Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Future projections of worst floods and dam break analysis in Mahanadi River Basin under CMIP6 climate change scenarios

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the hydrological effects and flood risks of the Hirakud Reservoir, considering different CMIP6 climate change scenarios. Using the HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS models, the study evaluates future flow patterns and the potential repercussions of dam breaches. The following summary of the work: firstly, the HEC-HMS model is calibrated and validated using daily stage-discharge observations from the Basantpur station. With coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.764 and 0.858 for calibration and validation, respectively, the model demonstrates satisfactory performance. Secondly, The HEC-HMS model predicts future flow for the Hirakud Reservoir under three climate change scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5) and for three future periods (near future, mid future and far future). Thirdly, by analyzing time-series hydrographs, the study identifies peak flooding events. In addition, the HEC-RAS model is used to assess the effects of dam breaches. Downstream of the Hirakud Dam, the analysis highlights potential inundation areas and depth variations. The study determines the following inundation areas for the worst flood scenarios: 3651.52 km2, 2931.46 km2 and 4207.6 km2 for the near-future, mid-future and far-future periods, respectively. In addition, the utmost flood depths for these scenarios are determined to be 31 m, 29 m and 39 m for the respective future periods. The study area identifies 105 vulnerable villages and several towns. This study emphasizes the importance of contemplating climate change scenarios and implementing proactive measures to mitigate the peak flooding events in the Hirakud reservoir region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Aadhar, S., & Mishra, V. (2017). High-resolution near real-time drought monitoring in South Asia. Scientific Data, 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aadhar, S., & Mishra, V. (2020). On the projected decline in droughts over South Asia in CMIP6 multimodel ensemble. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(20), e2020JD033587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdelghani, L. (2023). Modeling of dam-break flood wave propagation using HEC-RAS 2D and GIS: Case study of Taksebt dam in Algeria. World Journal of Engineering, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-10-2022-0405

  • Abdulrazzaq, I. D., Jalut, Q. H., & Abbas, J. M. (2022). Evaluation of dam breach parameters using different approaches for earth-fill Dam. In Geotechnical Engineering and Sustainable Construction: Sustainable Geotechnical Engineering (pp. 135–144). Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharki, S., Taia, S., Arjdal, Y., & Hack, J. (2023). Hydrological modeling of spatial and temporal variations in streamflow due to multiple climate change scenarios in northwestern Morocco. Climate Services, 30, 100388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. K., & Marshall Shepherd, J. (2013). Floods in a changing climate. Geography Compass, 7(2), 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaji, B., & Kumar, S. (2018). Dam break analysis of Kalyani dam using HEC-RAS. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(5), 372–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basheer, T. A., Wayayok, A., Yusuf, B., & Kamal, M. R. (2017). Dam Breach parameters and their influence on flood hydrographs for Mosul Dam. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 12(11), 2896–2908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharath, A., Shivapur, A. V., Hiremath, C. G., & Maddamsetty, R. (2021). Dam break analysis using HEC-RAS and HEC-GeoRAS: A case study of Hidkal dam, Karnataka state, India. Environmental Challenges, 5, 100401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilali, A. E., Taleb, I., Nafii, A., & Taleb, A. (2022). A practical probabilistic approach for simulating life loss in an urban area associated with a dam-break flood. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 76, 103011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, W. C. (1989). A review of the USDA SCS curve number method. Soil Research, 27(3), 511–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, A. J. (2016). Multivariate bias correction of climate model output: Matching marginal distributions and intervariable dependence structure. Journal of Climate, 29(19), 7045–7064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, O. N., & Nandargi, S. (2003). Hydrometeorological aspects of floods in India. Natural Hazards, 28, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, B., Xia, J., Li, Q., & Zhou, M. (2022). Risk assessment for people and vehicles in an extreme urban flood: Case study of the “7.20” flood event in Zhengzhou, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 80, 103205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich, D. C. (1995). Peak outflow from breached embankment dam. Journal of water Resources Planning and Management, 121(1), 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich, D. C. (2008). Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(12), 1708–1721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidden, M. J., Riahi, K., Smith, S. J., Fujimori, S., Luderer, G., Kriegler, E., et al. (2019). Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: A dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century. Geoscientific Model Development, 12(4), 1443–1475.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. A. (1978). Flood routing by the Muskingum method. Journal of Hydrology, 36(3-4), 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi, Y., Tanoue, M., Sasaki, O., Zhou, X., & Yamazaki, D. (2021). Global exposure to flooding from the new CMIP6 climate model projections. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3740.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jena, P. P., Chatterjee, C., Pradhan, G., & Mishra, A. (2014). Are recent frequent high floods in Mahanadi basin in eastern India due to increase in extreme rainfalls? Journal of Hydrology, 517, 847–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, D. M., & Dwarakish, G. S. (2022). Ranking of downscaled CMIP5 and CMIP6 GCMs at a basin scale: Case study of a tropical river basin on the South West coast of India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(1), 120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. S., Ramachandran, A., Malini, P., & Usha, N. (2012). Adopt adaptation to changing climate: Realizing the need of the hour. Ecology, Environment and Conservation Journal, 18(1), 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz, Z. W., Hirabayashi, Y., & Kanae, S. (2010). River floods in the changing climate—Observations and projections. Water Resources Management, 24, 2633–2646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmi, D. D., & Satyanarayana, A. N. V. (2019). Influence of atmospheric rivers in the occurrence of devastating flood associated with extreme precipitation events over Chennai using different reanalysis data sets. Atmospheric Research, 215, 12–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, T., Maddocks, A., Iceland, C., Ward, P., & Winsemius, H. (2015). World’s 15 countries with the most people exposed to river floods. World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, T. C., & Langridge-Monopolis, J. (1984). Breaching charateristics of dam failures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(5), 567–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraun, D., Wetterhall, F., Ireson, A. M., Chandler, R. E., Kendon, E. J., Widmann, M., et al. (2010). Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Reviews of Geophysics, 48(3).

  • McCuen, R. H. (1982). A guide to hydrologic analysis using SCS methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, V., Bhatia, U., & Tiwari, A. D. (2020). Bias-corrected climate projections for South Asia from coupled model intercomparison project-6. Scientific data, 7(1), 338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, G. K., Chatterjee, U., Mishra, M., & Mohanty, A. (2022). Vulnerability assessment of environmental degradation due to coastal hazards using geospatial technology—A study of Puri coast along the Mahanadi Delta, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(15), 1322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, D., Tiwari, A. D., & Mishra, V. (2022). On the occurrence of the observed worst flood in Mahanadi River basin under the warming climate. Weather and Climate Extremes, 38, 100520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parhi, P. K., Mishra, S. K., Singh, R., & Tripathi, V. K. (2012a). Floods in Mahanadi river basin Orissa (India): A critical review. India Water Week-Water Energy and Food Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parhi, P. K., Sankhua, R. N., & Roy, G. P. (2012b). Calibration of channel roughness for Mahanadi River (India) using HEC-RAS model. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 4(10), 847–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, F. M., & Dettinger, M. D. (2012). Historical and national perspectives on extreme West Coast precipitation associated with atmospheric rivers during December 2010. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(6), 783–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., Sahai, A. K., & Mishra, V. (2017). Short to sub-seasonal hydrologic forecast to manage water and agricultural resources in India. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(2), 707–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Wasko, C., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2018). If precipitation extremes are increasing, why aren’t floods? Water Resources Research, 54(11), 8545–8551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabari, H. (2020). Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedla, M. G., Cho, Y., & Jun, K. (2021). Flood mapping from dam break due to peak inflow: A coupled rainfall–runoff and hydraulic models approach. Hydrology, 8(2), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE. (1994). Army corps of engineers: Engineering and designchannel stability assessment for flood control projects,. Rep. No. No: EM, 1110-2. USACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE. (2010). HEC-RAS, River Analysis System. In Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System, Usuer’s Manual, Version 4. USACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Thun, J. L., & Gillette, D. R. (1990). Guidance on breach parameters, unpublished internal document (p. 17). US Bureau of Reclamation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, R. J., Jain, V., Katuri, A., Lahiri, S., Parkash, S., Singhvi, A. K., et al. (2019). Riverine flood hazard: Part B. Disaster risk reduction in India. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 85(1), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. W., Maurer, E. P., Kumar, A., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2002). Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107(D20), ACL-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C., Fu, H., Yang, J., & Wang, L. (2022). Assessment of the relationship between land use and flood risk based on a coupled hydrological–hydraulic model: A case study of Zhaojue River Basin in Southwestern China. Land, 11(8), 1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Zhang, L. M. (2009). Breaching parameters for earth and rockfill dams. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(12), 1957–1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, X. (2011). A dam break analysis using HEC-RAS. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2011.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the India Meteorological Department (IMD), Pune and Central Water Commission (CWC), New Delhi, for obtaining the Daily rainfall and stage-discharge data, respectively, of Mahanadi River Basin through the website <https://indiawris.gov.in/wris/#/home>. The authors would like to acknowledge the USGS for downloading the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) tiles through the website <https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/> and USACE for downloading the HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS software through the website <https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/> The authors also acknowledge the Office of Designs and Dam Safety, Bhubaneswar, for providing the required data of Hirakud Dam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Execution and manuscript draft preparation: Roniki Anjaneyulu

Supervision and preparation of final manuscript: Ratnakar Swain

Editing and suggestions on the overall research work: Mukunda Dev Behera

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ratnakar Swain.

Ethics declarations

All authors have read, understood and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anjaneyulu, R., Swain, R. & Behera, M.D. Future projections of worst floods and dam break analysis in Mahanadi River Basin under CMIP6 climate change scenarios. Environ Monit Assess 195, 1173 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11797-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11797-3

Keywords

Navigation