Abstract
This paper presents the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of four treatment technologies currently under investigation for recycling the greywater generated from households and describes the development of a new LCIA tool set produced in this study. The technologies investigated include reed beds, membrane bioreactors (MBR); membrane chemical reactors (MCR) and an innovative green roof water recycling system (GROW). The materials and energy required for the construction and operation phases of these technologies have been quantified for 20 development scales. All of the information gathered is used to prepare life cycle inventories for each technology. The inventories have been used as an input to Simapro Software for performing LCIA. Two assessment methods (CML-2 and Eco-indc-99) have been employed. For the CML method, the results were processed to express the environmental performance in ten impact categories including climate change/global warming, depletion of abiotic resources, acidification, eutrophication, and human toxicity. For the Eco-indc-99 method, results are shown in three generic environmental indicators: human health, eco system and natural resources. LCIA results obtained for 20 development scales have been used to develop a tool set using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system technique. The study results indicate that the technologies based on natural treatment processes (GROW and reed beds) have low environmental impact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dallas, S., Scheffe, B., & Ho, G. (2004). Reed beds for greywater treatment—Case study in Santa Elena-Monteverde, Costa Rica, Central America. Ecological Engineering, 23, 55–61.
Dixon, A. M. (2000). Simulation of domestic water re-use systems: greywater and rainwater in combination. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London.
Friedler, E. (2004). Quality of individual domestic greywater streams and its implication for on-site treatment and reuse possibilities. Environmental Technology, 25, 997–1008.
Friedler, E. (2005). Performance of pilot scale greywater reuse RBC/MBR based systems. WATERSAVE Network Event. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.watersave.uk.net/Presentations/Friedler_1.pdf.
Geodkoop, M., Oele, M., & Geleder, C. (2003). SimaPro 5.1—Reference manual. Amersfoort: PRé Consultants.
Grant, N., & Griggs, J. (2001). Reed beds for the treatment of domestic wastewater. London: BRE.
Jefferson, B., Palmer, A., Jeffrey, P., Stuetz, R., & Judd, S. (2004). Grey water characterisation and its impact on the selection and operation of technologies for urban reuse. Water Science and Technology, 50, 157–164.
Jeffrey, P., & Jefferson, B. (2001). Water recycling: How feasible is it? Filtration & Separation, 38(4), 26–29.
Matlab (2004). MATLAB®—The language of technical computing (version 7.0.1.24704). Natick: The Mathworks.
Memon, F. A., & Butler, D. (2005). Greywater reuse in households. Encyclopaedia of Water. New York: Wiley.
Memon, F. A., Butler, D., Han, W., Liu, S., Makropoulos, C. K., Avery, L., et al. (2005). Economic assessment tool for greywater recycling systems. Engineering Sustainability, Institution of Civil Engineers, 158(ES3), 155–161.
Shirley-Smith, C. (2005). The sustainability value of the green roof water recycling system in urban communities. WATERSAVE Network Event. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://www.watersave.uk.net/Presentations/Chris_Shirley-Smith.pdf.
Stephenson, T. (2000). Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. IWA.
Zheng, Z. (2005). Life cycle impact assessment of greywater treatment technologies. MSc dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Memon, F.A., Zheng, Z., Butler, D. et al. Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Greywater Recycling Technologies for New Developments. Environ Monit Assess 129, 27–35 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9422-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9422-3