Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic relatedness among eastern North American blackberry cultivars based on pedigree analysis

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blackberry genetic relationships (Rubus subgenus Rubus Watson) have not been thoroughly studied. The University of Arkansas maintains one of the largest blackberry-breeding programs in the world and thus, in-depth knowledge of the cultivars released from the program and others instrumental in their lineages can aid in breeding endeavors. Pedigrees of 32 cultivars were traced to their founding clones. Genetic contribution (GC), maximum potential similarity (MPS), inbreeding coefficient, and coefficients of relationship (CR) were calculated for all genotypes. Nineteen founding clones contributed to the 32 cultivars, ranging from <1% to ∼19%. The top three founding clones for mean GC conferred nearly 50% to the 32 cultivars in this study, suggesting a somewhat narrow genetic base. Calculations for MPS ranged from complete similarity (1.00) to 0.00. Individual inbreeding coefficients ranged from 0.00 to 0.25. The coefficient of relationship was used as a method of determining genetic relatedness and ranged from 0.00 to 0.74. University of Arkansas cultivars had the highest MPS and CR in the study. This may be attributed to more generations of hybridization than the other cultivars. The MPS provided some comparable results to those of RFLP and RAPD molecular studies, but CR did not. The rather narrow genetic base of eastern North American blackberry cultivars does not create an imminent, significant concern for loss of diversity. However, more diverse germplasm should be infused for continuation of heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alice, L.A. & C.S. Campbell, 1999. Phylogeny of Rubus (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Amer J Bot 86: 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, A.J., 1983. The inbreed procedure. In: S.P. Joyner (Ed.), SUGI Supplemental Library User’s Guide, 1983 edn., pp. 121–130. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

  • Clark, J.R., 1999. The blackberry breeding program at the University of Arkansas: Thirty-plus years of progress and developments for the future. Acta Hort 505: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A., P.P. Moore, R.J. McNicol, T.M. Sjulin & L.A. Burmistrov, 1993. Genetic diversity of red raspberry varieties throughout the world. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 118: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow, G.M., 1937. Blackberry and raspberry improvement. In: Better Plants and Animals 2, pp. 496–533. USDA Yearbook of Agriculture.

  • Darrow, G.M., 1967. The cultivated raspberry and blackberry in North America—Breeding and improvement. Amer Hort Mag 46: 202–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degani, C., L.J. Rowland, J.A. Saunders, S.C. Hokanson, E.L. Ogden, A. Golan-Goldhirsh & G.J. Galleta, 2001. A comparison of genetic relationship measures in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) based on AFLPs, RAPDs, and pedigree data. Euphytica 117: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. & T.F.C. Mackay, 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th edn., Longman, Essex, England.

  • Graham, J. & R.J. McNicol, 1995. An examination of the ability of RAPD markers to determine the relationships within and between Rubus species. Theor Appl Genet 90: 1128-1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., R.J. McNicol, K. Greig & W.T.G. van de Ven, 1994. Identification of red raspberry cultivars and an assessment of their relatedness using fingerprints produced by random primers. J Hort Sci 69: 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., G.R. Squire, B. Marshall & R.E. Harrison, 1997. Spatially dependent genetic diversity within and between colonies of wild raspberry Rubus idaeus detected using RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 6: 1001–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H.K., 1990. Blackberry breeding. In: J. Janick (ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews, Vol. 8, pp. 249–312. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.

  • Hancock, J.F., Jr. & J.H. Siefker, 1982. Levels of inbreeding in highbush blueberry cultivars. HortScience 17: 363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, U.P., 1925. The small fruits of New York. J.B. Lyon Co., Albany, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, D.L., 1967. Balanced lethals and polymorphism in Rubus idaeus. Heredity 22: 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, D.L., 1972. Aberrant segregation of a gene in the raspberry and its association with effects on seed development. Heredity 29: 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewers, K.S., E.T. Stafne, J.R. Clark, C. Weber & J. Graham, 2004. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for raspberry and blackberry. HortScience 39(4): 785 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.L.A., Lima, A.A.F., Garcia, K.M., Oliveira, S. Matsuoka, H. Arizono, C.L. de Souza Jr. & A.P. de Souza, 2002. Analysis of genetic similarity detected by AFLP and coefficient of parentage among genotypes of sugar cane (Saccharum spp.). Theor Appl Genet 104: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Medina, J., J.N. Moore & R.W., McNew, 2000. A proposed model for inheritance of primocane fruiting in tetraploid erect blackberry. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 125: 217-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N.A., 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209–220.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.N., 1984. Blackberry breeding. HortScience 19: 183–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nybom, H. & H.K. Hall, 1991. Minisatellite DNA ‘fingerprints’ can distinguish Rubus cultivars and estimate their degree of relatedness. Euphytica 53: 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nybom, H., B.A. Schaal & S.H. Rogstad, 1989. DNA “fingerprints“ can distinguish cultivars of blackberries and raspberries. Acta Hort 262: 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ourecky, D.K., 1975. Brambles. In: J. Janick & J.N. Moore (Eds.), Advances in Fruit Breeding, pp. 98–129. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamfil, D., R.H. Zimmerman, S.K. Naess & H.J. Swartz, 2000. Investigation of Rubus breeding anomalies and taxonomy using RAPD analysis. Small Fruits Rev 1: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F.J., 2000. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter Publishing, Ltd., Setauket, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjulin, T.M. & A. Dale, 1987. Genetic diversity of North American strawberry cultivars. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 112: 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafne, E.T. & J.R. Clark, 2004. PediTrack—A simple pedigree program for lineage tracking. HortScience 39: 649 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafne, E.T., J.R. Clark, M.C. Pelto & J.T. Lindstrom, 2003. Discrimination of Rubus cultivars using RAPD markers and pedigree analysis. Acta Hort 626: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafne, E.T., A.L. Szalanski & J.R. Clark, 2004. Nuclear ribosomal ITS region sequences for differentiation of Rubus genotypes. J. Ark. Acad. Sci. 57: 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trople, D.D. & P.P. Moore, 1999. Taxonomic relationships in Rubus based on RAPD analysis. Acta Hort 505: 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Amer Nat 56: 330–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric T. Stafne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stafne, E., Clark, J. Genetic relatedness among eastern North American blackberry cultivars based on pedigree analysis. Euphytica 139, 95–104 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-004-2436-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-004-2436-4

Key words

Navigation