Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The habitat, ecological life conditions, and usage characteristics of the otter (Lutra lutra L. 1758) in the Balikdami Wildlife Development Area

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the habitat usage characteristics of the otter, which provides important information on the status of aquatic and coastal ecosystems. The Balikdami (Fish House) Wildlife Development Area, where the study was carried out, was registered in 1994 and was declared a natural site in 1998. The total area of the site is 1470 km2. In order to determine the habitat usage characteristics of the otter, photo traps were placed according to the assumed habitat characteristics between the river and the terrestrial areas near the river. Previous research suggested that there should be at least 15 days of observation. In this study, 11 photo traps were left in the study area at a ratio of 1463 camera traps/day. A total of 37 different otter images were obtained in 3, 4, and 5 points at the end of the study. The data indicated that the otters preferred to use places that were close to the aquatic aquarium. They did not prefer densely vegetated areas, open areas, and places where there was human intervention, large construction, water borders, water pump edges, and areas with high human activity. The otters were active at night. While the number of otters is increasing in Turkey, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, otters are in the NT (near threat) category. The otter is protected in all countries where it is increasing in number. Therefore, a better understanding of the habitat preferences of the otter will help us to better protect it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albayrak, İ. (1995). Otter and Akyaka. Tubitak, Science and Technical Ankara, 28(337), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albayrak, İ. (2002). Population of otter (Lutra lutra L. 1758) in Kırıkkale Kızılırmak, (Mammalia: Carnivora). 1-14. In İ. Albayrak (Ed.), Situation in Turkey II of otter. Symposium, 21-22 September 2002, Beymelek, Antalya (pp. 1–94). Ankara: TUBITAK Printing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi, L., Chanin, P., & Macdonald, D. W. (2004). Competition between Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) and American mink (Mustela vison) probed by niche shift. Oikos, 106, 19–26 ISSN 0030-1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy, A. (1996). Vertebrates mammals turkey. Ministry of Environment, General Directorate of Environmental Protection Project No: 90-K-1000-90 ISBN: 975-7746-24-X Ankara.

  • Erdogan, A., Öz, M., & Sert, H. (2000). The situation of otter in Antalya region and in the world. Journal of Nature and Human, Ankara, 34(1), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge, S. (1968). Territoriality of the otter (Lutra lutra L.). Wiley-Oikos, 19, 81–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/3564733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google Earth. (2018). Google Maps and Google Earth imagery Image © 2018 Digital Globe.

  • Güven, N. (2000). Turkey otter project. Journal of Nature and Human, Ankara, 34(1), 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hus, S. (1974). Hunting animals and hunting (Vol. 1(1), pp. 170–173). Istanbul: Kutulmuş Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, L. G., Kaynakci-Elinc, Z., Yucedag, C., & Cetin, M. (2018). Environmental outdoor plant preferences: a practical approach for choosing outdoor plants in urban or suburban residential areas in Antalya, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(12), 7945–7952.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, E., Agca, M., Adiguzel, F., & Cetin, M. (2019). Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 25(6), 1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1470896.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCafferty, D. (2005). Ecology and conservation of otters (Lutra lutra) in Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park. Glasgow Naturalist, 24(3), 29–35 ISSN 0373-241X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, R., & Jefferies D. J. (1996). Otter Survey of England, 1991-1994: a report on the decline and recovery of the otter in England and on its distribution, status and conservation. Vincent Wildlife Trust; 1st Ed. Edition 222 pp. ISBN: 978-0946081318

  • Suseven, B. (2005). Otter status in Tirebolu district. Gökova- Akyaka Lovers Association (G.A.S.-Der) Science Series 2, 2005 ISBN: 975- 98483-3-3

  • Suseven, B., & Schmitz, T. (2005). The situation of the Eurasian Fishotter (Lutra lutra) at Lake Uluabat. Gökova- Akyaka Lovers Association (G.A.S.-Der) Science Series 1, ISBN: 975- 98483-2-5

  • Toyran, K. (2010). Kırıkkale Kızılırmak otter (Lutra lutra Linnaeus 1758) determination of distribution areas, Kırıkkale University, Institute of Science, Department of Biology, PhD Thesis.

  • Turan, İ., Keten, A., Yorulmaz, T., Doğan, C., & Baştar, F. (2015). The habitat of the otter (Lutra lutra) in Lake Abant. Journal of Forestry Research, 1(2), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • URL-1. (2015). http://www.iucnredlist.org/search (Accessibility on 10.12.2015).

  • URL-2. (2015). http://www.uhdigm.adalet.gov.tr/sozles-meler/coktaraflisoz/ak/turkce/104_tur.pdf (accessibility on 15.12.2015).

  • URL-3. (2015). http://www.turkiyesulakalanlari.com/balikdami-sazliklari-eskisehir/ (Accessibility on 10.12.2015).

  • Uysal, İ. (2002). Fish farming and sea otter relations, the situation in Turkey II of the otter. Symposium booklet, page 64, Antalya 2002.

  • Veryeri, N.G., & Yerli S.V. (2002). Otter study in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. In the case of the otter in Turkey. Symposium book.p73-83, Eskisehir

  • Veryeri, N. G., & Yerli S. V. (2008). The method used in otter research and the sample of the Eastern Mediterranean. III. Status of otters in Turkey. Symposium book. p.27, Eskisehir.

  • Yucedag, C., & Kaya, L. G. (2017). In H. Arapgirlioglu, A. Atik, & R. L. Elliott (Eds.), Chapter 104. Recreational trend and demands of people in Isparta-Turkey, Book: Researches on science and art in 21st Century Turkey. Edward Turgeon, Gece Publishing ISBN: 978-605-180-771-3.

  • Yucedag, C., Kaya, L. G., & Cetin, M. (2018). Identifying and assessing environmental awareness of hotel and restaurant employees’ attitudes in the Amasra District of Bartin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6456-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Cetin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozkazanc, N.K., Ozay, E., Ozel, H.B. et al. The habitat, ecological life conditions, and usage characteristics of the otter (Lutra lutra L. 1758) in the Balikdami Wildlife Development Area. Environ Monit Assess 191, 645 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7833-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7833-1

Keywords

Navigation