Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combining ability, maternal, and reciprocal effects of elite early-maturing maize population hybrids

  • Review
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Choosing germplasm based on elite and diverse genetic sources is essential for the genetic improvement of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the agronomic and economic potential of maize population and single-cross hybrids and whether significant maternal (ME) and reciprocal effects (RE) reside in elite population hybrids for seed production purposes. Seven elite maize populations currently under recurrent selection at North Dakota State University (NDSU) [NDSCD(M-S)C11, NDSAB(MER-FS)C14, BS21(R)C7, BS22(R)C7, LEAMING(S)C4, CGL(S1-S2)C5 and CGSS(S1-S2)C5] were crossed in a diallel mating design to form 42 population hybrids, including their reciprocals. The 42 population hybrids with eight single-cross hybrids were evaluated at six U.S. North Central locations in 2005. Data collected across locations indicated that differences across genotypes were significant (P ≤ 0.05) for all traits observed, except for grain yield ear components. General combining ability (GCA) effects were on average larger than specific combining ability (SCA) effects. ME and RE were not significant for all traits, except for ear height. The large grain yield differences between macro-environments were reflected in the ranking of genotypes, with BS21(R)C7 × BS22(R)C7 being the top performer in eastern environments and CGSS(S1-S2)C5 × NDSAB(MER-FS)C14 being the top one across western environments where drought is the major limitation. The increased ethanol production and demand from maize make test weight (and grain quality), earliness, lodging resistance, and drought tolerance as important as grain yield for maintaining a sustainable maize-ethanol relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begna SH, Hamilton RI, Dwyer LM, Stewart DW, Smith DL (2000) Variability among maize hybrids differing in canopy architecture for above-ground dry matter and grain yield. Maydica 45:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Barata C, Carena MJ (2006) Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data. Euphytica 151:339–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carena MJ (2005a) Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica 141:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carena MJ (2005b) Registration of NDSAB(MER-FS)C13 maize Germplasm. Crop Sci. 45:1670–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carena MJ, Hallauer AR (2001) Response to inbred progeny selection in Leaming and Midland Yellow Dent maize populations. Maydica 46:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena MJ, Ransom J (2005) North Dakota hybrid corn performance results 2004. (66th edn.). Circular A-793 (Revised). North Dakota Agric. Exp. Station and Ext. Service

  • Carmer SG, Swanson MR (1971) Detection of differences between means: a Monte Carlo study of five pairwise multiple comparison procedures. Agron J 63:940–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles H, Schwab C, Miller L (1997) Have you checked your grain bin? Iowa State University Extension. Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham CC (1963) Estimation of genetic variances. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds)Statistical genetics and plant breeding, vol 982. NAS-NRC Publ., pp 53–94

  • Cross HZ (1983) Registration of NDSAB and NDSF maize germplasm. Crop Sci 23:1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross HZ (1984) Registration of NDSG(M)C5, NDSC(FS)C1, and NDSD(FS)C1 maize germplasm. Crop Sci 24:1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross HZ (1988 Registration of NDSCD, NDSK(FS)C1 and NDSL(FS)C1 maize germplasm. Crop Sci 28:201–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades GO, Bolanos J, Elings A, Ribaut J-M, Banziger M, Westgate ME (2000) The role and regulation of the anthesis-silking interval in maize. In: Westgate ME, Boote KJ (eds) Physiology and modeling kernel set in maize. CSSA Special Publication No. 29. CSSA, Madison, WI, pp 43–73

  • Fehr WR (1991) Principles of cultivar development, vol I. Theory and Techniques Macmillan Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AJ, Vilella F, Trapani N, Chimenti C (1982) The effects of water stress and genotype on the dynamics of pollen-shedding in maize. Field Crops Res 5:349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes HK, East EM (1911) Improvement in corn. Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 168

  • Hansen LA (1976) The inheritance of ten quantitative characteristics in sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Diss Abstr Int 37:69B

    Google Scholar 

  • Iowa State University (2001) Dent corn breeding populations for use as genetic stocks by Corn breeders. Available at http://www.ag.iastate.edu/centers/cad/cadcornpop.html. Last modified 12 May 2004

  • Leaming JS (1883) Corn and its culture. J. Steam Printing, Wilmington

    Google Scholar 

  • Melani MD, Carena MJ (2005) Alternative maize heterotic patterns for the Northern Corn. Belt Crop Sci 45:2186–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus KA, Russell WA, Guthrie WD (1989) Changes in agronomic traits associated with recurrent selection in two maize synthetics. Crop Sci 29:269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach DA, Wulff R (1987) Maternal effects in plants: evidence and ecological and evolutionary significance. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:209–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas BA, Sprague GF (1952) A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. III. General and specific combining ability and their interaction with location and years. Agron J 44:462–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 6, 4th edn., vol. 2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary

  • Schultz EF Jr (1955) Rules of thumb for determining expectations of mean squares in analysis of variance. Biometrics 11:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH (1988) Climate requirement. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 609–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague GF, Tatum LA (1942) General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J Am Soc Agron 34:923–932

    Google Scholar 

  • Subandi (1985) Selection for early silking and maturity in three populations of corn (Zea mays L.) in Bogor, Indonesia. Indonesian J Crop Sci 1:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SA (1983) Mass selection for prolificacy in corn at high and low plant densities: cycle means and genotypic variances. Diss Abstr Int 43:2414B

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyer AF, Larkins JR (1985) Selection for early flowering in corn: 10 late synthetics. Crop Sci 25:695–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Guelph (2002) Maize populations. Crop Sci. Dep., Agricultural College, Ontario, Canada. Available at http://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/research/corn_breeding/Populations2. Updated 9 Jan. 2002; verified 13 June 2005

  • Uribelarrea M, Carcova J, Otegui ME, Westgate ME (2002) Crop physiology and metabolism. pollen production, pollination dynamics, and Kernel set in maize. Crop Sci 42:1910–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap TC, Tan ST (1974) Evaluation of recurrent selection based on roguing, S1 progeny test and S1 line breeding in a sweet corn variety. Mal Ag Res 3:222–226

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the North Dakota Corn Growers Association, North Dakota Corn Council Utilization, and the USDA—Crop Diversification Program for their support of germplasm improvement. Research partly supported by a scholarship awarded to the senor author by Fulbright.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Delaware, Newark, USA

    M. B. Jumbo

  2. Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box 5051, Fargo, ND, 58105, USA

    M. J. Carena

Authors
  1. M. B. Jumbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. J. Carena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Carena.

Additional information

Part of the thesis submitted by McDonald B. Jumbo in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a MS degree at North Dakota State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jumbo, M.B., Carena, M.J. Combining ability, maternal, and reciprocal effects of elite early-maturing maize population hybrids. Euphytica 162, 325–333 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9618-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9618-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation