Skip to main content
Log in

A happiness Kuznets curve? Using model-based cluster analysis to group countries based on happiness, development, income, and carbon emissions

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study uses model-based cluster analysis to group sixty-one countries based on statistical similarities in terms of happiness, development, income, and carbon emissions. Model-based cluster analysis is appropriate for an initial identification of a pattern that is worthy of further investigation. A key finding is that there may be a Kuznets curve for happiness. The Kuznets curve graphs the proposition that, as an economy develops, economic inequality first increases and then decreases. Similarly, the authors find that clusters of countries at the extremes of the lowest and highest average levels of development and income have the highest self-reported levels of happiness. Clusters of countries in the middle of the development and income spectrum have the comparatively lowest average levels of happiness. Further, carbon emissions are not perfectly associated with happiness. For example, between two clusters with the highest average levels of development, income, and happiness there is a 43 % difference in carbon emissions. A highly developed cluster has roughly the same mean carbon emissions as a cluster with 83 % less income, and the least developed cluster has 93 % of the happiness as the most developed cluster yet 86 % less carbon emissions. Despite limitations of both data and methodology, the overall pattern—that there may be a happiness Kuznets curve and that development, income, and carbon emissions are not associated lockstep with happiness—contributes to the literature on decoupling development from growth in emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcicky, P. (2013). Rethinking the foundations of sustainability measurement: The limitations of the environmental sustainability index (ESI). Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 133–157. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0086-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, W. (2009). Gross national happiness. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 23(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R., & Plan B 3.0, & Earth Policy Institute. (2009). Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing to save civilization (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: “our common future.”. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy? American Psychologist, 54(10), 821–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35(2), 179–200. doi:10.1007/BF01079026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43(3), 307–334. doi:10.1023/A:1006831107052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Li, L., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. (2014). A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 183–206. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9444-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2009). Environmentally efficient well-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts. Human Ecology Review, 16(1), 114–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2012). Environmentally efficient well-being: Is there a Kuznets curve? Applied Geography, 32(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmands, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmands, A. (2012). The link between job satisfaction and firm value, with implications for corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work a review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458), 611–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2006). MCLUST version 3: An R package for normal mixture modeling and model-based clustering. Seattle: Washington University Seattle Dept of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office. (2011). Key indicator systems: Experiences of other national and sub-national systems offer insights for the United States. Washington: GAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Carol. (2012). The pursuit of happiness: An economy of well-being. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundelach, P., & Kreiner, S. (2004). Happiness and life satisfaction in advanced European countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(4), 359–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2012). World happiness report. New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2013). World happiness report. New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2015). World happiness report. New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2013). Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: The Pemberton happiness index. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007). Report of the nineteenth session of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Geneva: Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahan, S. (2004). Measuring human development: Evolution of the human development index. Journal of Social StudiesDhaka, 21–42.

  • KPMG. (2011). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. Switzerland: KPMG, http://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/IssuesAndInsights/Documents/corporate-responsibility2011.pdf.

  • Kuznets, S. (1934). National Income 19291932. A report to the U.S. Senate, 73rd Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C24–C33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, V., & Lang, G. (2010). China’s “Green GDP” experiment and the struggle for ecological modernisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40(1), 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (2006). The revenge of gaia: Earth’s climate in crisis and the fate of humanity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (2010). The vanishing face of gaia: A final warning (Pbk ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, B. (2010). Earth: Making a life on a tough new planet (1st ed.). New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Economics Foundation. (2015). Happy planet index, http://www.happyplanetindex.org.

  • Ott, J. C. (2011). Government and happiness in 130 nations: Good governance fosters higher level and more equality of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Ray, M. (2014). Redefining the human development index to account for sustainability. Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(3), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiskin, E. D., White, A. L., Johnson, J. K., & Votta, T. J. (2008). Servicizing the chemical supply chain. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(2–3), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, S. (2007). Sustainability through servicizing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, T. M., Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline : The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafik, N. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: An econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 757–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2006). Irrational exuberance (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger, J. K., & Roberts, J. T. (2010). From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24(7), 1151–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C.-M. (2012). Search inside yourself. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tideman, S. G. (2011). Gross national happiness. In L. Zsolnai (Ed.), Ethical principles and economic transformation—A Buddhist perspective 30 (pp. 133–153). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C., & Sulkowski, A. J. (2010). A Greener Company makes for happier employees more so than does a more valuable one: A regression analysis of employee satisfaction, perceived environmental performance and firm financial value. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 11(4), 274–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. L., Stoughton, M., & Feng, L. (1999). Servicizing: The quiet transition to extended product responsibility. Tellus Institute, Boston, http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/17/16433.pdf.

  • White, D. S., & Sulkowski, A. J. (2010). Relative ecological footprints based on resource usage efficiency per capita: Macro-level segmentation of 121 countries. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 2(2), 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIN/Gallup International Association. (2015). End of year survey, http://www.wingia.com/en/survey/end_of_year_survey.

  • Yang, H., He, J., & Chen, S. (2015). The fragility of the environmental Kuznets curve: Revisiting the hypothesis with Chinese data via an “Extreme Bound Analysis”. Ecological Economics, 109, 41–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, J., Zheng, M., & Chen, J. (2015). The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China. Energy Policy, 77, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurick, D. (2006). Gross national happiness and environmental status in Bhutan. Geographical Review, 96(4), 657–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Sulkowski.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Country data, listed by level of happiness

Country

Net Happiness

Happiness (% of max)

CO2

CO2 (% of max)

HDI

HDI (% of max)

GNI

GNI (% of max)

Fiji

85

100

1.5

9

0.70

75

3670

5

Nigeria

84

99

0.5

3

0.47

50

1240

2

Netherlands

77

91

11.0

62

0.92

98

48,530

66

Colombia

73

86

1.6

9

0.72

77

5460

7

Ghana

72

85

0.4

2

0.56

59

1260

2

Switzerland

69.5

82

5.0

28

0.91

97

73,680

100

Finland

69

81

11.5

66

0.89

95

47,140

64

Philippines

69

81

0.9

5

0.65

70

2060

3

Brazil

68.5

81

2.2

12

0.73

78

9520

13

Malaysia

68

80

7.7

44

0.77

82

8150

11

Saudi Arabia

66

78

17.0

97

0.78

83

19,360

26

Denmark

64

75

8.3

48

0.90

96

59,590

81

Iceland

63.5

75

6.2

35

0.91

97

33,900

46

Uzbekistan

62

73

3.7

21

0.65

70

1300

2

Azerbaijan

60

71

5.1

29

0.73

78

5370

7

Peru

59.5

70

2.0

11

0.74

79

4720

6

Ecuador

58.5

69

2.2

12

0.72

77

4330

6

Spain

55

65

5.9

33

0.89

94

31,420

43

Armenia

53

62

1.4

8

0.73

78

3330

5

Germany

52.5

62

9.1

52

0.92

98

43,300

59

Austria

51

60

8.0

45

0.90

95

47,060

64

Singapore

50

59

2.7

15

0.90

95

42,530

58

Sweden

50

59

5.6

32

0.92

98

50,860

69

Japan

49

58

9.2

52

0.91

97

42,190

57

Canada

47.5

56

16.2

92

0.91

97

43,250

59

Belgium

44

52

10.0

57

0.90

96

45,840

62

Korea, Rep (South)

43.5

51

11.5

65

0.91

97

19,720

27

India

40.5

48

1.7

9

0.55

59

1290

2

Bosnia and Herzegovina

39.5

46

8.1

46

0.74

78

4640

6

Australia

39

46

16.9

96

0.94

100

46,310

63

Mozambique

39

46

0.1

1

0.33

35

430

1

France

38

45

5.6

32

0.89

95

42,280

57

Cameroon

36

42

0.4

2

0.50

53

1130

2

Macedonia

35.5

42

5.2

29

0.74

79

4580

6

South Africa

35

41

9.2

52

0.63

67

6100

8

USA

33.5

39

17.6

100

0.94

100

48,960

66

Kenya

32.5

38

0.3

2

0.52

55

800

1

Russian Federation

31.5

37

12.2

70

0.79

84

10,000

14

Vietnam

30.5

36

1.7

10

0.62

66

1270

2

Bulgaria

29.5

35

5.9

34

0.78

83

6320

9

Tunisia

29.5

35

2.5

14

0.71

76

4150

6

Ukraine

29

34

6.6

38

0.74

79

2990

4

Moldava

28

33

1.4

8

0.66

70

1820

2

Pakistan

28

33

0.9

5

0.52

55

1060

1

Hong Kong

27.5

32

5.2

29

0.91

97

33,630

46

China

27

32

6.2

35

0.70

75

4240

6

UK

27

32

7.9

45

0.88

93

38,690

53

Georgia

25

29

1.4

8

0.75

79

2680

4

Czech Republic

24.5

29

10.6

60

0.87

93

18,370

25

Turkey

24.5

29

4.1

24

0.72

77

9980

14

Morocco

24

28

1.6

9

0.59

63

2880

4

Italy

23

27

6.7

38

0.88

94

35,520

48

Ireland

18

21

8.9

51

0.92

98

42,810

58

Poland

18

21

8.3

47

0.82

88

12,400

17

Serbia

14.5

17

6.3

36

0.77

82

5550

8

Iraq

12

14

3.7

21

0.59

63

4380

6

Lithuania

9

11

4.1

23

0.82

87

11,620

16

Portugal

8

9

4.9

28

0.82

87

21,870

30

Egypt

0

0

2.6

15

0.66

71

2550

3

Romania

−10

−12

3.7

21

0.79

84

8010

11

Lebanon

−12.5

−15

4.7

27

0.75

79

8360

11

Appendix 2

Countries and associated data listed by cluster

Country

Happiness

CO2 per capita

HDI

GNI per capita

Cluster

Fiji

85

1.499937

0.702

3670

1

Nigeria

84

0.494091

0.471

1240

1

Colombia

73

1.629452

0.719

5460

1

Ghana

72

0.370888

0.558

1260

1

Philippines

69

0.873148

0.654

2060

1

Uzbekistan

62

3.656678

0.654

1300

1

Peru

59.5

1.967658

0.741

4720

1

Ecuador

58.5

2.175598

0.724

4330

1

Armenia

53

1.424236

0.729

3330

1

India

40.5

1.666209

0.554

1290

1

Mozambique

39

0.120258

0.327

430

1

Cameroon

36

0.350799

0.495

1130

1

Kenya

32.5

0.303782

0.519

800

1

Vietnam

30.5

1.728118

0.617

1270

1

Tunisia

29.5

2.453102

0.712

4150

1

Moldova

28

1.363005

0.66

1820

1

Pakistan

28

0.932118

0.515

1060

1

Georgia

25

1.401643

0.745

2680

1

Morocco

24

1.599383

0.591

2880

1

Iraq

12

3.703433

0.59

4380

1

Egypt

0

2.622791

0.662

2550

1

Brazil

68.5

2.150268

0.73

9520

2

Malaysia

68

7.667467

0.769

8150

2

Azerbaijan

60

5.050749

0.734

5370

2

Bosnia and Herzegovina

39.5

8.093102

0.735

4640

2

Macedonia

35.5

5.171997

0.74

4580

2

South Africa

35

9.204085

0.629

6100

2

Russian Federation

31.5

12.2255

0.788

10,000

2

Bulgaria

29.5

5.930052

0.782

6320

2

Ukraine

29

6.644867

0.74

2990

2

China

27

6.194858

0.699

4240

2

Turkey

24.5

4.131031

0.722

9980

2

Poland

18

8.308632

0.821

12,400

2

Serbia

14.5

6.303584

0.769

5550

2

Lithuania

9

4.12574

0.818

11,620

2

Romania

−10

3.673158

0.786

8010

2

Lebanon

−12.5

4.700013

0.745

8360

2

Netherlands

77

10.95836

0.921

48,530

3

Finland

69

11.53084

0.892

47,140

3

Germany

52.5

9.114842

0.92

43,300

3

Singapore

50

2.663192

0.895

42,530

3

Japan

49

9.185651

0.912

42,190

3

Canada

47.5

16.22

0.911

43,250

3

Belgium

44

9.999147

0.897

45,840

3

Australia

39

16.90802

0.938

46,310

3

USA

33.5

17.56416

0.937

48,960

3

Ireland

18

8.939753

0.916

42,810

3

Switzerland

69.5

4.952968

0.913

73,680

4

Denmark

64

8.346405

0.901

59,590

4

Iceland

63.5

6.168529

0.906

33,900

4

Spain

55

5.853466

0.885

31,420

4

Austria

51

7.973648

0.895

47,060

4

Sweden

50

5.599744

0.916

50,860

4

France

38

5.555374

0.893

42,280

4

Hong Kong

27.5

5.16623

0.906

33,630

4

UK

27

7.925093

0.875

38,690

4

Italy

23

6.717667

0.881

35,520

4

Saudi Arabia

66

17.03991

0.782

19,360

5

Korea, Rep (South)

43.5

11.48689

0.909

19,720

5

Czech Republic

24.5

10.62301

0.873

18,370

5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sulkowski, A., White, D.S. A happiness Kuznets curve? Using model-based cluster analysis to group countries based on happiness, development, income, and carbon emissions. Environ Dev Sustain 18, 1095–1111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9689-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9689-z

Keywords

Navigation