Abstract
Strong economic incentives stimulate the conversion of farmland to non-farm uses possessing higher economic benefits, and rising land values can result in further conversions in the surrounding areas. However, previous studies focused exclusively on the analysis of attribute data, without concern for location or geographic information. Our study focuses on the application of spatial analysis method by exploring the magnitude and patterns of farmland use changes and farmland transactions in Tainan County in southwestern Taiwan. The results show that farmland use changes and transactions appear to cluster in specific locations—near urban planning areas, industrial parks, and science parks. Clustered farmland use changes indicate both excessive development of some farmland and possible protection of other farmland, while clustered farmland transactions indicate potential pressure for future conversion to non-farming uses. Overall, the spatial analyses indicate (without necessarily implying a cause-and-effect relationship) that the greater the farmland use change, the greater the number of farmland transactions. This approach to exploring the spatial patterns in and the interaction between farmland use change and farmland transactions can be applied to other regions facing increasing competition for farmland conversions and may be a useful tool for monitoring both urban expansion and increased farmland transactions. These occurrences should be closely monitored by governments to avoid excessive loss of farmland.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelairas-Etxebarria, P., & Astorkiza, I. (2012). Farmland prices and land-use changes in periurban protected natural areas. Land Use Policy, 29, 674–683.
Adelaja, A., Sullivan, K., & Hailu, Y. G. (2011). Endogenizing the planning horizon in urban fringe agriculture. Land Use Policy, 28(1), 66–75.
Alig, R. J., Kline, J. D., & Lichtenstein, M. (2004). Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 219–234.
Androkovich, R. A. (2010). British Columbia’s agricultural land reserve: Economic, legal and political issues. Land Use Policy, 30, 365–372.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–116.
Baker, K. (2006). Baker review of land use planning: Final report. London: HMSO.
Bryant, C. R., & Johnston, T. R. R. (1992). Agriculture in the City’s Countryside. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Chang, H. S., Chen, T. L., & Chen, P. C. (2014a). Explore the spatial relationship between Farmland use changes and farmland transactions. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 14(2/3), 167–182.
Chang, Y. C., Lee, P. P., & Kan, C. E. (2014b). Farm-level land diversity of smallholders with limited input resources during urbanization in Taiwan. Paddy and Water Environment, 12, 155–162.
Cheshire, P. (1995). On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica, 62, 247–267.
Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. London: Pion.
Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial Processes. London: Pion.
David, W. S., & Wang, J. L. (2005). Statistical Analysis of Geographic Information with ArcView GIS And ArcGIS. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Drescher, K., Henderson, J., & McNamara, K. (2001). Farmland prices determinants. In: Proceedings of American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting Chicago, IL.
Drozd, D., & Johnson, B. (2004). Dynamics of a rural land market experiencing farmland conversion to acreages: The case of Saunders County, Nebraska. Land Economics, 80(2), 294–311.
Duke, J. M., & Aull-Hyde, R. (2002). Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics, 42, 131–145.
EEA (European Environment Agency). (2006). Urban Sprawl in Europe-The Ignored Challenge. Luxembourg: European Communities.
Elad, R. L., Clifton, I. D., & Epperson, J. E. (1994). Hedonic estimation applied to the farmland market, Georgia. Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics, 26(6), 351–366.
Ethical Trading Initiative. (2005). ETI smallholder guidelines. Cromwell House, London.
Falk, B. (1991). Formally testing the present value model of farmland prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(1), 1–10.
Guiling, P., Brorsen, B. W., & Doye, D. (2009). Effect of urban proximity on agricultural land values. Land Economics, 85, 252–264.
Houston, P. (2005). Re-valuing the fringe: some findings on the value of agricultural production in Australia’s periurban regions. Geographical Research, 43(2), 209–223.
Huang, H., Miller, Y., Sherrick, B. J., & Gómez, M. I. (2006). Factors influencing Illinois farmland values. American Agricultural Economics Association, 88(2), 458–470.
Kline, J., & Wichelns, D. (1996). Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs. Land Economics, 72, 538–549.
Lee, S. L. (2001). Developing a bivariate spatial association measure: An integration of Pearson's r and Moran's I. Journal of Geographical Systems, 3, 369–385.
Lee, C. J., Fang, Y. R., & Liao, B. C. (2011). Attitude towards agricultural land functions in taiwan: a comparative study of the general public and farmers and of spatial difference. Journal of Taiwan Land Research, 14(1), 29–67.
Lichtenberg, E., & Ding, C. (2008). Assessing farmland protection policy in China. Land Use Policy, 25, 59–68.
Paül, V., & McKenzie, F. H. (2010). Agricultural areas under metropolitan threats: lessons for Perth from Barcelona. In G. W. Luck, D. Race, & R. Black (Eds.), Demographic Change in Australia’s Rural Landscapes (pp. 125–152). Dordrecht: Springer.
Paül, V., & McKenzie, F. H. (2013). Periurban farmland conservation and development of alternative food networks: Insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Land Use Policy, 30(1), 94–105.
Pendall, R., Martin, J., & Fulton, W. (2002). Holding the line: Urban containment in the United States. Washington: The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
Plantinga, A. J., & Miller, D. J. (2001). Agricultural land values and the value of rights to future land development. Land Economics, 77(1), 56–67.
Pyle, L. A. (1985). The land market beyond the urban fringe. Geographical Reviews, 75(1), 32–43.
Renwick, A., Jansson, T., Verburg, P. H., Revoredo-Giha, C., Britz, W., Gocht, A., & McCracken, D. (2013). Policy reform and agricultural land abandonment in the EU. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 446–457.
Roose, A., Kull, A., Gauk, M., & Tali, T. (2013). Land use policy shocks in the post-communist urban fringe: A case study of Estonia. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 76–83.
Rosenberger, R. S. (1998). Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs: comment. Land Economics, 74(4), 557–565.
Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). (2001). A new vision for planning: Delivering sustainable communities, An agenda for action. London: RTPI.
Sklenicka, P., Molnarova, K., Pixova, K. C., & Salek, M. E. (2013). Factors affecting farmland prices in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 130–136.
Sokal, R. R., & Oden, N. L. (1978). Spatial autocorrelation in biology 1. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10(2), 199–228.
Stewart, P. A., & Libby, L. W. (1998). Determinants of farmland value: the case of DeKalb County, Illinois. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 20(1), 80–95.
Thorson, J. A. (1994). Zoning Policy Change and the Urban Fringe Land Market. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 22(3), 527–538.
Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46(supplement), 234–240.
Van Kooten, C. (1993). Land resource economics and sustainable development: Economic policies and the common good. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Variyam, J. N., Jordan, J. L., & Epperson, J. E. (1990). Preferences of citizens for agricultural policies: evidence from a national survey. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2), 257–267.
Wang, Y., & Scott, S. (2008). Illegal farmland conversion in China’s urban periphery: Local regime and national transitions. Urban Geography, 29(4), 327–347.
Wang, J., Chen, Y., Shao, X., Zhang, Y., & Cao, Y. (2012). Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: Present, trend and future. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 737–749.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, HS., Chen, TL. Exploring spatial patterns of farmland transactions and farmland use changes. Environ Monit Assess 187, 596 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4825-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4825-7