Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Structural Response of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 to Impact and Fire Damage

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted an extensive investigation of the collapse of World Trade Center towers (WTC 1 and WTC 2) and the WTC 7 building. This paper describes the component, subsystem, and global analyses performed for the reconstruction of the structural response of WTC buildings 1, 2, and 7 to impact and fire damage. To illustrate the component and subsystem analyses, the approach taken for simulating the performance of concrete slabs and shear stud connectors in composite floors subject to fire conditions are presented, as well as steel floor framing connections for beams and girders. The development of the global models from the component and subsystem analyses is briefly described, including the sets of input data used to bound the probable conditions of impact and fire damage. The final analysis results that were used to develop the probable collapse hypotheses, and a comparison of the results against observed events, are presented for each building. A review of research activities focused on improving understanding of structural system response to multi-floor fires following the WTC disaster is also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is a publication of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and is not subject to copyright in the United States. NIST is a nonregulatory agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. The purpose of NIST investigations was to improve the safety and structural integrity of buildings in the United States. NIST does not have the statutory authority to make findings of fault nor negligence by individuals or organizations. By law, no part of any report resulting from a NIST investigation into a building failure or from an investigation under the National Construction Safety Team Act may be used in any suit or action for damages arising out of any matter mentioned in such reports.

References

  1. McAllister TP, Sadek F, Gross JL, Averill JD, Gann RG (2012) Overview of the structural design of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7. Fire Technol (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10694-012-0285-6

  2. McAllister TP, Sadek F, Gross JL, Kirkpatrick S, MacNeill RA, Zarghamee MS, Erbay OO, Sarawit AT (2012) Structural analysis of impact damage to World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7. Fire Technol (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10694-012-0286-5

  3. Gann RG, Hamins A, McGrattan K, Nelson HE, Ohlemiller TJ, Prasad KR, Pitts WM (2012) Reconstruction of the fires and thermal environment in World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7. Fire Technol (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10694-012-0288-3

  4. Gross J, Hervey F, Izydorek M, Mammoser J, Treadway J (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: fire resistance tests of floor truss systems. NIST NCSTAR 1-6B. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

  5. Abboud N, Matthys L, Tennant D, Mould J, Levine H, King S, Ekwueme C, Jain A, Hart G (2003) Anatomy of a disaster: a structural investigation of the World Trade Center collapses. Proceedings of the third congress forensic engineering, San Diego, CA, United States, Oct 19–21 2003, pp 360–370

  6. McAllister T (ed) (2002) World trade center building performance study: data collection, preliminary observations, and recommendations. FEMA 403. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, May

  7. LaMalva KJ, Barnett JR, Dusenberry DO (2009) Failure analysis of the World Trade Center 5 building. J Fire Prot Eng 19:261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klem T (1991) Preliminary investigation report: one meridian plaza. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Routley JG, Jennings C, Chubb M (1991) High-rise office building fire: One Meridian Plaza, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, February 23, 1991, United States Fire Administration, Emmitsburg, MD

  10. Eisner H, Manning W (1991) One Meridian Plaza fire. Fire Eng 144(8), August

  11. Nelson H (1989) An engineering view of the fire at the first interstate bank building. Fire J 83(4), July/August

  12. Routley G (1988) First Interstate Bank Building Fire, Los Angeles, California, May 4, 1988, United States Fire Administration, Technical Report USFA-TR-022/May 1988, Emmitsburg, MD

  13. Powers RW (1970) One New York Plaza Fire. The New York Board of Fire Underwriters, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  14. British Steel (1999) The behavior of multi-storey steel framed buildings in fire. British Steel PLC, Sweden Technology Centre, South Yorkshire, UK

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang YC, Moore DB (1995) Steel frames in fire: analysis. Eng Struct 17(6):462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moss JM, Buchanan AH, Septro J, Wastney C, Welsh R (2004) Effect of support conditions on the fire behaviour of steel and composite beams. Fire Mater 28:159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bailey CG, Lennon T, Moore DB (1999) The behaviour of full-scale steel-framed buildings subjected to compartment fires. Struct Eng 77(8), 20 April

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gillie M, Usmani AS, Rotter JM (2002) A structural analysis of the Cardington British steel corner test. J Construct Steel Res 58(4):427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang Z, Burgess IW, Plank RJ (1999) The influence of shear connectors on the behaviour of composite steel-framed buildings in fire. J Construct Steel Res 51(3):219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gross JL, McAllister T (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: structural fire response and probable collapse sequence of the World Trade Center Towers. NIST NCSTAR 1-6. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, September

  21. Erbay OO, Sarawit AT, Zarghamee MS (2010) Modeling behavior and failure of steel connections subject to elevated temperatures. Proceedings of the 2010 structures Congress, Orlando, FL, May

  22. McAllister TP, Gann RG, Averill JD, Gross JL, Grosshandler WL, Lawson JR, McGrattan KB, Nelson HE, Pitts WM, Prasad KR, Sadek FH (2008) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: structural fire response and probable collapse sequence of world Trade Center building 7. NIST NCSTAR 1–9, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg, MD

  23. Rambo-Roddenberry MD (2002) Behavior and strength of welded stud shear connectors, dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, April 8, 2002

  24. AISC (2005) Manual of steel construction, 13th edn. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc., Chicago, IL

  25. Luecke WE, McColskey JD, McCowan CN, Banovic SW, Fields RJ, Foecke T, Siewert TA, Gayle FW (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: Mechanical properties of structural steels. NIST NCSTAR 1-3D. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

  26. MacNeill R, Kirkpatrick S, Peterson B, Bocchieri R (2008) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: global structural analysis of the response of World Trade Center building 7 to fires and debris impact damage. NIST NCSTAR 1-9A. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

  27. Stevick GR (1994) Failure of welds at elevated temperatures. Welded Research Council Bulletin 390, Welding Research Council, pp 1–39

  28. Yu L (2006) Behavior of bolted connections during and after a fire. Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Texas at Austin, August

  29. Kulak GL (2002) High strength bolts: a primer for structural engineers. Steel Design Guide Series 17, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  30. ANSYS (2007) ANSYS mechanical release 11.0. ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317

  31. Zarghamee MS, Kitane Y, Erbay ÖO, McAllister TP, Gross JL (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: global structural analysis of the response of the World Trade Center towers to impact damage and fire. NIST NCSTAR 1-6D. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

  32. Pitts WM, Butler KM, Junker V (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: visual evidence, damage estimates, and timeline analysis. NIST NCSTAR 1-5A. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

  33. Livermore 2007. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Version 971, May

  34. Lam D, El-Lobody E (2005) Behavior of headed stud shear connectors in composite beam. J Struct Eng 131(1)

  35. Gillies A, Clifton GC, Zaki R, Butterworh J (2007) Recommendations for shear connector design and detailing for interior and exterior secondary composite beams. Aust J Struct Eng 7(2)

  36. Hicks S (2007) Strength and ductility of headed stud connectors welded in modern profiled steel sheeting. Struct Eng 85(10)

  37. Pallarés L, Hajjar JF (2010) Headed steel stud anchors in composite structures: part 1. Shear. Part II. Tension and interaction. J Construct Steel Res 66(2):198–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mujagic FRU, Easterling WS (2009) Reliability assessment of composite beams. J Construct Steel Res 65

  39. Alashker Y, El-Tawil S, Sadek F (2010) Progressive collapse resistance of steel-concrete composite floors. J Struct Eng 136(10)

  40. Flint G, Usmani A, Lamont S, Torero J, Lane B (2006) Effect of fire on composite long span truss floor systems. J Construct Steel Res 62(4)

  41. Wellman EI, Varma AH, Fike R, Kodur V (2011) Experimental evaluation of thin composite floor assemblies under fire loading. J Struct Eng 137(9)

  42. Zhao B, Roosefid M (2011) Experimental and numerical investigations of steel and concrete composite floors subjected to ISO fire condition. J Struct Fire Eng 2(4)

  43. Garlock Quiel SE (2008) Plastic axial load and moment interaction curves for fire-exposed steel sections with thermal gradients. J Struct Eng 134(6)

  44. Dwaikat MMS, Kodur VKR, Quiel SE, Garlock MEM (2011) Experimental behavior of steel beam-columns subjected to fire-induced thermal gradients. J Construct Steel Res

  45. Dai XH, Wang YC, Bailey CG (2010) Numerical modeling of structural fire behavior of restrained steel beam-column assemblies using typical joint types. Eng Struct 32(8)

  46. Sarraj M, Burgess IW, Davison JB, Plank RJ (2007) Finite element modeling of steel fin plate connections in fire. Fire Safety J 42(6–7)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Al-Jabri KS, Davison JB, Burgess IW (2008) Performance of beam-to-column joints in fire—a review. Fire Safety J 43(1), 67(1):30–38

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sadek F, El-Tawil S, Lew HS (2008) Robustness of composite floor systems with shear connections: modeling, simulation, and evaluation. J Struct Eng 134(11) (1717)

  49. Block FM, Burgess IW, Davison JB, Plank RG (2007) The development of a component-based connection element for endplate connections in fire. Fire Safety J 42:498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Flint G, Usmani A, Lamont S, Lane B, Torero J (2007) Structural response of tall buildings to multiple floor fires. J Struct Eng 133(12):1719–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Usmani A, Roben C, Al-Remal A (2009) A very simple method for assessing tall building safety in major fires. Int J Steel Struct 9(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Quiel ES, Garlock MEM (2010) Parameters for modeling a high-rise steel building frame subject to fire. J Struct Fire Eng 1(2):115–134. doi:10.1260/2040-2317.1.2.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Therese P. McAllister.

Additional information

This is a publication of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and is not subject to copyright in the United States.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McAllister, T.P., Gross, J.L., Sadek, F. et al. Structural Response of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 to Impact and Fire Damage. Fire Technol 49, 709–739 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0289-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0289-2

Keywords

Navigation