Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Natives’ and Immigrants’ Gender Preferences for Children in Germany

  • Published:
European Journal of Population Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little research has been conducted yet investigating gender preferences among immigrant parents in Western host countries. We add further empirical evidence to this sparse literature by analyzing pooled micro-census data for the years 2005–2013 from Germany. Next to updating earlier findings on the native population, we assess parental gender preferences in two large and culturally distinct groups of immigrants in Germany, namely those with Turkish and Polish origins. Our analysis indicates both daughter and son preferences in contemporary Germany and supports the notion of potentially changing gender preferences within ethnic groups over time as well as continuous differences between ethnic groups of natives and immigrants in Western societies. Whereas the observed differences between natives and immigrants suggest incomplete cultural assimilation with regard to gender- and family-related attitudes and values, they barely contribute to explaining differential fertility behaviors, as effects sizes tend to be fairly similar across groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Federal Institute for Population Research (2018)

Notes

  1. A different but related strand of literature addresses the issue of sex-selective abortions among certain immigrant groups. In an influential study, Dubuc and Coleman (2007) analyzed the sex ratios of births to India-born mothers in England and Wales, suggesting that sex-selective abortions may have taken place in Britain. Similar findings have been reported for North America (e.g., Almond et al. 2013; Almond and Sun 2017; Puri et al. 2011) and Southern Europe (Ambrosetti et al. 2015; Gavalas et al. 2015; González 2014), for example.

  2. In the eighteenth century, a large number of Germans migrated to Eastern Europe. ‘Ethnic Germans’ are individuals of German descent who lived in formerly socialist countries of Eastern Europe. According to the German concept of nationhood, which is based on the ius sanguinis (‘right of blood’), and the German expellee legislation (Bundesvertriebenengesetz), these individuals can immediately claim German citizenship, if they decide to resettle in Germany (cf. Kreyenfeld and Konietzka 2002: Sect. 2).

References

  • Almond, D., Edlund, L., & Milligan, K. (2013). Son preference and the persistence of culture: Evidence from South and East Asian immigrants to Canada. Population and Development Review,39(1), 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, D., & Sun, Y. (2017). Son-biased sex ratios in 2010 US Census and 2011–2013 US natality data. Social Science and Medicine,176, 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altindag, O. (2016). Son preference, fertility decline, and the nonmissing girls of Turkey. Demography,53(2), 541–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosetti, E., Ortensi, L. E., Castagnaro, C., & Attili, M. (2015). Sex imbalances at birth in migratory context: Evidence from Italy. GENUS,71(2–3), 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G., Hank, K., Rønsen, M., & Vikat, A. (2006). Gendering family composition: Sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries. Demography,43(2), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G., Hank, K., & Vikat, A. (2007). Understanding parental gender preferences in advanced societies: Lessons from Sweden and Finland. Demographic Research,17(6), 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bade, K. J., & Oltmer, J. (2007). Deutschland. In K. J. Bade, P. Emmer, L. Lucassen, & J. Oltmer (Eds.), Enzyklopädie Migration in Europa. Vom 17. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart (pp. 141–170). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

  • Brockmann, H. (2001). Girls preferred? Changing patterns of sex preferences in the two German states. European Sociological Review,17(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujard, M., Dorbritz, J., Herter-Eschweiler, R., & Lux, L. (2015). Das unterschätzte Potenzial hoher Fallzahlen – Stärken und Limitierungen des Mikrozensus am Beispiel von Fertiliätsanalysen. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung,27(3), 343–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carol, S. (2016). Social integration and intermarriage in Europe. Islam, partner-choices and parental influence. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carol, S., & Milewski, N. (2018). Attitudes towards abortion among the Muslim minority and non-Muslim majority in cross-national perspective: Can religiosity explain the differences? Sociology of Religion,78(4), 456–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. (2006). Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: A third demographic transition. Population and Development Review,32(3), 401–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe.(2011). Prenatal sex selection. Resolution 1829.

  • Dahl, E., Beutel, M., Brosig, B., & Hinsch, K.-D. (2003). Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: A representative survey from Germany. Human Reproduction,18(10), 2231–2234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies,40(2), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Boer, A., & Hudson, V. (2017). Patrilineality, son preference, and sex selection in South Korean and Vietnam. Population and Development Review,43(1), 119–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, C., & Koenig, M. (2013). Zwischen Säkularisierung und religiöser Reorganisation – Eine Analyse der Religiosität türkischer und polnischer Neuzuwanderer in Deutschland. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie,65(1), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubuc, S., & Coleman, D. (2007). An increase in the sex ratio of births to India-born mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for sex-selective abortion. Population and Development Review,33(2), 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Institute for Population Research. (2018). Fakten zur ausländischen Bevölkerung. https://www.bib.bund.de/DE/Fakten/Migration/Auslaendische-Bevoelkerung.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.

  • Gavalas, V., Rontos, K., & Nagapoulos, N. (2015). Sex ratio at birth in twenty-first century Greece: The role of ethnic and social groups. Journal of Biosocial Science,47(3), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review,41(2), 207–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, L. (2014). Missing girls in Spain. Barcelona GSE Working Paper Series, No. 760, pp. 1–22.

  • Hank, K. (2007). Parental gender preferences and reproductive behaviour: A review of the recent literature. Journal of Biosocial Science,39(5), 759–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hank, K., & Kohler, H.-P. (2000). Gender preferences for children in Europe: Empirical results from 17 FFS countries. Demographic Research, 2(1).

  • Hank, K., & Kohler, H.-P. (2003). Sex preferences for children revisited: New evidence from Germany. Population (English Edition),58(1), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran, S., & Broer, P. N. (2017). A profile of Germany’s refugee population. Population and Development Review,43(1), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbownik, K., & Myck, M. (2011). Mommies’ girls get dresses, daddies’ boys get toys: Gender preferences in Poland and their implications. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6232, IZA: Bonn.

  • Krapf, S., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2015). Fertility assessment with the Own-Children Method: A validation with data from the German Mikrozensus. MPIDR Technical Report 2015-003, MPIDR: Rostock.

  • Krapf, S., & Wolf, K. (2015). Persisting differences or adaptation to German fertility patterns? First and second birth behavior of the 1.5 and second generation Turkish migrants in Germany. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie,67(Supplement), 137–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreyenfeld, M., & Konietzka, D. (2002). The performance of migrants in occupational labour markets. Evidence from Aussiedler in Germany. European Societies,4(1), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., Hannemann, T., Pailhé, A., Neels, K., Krapf, S., González-Ferrer, A., et al. (2017). Fertility by birth order among the descendants of immigrants in selected European countries. Population and Development Review,43(1), 31–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2017). Constructing abortion as a social problem: “Sex selection” and the British abortion debate. Feminism & Psychology,27(1), 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillehagen, M., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2018). Immigrant mothers’ preferences for children’s sexes: A register-based study of fertility behaviour in Norway. Population Studies,72(1), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N. (2007). First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation? Demographic Research,17(29), 859–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N. (2010). Immigrant fertility in West Germany: Is there a socialization effect in transitions to second and third births? European Journal of Population,26(3), 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N. (2011). Transition to a first birth among Turkish second-generation migrants in Western Europe. Advances in Life Course Research,16(4), 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., & Begall, K. (2010). Preferences for the sex-composition of children in Europe: A multilevel examination of its effect on progression to a third child. Population Studies,64(1), 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münz, R., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Germany and its immigrants: a socio-demographic analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,24(1), 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naderi, R. (2015). Kinderzahl und Migrationshintergrund. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung,27(3), 322–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pebley, A. R., & Westoff, C. F. (1982). Women’s sex preferences in the United States: 1970 to 1975. Demography,19(2), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri, S., Adams, V., Ivey, S., & Nachtigall, R. D. (2011). “There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons”: A qualitative study of son preference and fetal sex selection among Indian immigrants in the United States. Social Science and Medicine,72(7), 1169–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, S., & Kohls, M. (2009). Reproductive behaviour of migrant women in Germany: Data, patterns and determinants. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research,7, 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • The President’s Council on Bioethics. (2003). Choosing Sex of Children. Population and Development Review,29(4), 751–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, F. F., & Morgan, S. P. (2017). Gender composition of children and the third birth in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family,77(5), 1157–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. (2016). Marriage migration versus family reunification: How does the marriage and migration history affect the timing of first and second childbirth among Turkish immigrants in Germany? European Journal of Population,32(4), 731–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Carol.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carol, S., Hank, K. Natives’ and Immigrants’ Gender Preferences for Children in Germany. Eur J Population 36, 235–246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-019-09527-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-019-09527-y

Keywords