Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social efficiency forecasting based on social sustainability practices in the service supply chain

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tries to provide a system to predict social efficiency (SOE) by relying on internal social sustainability practices (ISSPs) in the service supply chains (SCs). Because of the unclear notion of an emerging issue, this study applied the fuzzy set theory to extract the experts’ opinions and overcome the vague nature of this problem. So, the ISSPs were identified by literature review and confirmed as schedulable and budgetable practices in service SCs by the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). The extracted ISSPs and SOE were, respectively, applied in the role of inputs and output of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The data from 70 hospital SCs were collected to design the knowledge base. The proposed system would help service SC managers to foresee if they are performing in an efficient way regards to social sustainability. Also, predicting the impact of adopting different levels of social practices on SOE enables managers to make a conscious decision about prioritizing and budgeting those practices. According to the extensive literature review, the research on the relationship between social sustainability practices-performance is emerging and limited. Also, one of the most important contribution of the paper is to consider the service SCs characteristics in this issue. This paper is a preliminary effort and scientific contribution to empirically determine the relations between social practices and social efficiency, especially in service SCs, along with applying FDM and ANFIS for answering this research questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in supplementary information files of this published article.

References

  • Abbasi, M. (2017). Towards socially sustainable supply chains–themes and challenges. European Business Review, 29(3), 261–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Esmael, B., Talib, F., Faisal, M. N., & Jabeen, F. (2019). Socially responsible supply chain management in small and medium enterprises in the GCC. Social Responsibility Journal.

  • Aliakbari Nouri, F., Aghababayi, H., & Shafiei Nikabadi, M. (2023). Designing an effective blockchain-based service supply chain using integrated FANP-QFD under uncertainty. Scientia Iranica. Ahead-of-print.

  • Aliakbari Nouri, F., Nikabadi, M. S., & Olfat, L. (2019a). Developing the framework of sustainable service supply chain balanced scorecard (SSSC BSC). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 148–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliakbari Nouri, F., Nikabadi, M. S., & Olfat, L. (2019b). The role of supply chain features in the effectiveness of sustainability practices in the service supply chain: Application of fuzzy rule-based system. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 18(3), 867–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliakbari Nouri, F., Nikabadi, M. S., & Olfat, L. (2020). Sustainable service supply chain practices (SSSCPs): A framework development. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(4), 813–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzaman, C. (2014). Green supply chain modelling: Literature review. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 6(1), 16–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzaydi, Z. M., Al-Hajla, A., Nguyen, B., & Jayawardhena, C. (2018). A review of service quality and service delivery: Towards a customer co-production and customer-integration approach. Business Process Management Journal, 24(1), 295–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. H., & Zhang, G. (2014). Closed-loop supply chain network configuration by a multi-objective mathematical model. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 6(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltacioglu, T., Ada, E., Kaplan, M. D., Yurt And, O., & Cem Kaplan, Y. (2007). A new framework for service supply chains. The Service Industries Journal, 27(2), 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubicz, M. E., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D., & Carvalho, A. (2019). Incorporating social aspects in sustainable supply chains: Trends and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., & Berkol, Ç. (2011). Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 13731–13748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetinkaya, B., Cuthbertson, R., Ewer, G., Klaas-Wissing, T., Piotrowicz, W., & Tyssen, C. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Practical ideas for moving towards best practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C.-C., Lirn, T.-C., & Lin, H.-C. (2017). Indicators and evaluation model for analyzing environmental protection performance of airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 63, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. K., Nalluri, V., Lin, M. L., & Lin, C. T. (2021). Identifying Decisive socio-political sustainability barriers in the supply chain of banking sector in India: Causality analysis using ISM and MICMAC. Mathematics, 9(3), 240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croom, S., Vidal, N., Spetic, W., Marshall, D., & McCarthy, L. (2018). Impact of social sustainability orientation and supply chain practices on operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2017-0180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, D. (2017). Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1344–1362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan, H., & Cheng, H. K. (2008). The risk and information sharing of application services supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 765–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M., Tate, W. L., & Billington, C. (2004). Understanding and managing the services supply chain. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(3), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskandarpour, M., Dejax, P., Miemczyk, J., & Péton, O. (2015). Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega, 54, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, M. (2011). Conceptualizing and managing service supply chains. The Service Industries Journal, 31(11), 1809–1823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, M., & Croom, S. R. (2004). Toward the development of a supply chain management paradigm: A conceptual framework. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(1), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2014). Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Shaw, M., & Majumdar, A. (2021). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A. (2008). Special issue on logistics: New perspectives and challenges. Omega, 36(4), 505–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güneri, A. F., Ertay, T., & Yücel, A. (2011). An approach based on ANFIS input selection and modeling for supplier selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 14907–14917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendiani, S., Lev, B., & Gharehbaghi, A. (2021). Diagnosing social failures in sustainable supply chains using a modified Pythagorean fuzzy distance to ideal solution. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154, 107156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervani, A. A., Sarkis, J., & Helms, M. M. (2017). Environmental goods valuations for social sustainability: A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq, F. A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Implementing socially sustainable practices in challenging institutional contexts: Building theory from seven developing country supplier cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 415–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., & Al-Aomar, R. (2018). A model for assessing the impact of sustainable supplier selection on the performance of service supply chains. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 11(6), 366–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., Ajmal, M. M., Gunasekaran, A., & Khan, M. (2018). Exploration of social sustainability in healthcare supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 977–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., Khan, M., Ajmal, M., Sheikh, K. S., & Ahamat, A. (2019). Assessing the barriers of social sustainability in health-care supply chains: A multi-stakeholder’s perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., Khan, M., & Al-Aomar, R. (2016). A framework for supply chain sustainability in service industry with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1301–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, V., Singh, R., & Anandnarayan, A. (2012). Impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1395–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., Ajmal, M., Hussain, M., & Helo, P. (2018a). Barriers to social sustainability in the health-care industry in the UAE. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(3), 450–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., Hussain, M., Gunasekaran, A., Ajmal, M. M., & Helo, P. T. (2018b). Motivators of social sustainability in healthcare supply chains in the UAE—Stakeholder perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 14, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. A. R., Zkik, K., Belhadi, A., & Kamble, S. S. (2021). Evaluating barriers and solutions for social sustainability adoption in multi-tier supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 59(11), 3378–3397.

  • Khokhar, M., Hou, Y., Rafique, M. A., & Iqbal, W. (2020). Evaluating the social sustainability criteria of supply chain management in manufacturing industries: A role of BWM in MCDM. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 15(2).

  • Khosravi, F., & Izbirak, G. (2019). A stakeholder perspective of social sustainability measurement in healthcare supply chain management. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, M. (2010). Intelligent business process optimization for the service industry. Dissertation, University of Karlsruhe (TH).

  • Kumar, D., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: A literature review and conceptual framework. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1), 110–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J. S. L. (2015). Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: A hybrid QFD–ANP approach. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 78, 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisen Pollack, B. (2021). Green service attributes and amplifiers of the warm emotions evoked by them. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 31(4), 512–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Bai, E., Liu, L., & Wei, W. (2017). A framework of sustainable service supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda. Sustainability, 9(3), 421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., Claudy, M., & McGrath, P. (2019). Piggy in the middle: How direct customer power affects first-tier suppliers’ adoption of socially responsible procurement practices and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1081–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., Heavey, C., & McGrath, P. (2014). Environmental and social supply chain management sustainability practices: Construct development and measurement. Production Planning & Control, 26(8), 673–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Claudy, M. (2015). Going above and beyond: How sustainability culture and entrepreneurial orientation drive social sustainability supply chain practice adoption. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 434–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miemczyk, J., & Luzzini, D. (2019). Achieving triple bottom line sustainability in supply chains: The role of environmental, social and risk assessment practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(2), 238–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf, D., Stolze, H., Tate, W. L., & Ueltschy, M. (2010). Green, lean, and global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 14–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeemah, A. J., & Wong, K. Y. (2022). Positive impacts of lean manufacturing tools on sustainability aspects: a systematic review. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 1–20.

  • Nagariya, R., Kumar, D., Kumar, I., & Patel, B. S. (2021). Service only supply chain: sustainable practices for achieving higher performance and sustainable development goals. In Handbook of research on novel practices and current successes in achieving the sustainable development goals (pp. 242–258). IGI Global.

  • Nakamba, C. C., Chan, P. W., & Sharmina, M. (2017). How does social sustainability feature in studies of supply chain management? A review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 522–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information Management, 42(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orji, I. J., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Gupta, H. (2020). The critical success factors of using social media for supply chain social sustainability in the freight logistics industry. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1522–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reefke, H., & Sundaram, D. (2017). Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management–identification and evaluation. Omega, 66, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reefke, H., & Trocchi, M. (2013). Balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chains: Design and development guidelines. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(8), 805–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relich, M. (2016). A knowledge-based system for new product portfolio selection (pp. 169–187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23338-3_8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakhuja, S., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2012). Service supply chain: Potential, challenges and future research directions. Working paper, Indian Institute of Technology.

  • Sampson, S. E. (2000). Customer-supplier duality and bidirectional supply chains in service organizations. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(4), 348–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, L. W., Kleiner, B. M., McCoy, A. P., Lingard, H., Mills, T., Blismas, N., & Wakefield, R. (2015). The effect of early supplier engagement on social sustainability outcomes in project-based supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(4), 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn, G., Berlin, C., Pinzone, M., Hanisch, C., Georgoulias, K., & Lanz, M. (2019). Why social sustainability counts: The impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. A. R., Naqvi, S. A. A., Anwar, S., Shah, A. A., & Nadeem, A. M. (2022). Socio-economic impact assessment of environmental degradation in Pakistan: fresh evidence from the Markov switching equilibrium correction model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–31.

  • Shambayati, H., Nikabadi, M. S., Firouzabadi, S. M. A. K., Rahmanimanesh, M., & Saberi, S. (2022). Optimization of virtual closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty: application of IoT. Kybernetes.

  • Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2018). Corporate social sustainability in supply chains: A thematic analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 882–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torkayesh, A. E., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2021). Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. L., Li, S. X., Lin, C. W. R., & Chiu, A. S. (2022). Validating green building social sustainability indicators in China using the fuzzy delphi method. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 1–19.

  • Tseng, M. L., Lim, M. K., Wong, W. P., Chen, Y. C., & Zhan, Y. (2018). A framework for evaluating the performance of sustainable service supply chain management under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, M., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 198, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voudouris, C., Owusu, G., Dorne, R., & Lesaint, D. (2008). Service chain management-Technology innovation for the service business. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Lai, H. W. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility influence the corporate performance of the US telecommunications industry? Telecommunications Policy, 38(7), 580–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Durugbo, C. (2013). Analysing network uncertainty for industrial product-service delivery: A hybrid fuzzy approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4621–4636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. F., Chen, S. P., Lee, Y. C., & Tsai, C. T. S. (2013). Developing green management standards for restaurants: An application of green supply chain management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wallace, S. W., Shen, B., & Choi, T. M. (2015). Service supply chain management: A review of operational models. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(3), 685–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R., & Frost, S. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Asian supply chains. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weron, R. (2014). Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future. International Journal of Forecasting, 30(4), 1030–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., & Gursoy, D. (2015a). A conceptual framework of sustainable hospitality supply chain management. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 24(3), 229–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., & Gursoy, D. (2015b). Influence of sustainable hospitality supply chain management on customers’ attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 49, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yıldızbaşı, A., Öztürk, C., Efendioğlu, D., & Bulkan, S. (2021). Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: A case study of Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 4285–4320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Shafiei Nikabadi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 46 KB)

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

The steps for FDM calculations (Wang and Durugbo 2013):

  1. 1.

    The triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) were determined for index \(O_{i} = \left( {L_{i} , M_{i} ,U_{i} } \right)\) for each i-factor. Li represents the minimum value provided by the experts:

    $${\text{LC}}_{i} = \min \left( {L_{ik} } \right)$$

Mi is the geometric mean of the experts’ opinions and is determined as follows:

$$M_{i} = \left( {R_{i1} \times R_{i2} \times \cdots \times R_{ik} } \right)^{\frac{1}{k}}$$

Ui represents the maximum value provided by the experts:

$$U_{i} = \max \left( {L_{ik} } \right)$$

A fuzzy number is a special fuzzy set in which \(\tilde{A} = \left\{ {\left( {x, \mu_{A} \left( x \right),x \in R} \right)} \right\}\) that x value is in R → [0, 1]. The fuzzy number (\(\tilde{A}\)) is defined on R, so that is a TFN and the membership function can be defined as follows:

$$\mu_{A} \left( x \right) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\frac{x - L}{{M - L}},} \hfill & {x \in \left[ {L,M} \right]} \hfill \\ {\frac{U - x}{{U - M}},} \hfill & {x \in \left[ {M, U} \right]} \hfill \\ {0,} \hfill & {{\text{otherwise}}} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right..$$

In this case, L ≤ M ≤ U, L and U are the smallest and highest values, respectively, and M represents the most probability of value.

  1. 2.

    When the TFNs are set for all factors, the center of area (COA) method is used for the defuzzification and determine the Gi value:

    $$G_{i} = \frac{{\left( {U_{i} - L_{i} } \right) + \left( {M_{i} - L_{i} } \right)}}{3} + L_{i}$$
  2. 3.

    The factors are screened by determining α. The basis for screening is as follows: Factors whose Gi are greater than or equal to the threshold (α = 3.5) remain, and other factors are eliminated.

    $$\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {{\text{If}}\;G_{i} \ge \alpha \;{\text{Then}}\;{\text{select}}\;{\text{No}}.\;i\;{\text{factor}}} \hfill \\ {{\text{If}}\;G_{i} < \alpha \;{\text{Then}}\;{\text{delete}}\;{\text{No}}.\;i\;{\text{factor}}} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right.$$

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aliakbari Nouri, F., Shafiei Nikabadi, M. & Olfat, L. Social efficiency forecasting based on social sustainability practices in the service supply chain. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 14835–14858 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03221-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03221-0

Keywords

Navigation