Abstract
Backcrossing is a trait introgression method of renewed importance in crops. The evolution of introgressed or substituted segments through backcross generations has been analyzed theoretically using simulations. In this study, the content of donor genomes, including donor segment number (DSN), donor segment length (DSL), and donor genome size (DGS), were directly analyzed in six crosses over three successive backcrosses using a set of single sequence repeat (SSR) markers covering the entire rice genome. The results of this analysis demonstrated that the average DSN in each genome was 8.39 in BC2F1, 4.13 in BC3F1, and 2.41 in BC4F1, decreasing nearly by half with each backcrossing. The average DSL was 33.43 cM (centiMorgans) in BC2F1, 29.04 cM in BC3F1, and 25.07 cM in BC4F1, display a progressive decrease slightly greater than 10% in each additional backcross generation. Meanwhile the average DGS was 280.51 cM in BC2F1, 119.97 cM in BC3F1, and 60.53 cM in BC4F1, decreasing 57.2% from BC2F1 to BC3F1 and 50.4% from BC3F1 to BC4F1. This revealed that the reduction in DGS was approximately 50% with each backcrossing. These results provide a guide for introgression or substitution of target chromosome segments from donors into recipients in backcross programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- cM:
-
centiMorgan
- DSL:
-
Donor segment length
- DSN:
-
Donor segment number
- DGS:
-
Donor genome size
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- SSR:
-
Single sequence repeat
- MAS:
-
Marker-assisted selection
- MAB:
-
Marker-assisted backcrossing
References
Ahmadi N, Albar L, Pressoir G, Pinel A, Fargette D, Ghesquiere A (2001) Genetic basis and mapping of the resistance to rice yellow mottle virus. III. Analysis of QTL efficiency in introgressed progenies confirmed the hypothesis of complementary epistasis between two resistance QTLs. Theor Appl Genet 103:1084–1092
Allard RW (1960) Principle of plant breeding. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
Bartlett MS, Haldane JBS (1935) The theory of inbreeding with forced heterozygosity. J Genet 31:327–340
Benchimol LL, de Souza CL Jr, de Souza AP (2005) Microsatellite-assisted backcross selection in maize. Genet Mol Biol 28(4):789–797
Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999) Comparison of selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing of a gene. Crop Sci 39:1295–1301
Frisch M, Melchinger AE (2001) The length of the intact donor chromosome segment around a target gene in marker-assisted backcrossing. Genetics 157:1343–1356
Fulton TM, Nelson JC, Tanksley SD (1997) Introgression and DNA marker analysis of Lycopersicon peruvianum, a wild relative of the cultivated tomato, into Lycopersicon esculentum, followed through three successive backcross generation. Theor Appl Genet 95:895–902
Hanson WD (1959) Early generation analysis of lengths of heterozygous chromosome segments around a locus held heterozygous with backcrossing or selfing. Genetics 44:833–837
He FH, Xi ZY, Zeng RZ, Talukdar A, Zhang GQ (2005) Developing single segment substitution lines (SSSLs) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using advanced backcrosses and MAS. Acta Genetica Sinica 32:825–831 (in Chinese with English abstract)
He FH, Zeng RZ, Xi ZY, Akshay T, Zhang GQ (2003) Genetic diversity of different waxy genotypes in rice. Mol Plant Breed 1:179–186 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Hillel J, Schaap T, Haberfeld A, Jeffreys AJ, Plotzky Y, Cahaner A, Lavi U (1990) DNA fingerprints applied to gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 124:783–789
Hittalmani S, Parco A, Mew T, Zeigler RS, Huang N (2000) Fine mapping and marker-assisted pyramiding of major genes for blast resistance in rice. Theor Appl Genet 100:1025–1042
Hospital F (2001) Size of donor chromosome segments around introgressed loci and reduction of linkage drag in marker-assisted backcross programs. Genetics 158:1363–1379
Hospital F (2002) Marker-assisted backcross breeding: a case-study in genotype building theory. In: Kang MS (ed) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK
Hospital F, Charcosset A (1997) Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 147:1469–1485
Hospital F, Chevalet C, Musant P (1992) Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 132:1199–1210
Hospital F, Dillmann C, Melchinger AE (1996) A general algorithm to compute multilocus genotype frequencies under various mating systems. Comput Appl Biosci 12:455–462
Jiang CJ, Mo HD (2001) Distribution of donor genome composition and its application in marker aided backcrossing. Acta Genetica Sinica 28(7):655–662
Liu GM, Li WT, Zeng RZ, Zhang GQ (2003) Development of single segment substitution lines (SSSLs) of subspecies in rice. Chinese J Rice Sci 17:201–204 (in Chinese with English abstract)
McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu YB, Lobos KB, Clare K, Walton M, Fu BY, Maghirang R, Li ZK, Xing YZ, Zhang QF, Kono I, Yano M, Fjellstrom R, DeClerck G, Schneider D, Cartinhour S, Ware D, Stein L (2002) Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res 9:199–207
Melchinger AE (1990) Use of molecular markers in breeding for oligogenic disease resistance. Plant Breed 104:1–19
Mohan M, Nair S, Bhagwat A, Krishna TG, Yano M, Bhatia CR, Sasaki T (1997) Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants. Mol Breed 3:87–103
Naveira H, Barbadilla A (1992) The theoretical distribution of lengths of intact chromosome segments around a locus held heterozygous with backcrossing in a diploid species. Genetics 130:205–209
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR (1996) Development of microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Gen Genet 252:597–607
Ribaut JM, Jiang C, Hoisington D (2002) Simulation experiments on efficiencies of gene introgression by backcrossing. Crop Sci 42:557–565
Servin B, Hospital F (2002) Optimal positioning of markers to control genetic background in marker-assisted backcrossing. J Heredity 93(3):214–217
Shen L, Courtois B, McNally KL, Robin S, Li Z (2001) Evaluation of near-isogenic lines of rice introgressed with QTLs for root depth through marker-aided selection. Theor Appl Genet 103:75–83
Stam P, Zeven AC (1981) The theoretical proportion of the donor genome in near-isogenic lines of self-fertilizers bred by backcrossing. Euphytica 30:227–238
Van Berloo R, Stam P (1998) Marker-assisted selection in an autogamous RIL population: a simulation study. Theor Appl Genet 96:147–154
Visscher PM, Haley CS, Thompson R (1996) Marker-assisted introgression in backcross breeding programs. Genetics 144:1923–1932
Xi ZY, He FH, Zeng RZ, Zhang ZM, Ding XH, Li WT, Zhang GQ (2006) Development of a wide population of chromosome single-segment substitution lines in the genetic background of an elite cultivar of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genome 49(5):476–484
Young ND, Tanksley SD (1989) Restriction fragment length polymorphism maps and the concept of graphical genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 77:95–101
Zhang GQ, Zeng RZ, Zhang ZM, Ding XH, Li WT, Liu GM, He FH, Tulukdar A, Huang CF, Xi ZY, Qin LJ, Shi JQ, Zhao FM, Feng MJ, Shan ZL, Chen L, Guo XQ, Zhu HT, Lu YG (2004) The construction of a library of single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice Genet Newslett 21:85–87
Zheng KL, Huang N, Bennett J, Khush GS (1995) PCR-based marker-assisted selection in rice breeding. In: IRRI discussion paper series. No.12. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30330370) and from the National Basic Research Program of China (2006CB101700). We would like to thank Dr. Shu-Ku Sun, De-Xian He, Chang-Jian Jiang, and Yuan-Ming Zhang for their useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Zhang-Ying Xi and Feng-Hua He contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xi, ZY., He, FH., Zeng, RZ. et al. Characterization of donor genome contents of backcross progenies detected by SSR markers in rice. Euphytica 160, 369–377 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9547-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9547-7