chen J, Young B (2006) Stress–strain curves for stainless steel at elevated temperatures. Eng Struct 28(2):229–239
Liang Y, Manninen T, Zhao O, Walport F, Gardner L (2019) Elevated temperature material properties of a new high-chromium austenitic stainless steel. J Constr Steel Res 152:261–273
Simo JC, Taylor RL (1986) A return mapping algorithm for plane stress elastoplasticity. Int J Numer Meth Eng 22(3):649–670
Jetteur P (1986) Implicit integration algorithm for elastoplasticity in plane stress analysis. Eng Comput 3(3):251–253
Franssen J-M, Gernay T (2017) Modeling structures in fire with SAFIR®: theoretical background and capabilities. J Struct Fire Eng 8(3):300–323
Ansys (2017) Finite element software Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, Release 18.1. https://www.ansys.com/academic/terms-and-conditions
Lopes N, Vila Real P, da Silva LS, Franssen J-M (2010) Numerical modelling of thin-walled stainless steel structural elements in case of fire. Fire Technol 46:91–108
Fan S, Ding X, Sun W, Zhang L, Liu M (2016) Experimental investigation on fire resistance of stainless steel columns with square hollow section. Thin-Walled Struct 98(Part A):196–211
Fan S, He B, Xia X, Gui H, Liu M (2016) Fire resistance of stainless steel beams with rectangular hollow section: experimental investigation. Fire Saf J 81:17–31
Tondini N, Rossi B, Franssen J-M (2013) Experimental investigation on ferritic stainless steel columns in fire. Fire Saf J 62(Part C):238–248
Uppfeldt B, Ala Outinen T, Veljkovic M (2008) A design model for stainless steel box columns in fire. J Constr Steel Res 64:1294–1301
To ECY, Young B (2008) Performance of cold-formed stainless steel tubular columns at elevated temperatures. Eng Struct 30(7):2012–2021
Gardner L, Baddoo NR (2006) Fire testing and design of stainless steel structures. J Constr Steel Res 62(6):532–543
Oksanen T (1997) “Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire” VTT research notes 1864. Espoo (Finland)
Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1998) “Computational inelasticity”, interdisciplinary applied mathematics, vol 7. Springer, New York
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2006) EN 1993-1-5, Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—part 1–5: plated structural elements, Brussels
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2008) EN 1090-2, execution of steel structures and aluminium structures—part 2: technical requirements for steel structures, Brussels
ECCS (The European Convention for Constructional Steelwork) (1984) “Ultimate limit state calculation of sway frames with rigid joints”, Publication No. 33, ECCS—Technical Committee 8—Structural Stability, Technical Working Group 8.2–System
Franssen J-M (1993) “Residual stresses in steel profiles submitted to the fire: an analogy”, 3rd CIB/W14 Workshop, “Modelling”, TNO Building and Construction Research, Rijswijk
CEA (Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives) (2015) CAST3M: code for solving partial differential equations by the FEM
Couto C, Vila Real P, Lopes N (2013) RUBY: an interface software for running a buckling analysis of SAFIR models using Cast3M, University of Aveiro
Li B, Ren FC, Tang XY (2018) The effect of strain hardening on mechanical properties of S30408 austenitic stainless steel: a fundamental research for the quality evaluation of strain strengthened pressure vessel. Mater Sci Eng 382(3):032013
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2006) EN 10219-2, cold formed welded structural hollow sections of non-alloy and fine grain steels—part 2: tolerances, dimensions and sectional properties, Brussels
Gardner L, Cruise RB (2009) Modeling of residual stresses in structural stainless steel sections. J Struct Eng ASCE 135(1):42–53
Martins AD, Gonçalves R, Camotim D (2021) Numerical simulation and design of stainless steel columns under fire conditions. Eng Struct 229:111628
Acknowledgements
This research work was performed within the framework of the project “StaSteFi – Fire design of stainless steel members”, PTDC/ECI-EGC/30655/2017, supported by the Portuguese Operational Programme “Competitividade e Internacionalização”, in its FEDER/FNR component, and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), in its State Budget component (OE). J. Pinho-da-Cruz thanks the financial support of projects UIDB/00481/2020 and UIDP/00481/2020 – FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; and CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-022083 – Centro Portugal Regional Operational Programme (Centro2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund. Carlos Couto thanks the financial support of FCT, under the Scientific Employment Stimulus – Institutional Call – CEECINST/00026/2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pinho-da-Cruz, J., Lopes, N., Vila Real, P. et al. Numerical Modelling and Benchmark Study of Fire Resistance of Stainless Steel Structural Elements. Fire Technol 58, 2949–2979 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01286-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01286-3