Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was carried out to develop a vulnerability map for Barka region in the North Batina of Oman using DRASTIC vulnerability index method in GIS environment. DRASTIC layers were created using data from published reports and the seven DRASTIC layers were processed by the ArcGIS geographic information system. Finally, DRASTIC maps were created for 1995 and 2004 to understand the long-term changes in the vulnerability index. DRASTIC vulnerability maps were evaluated using groundwater quality data such as chemical and biological parameters. DRASTIC vulnerability maps of 1995 and 2004 indicate that the northern part of Barka is more vulnerable to pollution than southern part and the central part of Barka also shows high relative vulnerability which is mostly related to the high conductivity values. Moreover, the changes in water level due to high abstraction rate of groundwater reflect in the vulnerability maps and low vulnerability area is increased in the southern part during 2004 compared to 1995. Moreover, regional distribution maps of nitrate, chloride and total and fecal coliforms are well correlated with DRASTIC vulnerability maps. In contrast to this, even though DRASTIC method predicted the central part of the study region is highly vulnerable, both chemical and biological parameters show lower concentrations in this region compared to coastal belt, which is mainly due to agricultural and urban development. In Barka, urban development and agricultural activities are very high in coastal region compared to southern and central part of the study area. Hence, this study concluded that DRASTIC method is also applicable in coastal region having ubiquitous contamination sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Al-Adamat, R. A. N., Foster, I. D. L., & Baban, S. M. J. (2003). Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC. Applied Geography, 23, 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller, L., Bennet, T., Leher, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. Technical Report 600/2-87-035, EPA.

  • Al-Zabet, T. (2002). Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method. Environmental Geology, 43, 203–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, (19th edn). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, I. S., Mohamed, M. A., Hiyama, T., & Kato, K. (2005). A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Science of the Total Environment, 345, 127–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmat, Y., & Collin, M. (1990). Management oriented assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution. Israel Hydrological Service Report Jerusalem 6/90, 20.

  • Barbash, J. E., & Resek, E. A. (1996). Pesticides in groundwater: Distribution, trends, and governing factors. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita, M. (1994). Le carte della vulnerabilita` degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Teoria & practica (Aquifer vulnerability maps to pollution) (in Italian). Bologna: Pitagora Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita, M., & De-Regibus, C. (1995). Sperimentazione di alcune metodologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilita` degli aquiferi (in Italian). Bologna: Quaderni di Geologia Applicata, Pitagora Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerfliger, N., Jeannin, P. Y., & Zwahlen, F. (1999). Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: A new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environmental Geology, 39, 165–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA. (2003). National primary drinking water standards. EPA816-F-03-016.

  • Faye, S. C., Faye, S., Wohnlich, S., & Gaye, C. B. (2004). An assessment of the risk associated with urban development in the Thiaroye area (Senegal). Environmental Geology, 45, 312–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. D. (1987). Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Waegeningh, H. G., van, W. V. (Eds), The Hague. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollution, 38, 69–86.

  • Fritch, T. G., McKnight, C. L., Yelderman, J. C., Jr., & Arnold, J. G. (2000). An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the paluxy aquifer, central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach. Environmental Management, 25, 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogu, R. C., & Dassargues, A. (2000). Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environmental Geology, 39, 549–559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hem, J. D. (1985). Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water. U.S.Geological Survey water-supply paper 2254, p 264.

  • Kim, Y. J., & Hamm, S. Y. (1999). Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea. Hydrogeology Journal, 7, 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2003). Evaluation of waste disposal site using the DRASTIC system in southern Korea. Environmental Geology, 44, 654–664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matter, J. M., Waber, H. N., Loew, S., & Matter, A. (2005). Recharge areas and geochemical evolution of groundwater in an alluvial aquifer system in the Sultanate of Oman. Hydrogeology Journal, 14, 203–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melloul, A., & Collin, M. (1992). The ‘principal components’ statistical method as a complementary approach to geochemical methods in water quality factor identification; application to the Coastal Plain aquifer of Israel. Journal of Hydrology, 140, 49–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources (MWR) (1995). Eastern Batina resource assessment: Stage 1: Data Collection and Analysis. MWR -96-01.

  • Ministry of Water Resources (MWR) (2000). Soil Map of Oman.

  • Mott McDonald, MCI (1999). Master plan of the groundwater pollution protection in the Sultanate of Oman. Oman: Muscat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S. P. (1975). Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 11, 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ODWS. (1998). Omani drinking water standard, O.S. 8/1998, Directorate General for specifications and measurements, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Sultanate of Oman.

  • Pssero, R. N. (1990). AQUIPRO. Kalamazoo. Michigan: Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajmohan, N., Al-Futaisi, A., & Jamrah, A. (2007). Evaluation of long-term groundwater level data in regular monitoring wells, Barka, Sultanate of Oman. Hydrological Processes, 21, 3367–3379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secunda, S., Collin, M., & Melloul, A. J. (1998). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive land use in Israel’s Sharon region. Journal of Environmental Management, 54, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm, W., & Morgan, J. J. (1996). Aquatic chemistry p. 780. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapinta, A., & Hudak, P. F. (2003). Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential by pesticides in Central Thailand. Environment International, 29, 87–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA (1985). DRASTIC: A standard system for evaluating groundwater potential using hydrogeological settings. Ada, Oklahoma WA/EPA Series 1985.163.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993). A review of methods for assessing aquifer sensitivity and groundwater vulnerability to pesticide contamination. EPA-813-R-93002.

  • Van-Stempvoort, D., Evert, L., & Wassenaar, L. (1993). Aquifer vulnerability index: A GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 18, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von-Hoyer, M., & Sofner, B. (1998). Groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) areas of Germany p. 38. Hanover, Germany: Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources Archiv no 117854.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Jamrah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamrah, A., Al-Futaisi, A., Rajmohan, N. et al. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment. Environ Monit Assess 147, 125–138 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0104-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0104-6

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Natarajan Rajmohan