Abstract
In the past decades, the stakeholders, due to the evident impacts of climate change, were more involved in strategic actions and informing the public opinion on climate change. However, in order to achieve ongoing and substantial public participation in climate change actions undertaken by the stakeholders, the public will need to be fully informed about the causes and effects of climate change so that a mutual relationship of trust may be established. The present study aims to investigate public perceptions of the information citizens obtain from information sources, stakeholders' share of responsibility for climate change and citizens’ degree of trust in the stakeholders which affects public participation in climate change actions. The study was conducted in Greece, where 1536 questionnaires were collected from January 2014 to June 2015. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and nonparametric statistics, as well as the MUSA method (MUlticriteria Satisfaction Analysis). The study findings indicated that the citizens do not trust adequately information sources regarding climate change and, at the same time, they perceive that the dissemination of information on climate change is limited and consider that the media which use scientific knowledge provide more objective information. Moreover, Greek citizens consider that industries, oil companies and governments contribute mostly to climate change and they were willing to participate in climate change actions carried out mainly by scientists, environmental groups, citizen groups and non-governmental organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Next, the respondents were asked which stakeholders they trusted mostly to participate in climate change actions that these stakeholders carry out (Fig. 7)
Q8_1 = Industries, Q8_2 = Oil companies, Q8_3 = People driving big-engined cars, Q8_4 = Governments, Q8_5 = Political parties, Q8_6 = Scientists and universities, Q8_7 = Media. N = 1536 Chi-Square = 3599.42 df = 6 Asymp. Sig. < 0.001
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anable, J., Lane, B., & Kelay, T. (2006). An evidence base review of public attitudes to climate change and transport behaviour. Final Report to the Department for Transport, July, London (1–227). Retrieved from http://tna.europarchive.org/20090605231654/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/climatechange/iewofpublicattitudestocl5730.pdf.
Angra, D., & Sapountzaki, K. (2019). Climate change impacts in three regions of Greece interconnections with regional public perceptions and planning policies. Venice: AESOP Annual Congress.
Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003.
Aykut, S. C., Comby, J. B., & Guillemot, H. (2012). Climate change controversies in French mass media 1990–2010. Journalism Studies, 13, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.646395.
Berkhout, F. (2010). Reconstructing boundaries and reason in the climate debate. Global Environmental Change, 20, 559–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.006.
Boehmer-Christiansen, S. (1994). Global climate protection policy: The limits of scientific advice. Part 1. Global Environmental Change, 4, 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(94)90049-3.
Bord, R. J., O’Connor, R. E., & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301.
Boykoff, M. T. (2008). Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. Climate Change, 86, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9299-3.
Boykoff, M. T. (2013). public enemy no. 1?: Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 796–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213476846.
Boykoff, M. T., & Roberts, J. T. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses. Human Development Report. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003.
Boykoff, M. T., & Yulsman, T. (2013). Political economy, media, and climate change: Sinews of modern life. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.233.
Brevini, B. (2016). The value of environmental communication research. The International Communication Gazette, 78, 684–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516655728.
Clements, B. (2012). The sociological and attitudinal bases of environmentally-related beliefs and behaviour in Britain. Environmental Politics, 21, 901–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.724215.
Corbett, J. B. (2006). Communicating nature: How we create and understand environmental messages. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Cox, R. (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication, 1, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030701333948.
Customers Satisfaction Council. (1995). Customer satisfaction assessment guide. Motorola University Press.
Diakakis, M., Priskos, G., & Skordoulis, M. (2018). Public perception of flood risk in flash flood prone areas of Eastern Mediterranean: The case of Attica Region in Greece. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.018.
Dietz, T. (2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14081–14087. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110.
Dimendo, J. F., & Doughman, P. (2007). Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren. Cambridge: MIT Press. http://books.google.gr/books?id=PXJIqCkb7YIC&lpg=PP1&hl=el&pg=PR4#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Doulton, H., & Brown, K. (2009). Ten years to prevent catastrophe?. Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change, 19, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.004.
European Commission. (2009). Special Eurobarometer: European’s attitudes towards climate change. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_322_en.pdf.
European Commission. (2019). Special Eurobarometer 490: Climate change. Report. Linguistic version. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/support/docs/report_2019_en.pdf.
Eveland, W. P., & Cooper, K. E. (2013). An integrated model of communication influence on beliefs. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 10, 14088–14095. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212742110.
Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014). The science of science communication II. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 111, 13583–13584. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414635111.
Freudenburg, W. R., & Muselli, V. (2013). Reexamining climate change debates: Scientific disagreement or scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs)? American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212458274.
Freund, R., & Wilson, W. (2003). Statistical methods. New York: Elsevier.
Grigoroudis, E., & Siskos, Y. (2002). Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00332-0.
Grigoroudis, E., & Siskos, Y. (2010). Customer satisfaction evaluation methods for measuring and implementing service quality. Management Science, 139, 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1640-2.
Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette, 73, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386739.
Hellenic Statistical Authority. (2011). Announcement on the publication of revised 2011 census tables. Piraeus: Hellenic Statistical Authority.
Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS (p. 572). Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1102702.
Jacquet-Lagreze, E., & Siskos, J. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(82)90155-2.
Jun, J. (2011). How climate change organizations utilize websites for public relations. Public Relations Review, 37, 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.04.001.
Jurin, R. R., Roush, D., & Danter, J. (2010). Environmental communication: Skills and principles for natural resource managers, scientists, and engineers, environmental communication: Skills and principles for natural resource managers, scientists, and engineers. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3987-3.
Karasmanaki, E., & Tsantopoulos, G. (2019). Exploring future scientists’ awareness about and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. Energy Policy, 131, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.032.
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., Friberg, L., & Saccenti, E. (2017). Read all about it!? Public accountability, fragmented global climate governance and the media. Climate Policy, 17, 982–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1213695.
Ladle, R. J., Jepson, P., & Whittaker, R. J. (2005). Scientists and the media: The struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 30, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801805x42036.
Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N., Project, Y., Gaddis, J., Fernandez, L., & Read, D. (2010). Americans’ knowledge of climate change, Yale project on climate change communication.
Lindenfeld, L. A., Hall, D. M., McGreavy, B., Silka, L., & Hart, D. (2012). Creating a place for environmental communication research in sustainability science. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 6, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.640702.
Liu, X., Vedlitz, A., & Alston, L. (2008). Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.002.
Lorenzoni, I., Leiserowitz, A., De Franca Doria, M., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Cross-national comparisons of image associations with “global warming” and “climate change” among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research, 9, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870600613658.
Manolas, E. I., Tampakis, S. A., & Karanikola, P. P. (2010). Climate change: The views of forestry students in a Greek university. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 67, 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2010.499208.
Marin, A., & Berkes, F. (2012). Local people’s accounts of climate change: To what extent are they influenced by the media? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.199.
Markowitz, E. M. (2012). Is climate change an ethical issue? Examining young adults’ beliefs about climate and morality. Climate Change, 114, 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0422-8.
Matis, K. (2001). Forest sampling (2nd ed.). Xanthi: Democritus University of Thrace. (in Greek).
Nisbet, M. C., & Myers, T. (2007). The polls-trends twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 444–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm031.
Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96, 1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041.
Norton, A., & Leaman, J. (2004). The day after tomorrow: Public opinion on climate change. Public Opinion, 15, 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.035.
O’Neill, S. J., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S., & Day, S. A. (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23, 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006.
Papoulis, D., Kaika, D., Bampatsou, C., & Zervas, E. (2015). Public perceptions of climate change in a period of economic crisis. Climate, 3, 715–726. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli3030715.
Pasquaré, F. A., & Oppizzi, P. (2012). How do the media affect public perception of climate change and geohazards? An Italian case study. Global and Planetary Change, 90–91, 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.05.010.
Peeples, J., & Depoe, S. (2014). Voice and environmental communication Palgrave. Studies in media and environmental communication. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Petraki, M. (2016). Climate change impacts and public perceptions: A study in Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Second cycle, A2E. Alnarp: SLU, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/719a/52aaf7f07b0e4c6e6f8c4e12d2b5939223cb.pdf.
Piperopoulos, G. P., & Tsantopoulos, G. E. (2006). The characteristics of environmental organisations in Greece in relation to employment of a public relations officer. Environmental Politics, 15(03), 454–461.
Senecah, S. L. (2004). The trinity of voice: The role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. In S. P. Depoe (Ed.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 13–33). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Shanahan, M. (2007). Talking about a revolution: climate change and the media. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/17029IIED.pdf.
Siskos, Y., & Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigação Operacional, 5, 39–53.
Sivakumar, B. (2011). Global climate change and its impacts on water resources planning and management: Assessment and challenges. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 25, 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0423-y.
Smith, J. (2005). Dangerous news: Media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Analysis, 25, 1471–1482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00693.x.
Soroka, S. N. (2003). Media, public opinion, and foreign policy. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02238783.
Toma, L., Barnes, A., Revoredo-Giha, C., Tsitsoni, V., & Glenk, K. (2014). A behavioural economics analysis of the impact of information and knowledge on CO2 capture and storage acceptance in the European Union. Procedia Economics and Finance, 14, 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00749-7.
Tsitsonia, V., & Toma, L. (2013). An econometric analysis of determinants of climate change attitudes and behaviour in Greece and Great Britain. Agricultural Economics Review, 14(1), 59–75.
Valenti, J. A. M. (1999). Commentary: How well do scientists communicate to media? Science Communication, 21, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547099021002005.
Vignola, R., Klinsky, S., Tam, J., & McDaniels, T. (2013). Public perception, knowledge and policy support for mitigation and adaption to Climate Change in Costa Rica: Comparisons with North American and European studies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9364-8.
Von Storch, H. (2009). Climate research and policy advice: Scientific and cultural constructions of knowledge. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.008.
Voskaki, A, & Tsermenidis, K. (2016). Public perception of climate risk: The case of Greece. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201608.0058.v1.
Waddell, P. (2001). Towards a behavioral integration of land use and transportation modeling. In: Proceedings of the 9th international association for travel behavior research conference, Queensland, Australia.
Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304.
Wilson, K. M. (1995). Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Communication Review, 2, 75–89.
Zerva, A., & Tsantopoulos, G. (2013). Perceptions and attitudes of the public opinion towards climate change on national and international scale. Topics on forestry and management of the environment and natural resources. International Environmental Policy: Confrontations with the Future, 5, 75–89. (in Greek).
Zerva, A., Tsantopoulos, G., Grigoroudis, E., & Arabatzis, G. (2018). Perceived citizens’ satisfaction with climate change stakeholders using a multicriteria decision analysis approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 82, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.008.
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zerva, A., Grigoroudis, E., Karasmanaki, E. et al. Multiple criteria analysis of citizens’ information and trust in climate change actions. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 7706–7727 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00942-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00942-4